Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Eagles Message Board

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.

Featured Replies

Just now, Procus said:

Seriously, go read up on Iran and its leaders.  This is an example of what is going on there.  All kidding aside, I suspect you really haven't been keeping up with what's going on inside Iran the past year.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/10/iran-at-least-23-children-killed-with-impunity-during-brutal-crackdown-on-youthful-protests/

Iran: At least 23 children killed with impunity during brutal crackdown on youthful protests

 

The fact that the Iranian government is a POS isn’t breaking news. That doesn’t change the fact that the money they received was theirs, Qatar has the money, and they will control how it is spent. Of course there will be fraud. 

  • Replies 21.6k
  • Views 743.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • VanHammersly
    VanHammersly

  • While I disagree with Biden trying to save these idiots from themselves, it just proves what a wonderful human being he is. IMO we should encourage Trumpbots to all give each other Covid so they die o

Posted Images

1 hour ago, Gannan said:

stack-of-wooden-pallets-at-warehouse.jpg

Dems love sending loads of cash to Iran

4 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

The fact that the Iranian government is a POS isn’t breaking news. That doesn’t change the fact that the money they received was theirs, Qatar has the money, and they will control how it is spent. Of course there will be fraud. 

How much of "their own money" do we still "owe" them at this point???

3 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

How much of "their own money" do we still "owe" them at this point???

The assets that were released were in South Korea. 

1 minute ago, Tnt4philly said:

The assets that were released were in South Korea. 

???  What???

4 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

How much of "their own money" do we still "owe" them at this point???

Going back to the embassy thing, you should really learn about the Iranian revolution and the ensuing hostage crises. If you actually want to know about this stuff, it would give you a framework. Iran petitioned the Hague for 10 billion. We haven't paid them anywhere near that amount. 

2 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

???  What???

The $6 billion is not and never was our money. The frozen Iranian assets were in Sourh Korea before being transferred to Qatar. 

27 minutes ago, Procus said:

Seriously, go read up on Iran and its leaders.  This is an example of what is going on there.  All kidding aside, I suspect you really haven't been keeping up with what's going on inside Iran the past year.

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/10/iran-at-least-23-children-killed-with-impunity-during-brutal-crackdown-on-youthful-protests/

Iran: At least 23 children killed with impunity during brutal crackdown on youthful protests

 

These sound like good guys. Glad Trump handed them a nuke on a silver platter. 

52 minutes ago, Tnt4philly said:

The fact that the Iranian government is a POS isn’t breaking news. That doesn’t change the fact that the money they received was theirs, Qatar has the money, and they will control how it is spent. Of course there will be fraud. 

No, that was not the Mullah's money.  That money belonged to the country of Iran which was hijacked by the Mullahs.  These suckers will pocket the money.  Is that really too difficult for you to understand?

33 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

These sound like good guys. Glad Trump handed them a nuke on a silver platter. 

You do realize that Obama's Iran deal EXPIRED ON ITS OWN TERMS in 2024.

24 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

These sound like good guys. Glad Trump handed them a nuke on a silver platter. 

How long will that silver platter take to get to the table?  Its been years...

Also,  Trump took out one of their highest ranking military officials and they didnt do ish.  Biden is handing them cash just like Obama.  

6 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

Trump took out one of their highest ranking military officials and they didnt do ish

Trumpbots: "Dear Leader authorized our military to kill a high ranking military official in Iran, isn't he so dreamy?"

Also trumpbots: "How dare that MF'ing Sleepy Joe Biden deploy our military to protect the US Embassy in Ukraine!?! This is a disgusting and heinous act of war!"

24 minutes ago, Procus said:

You do realize that Obama's Iran deal EXPIRED ON ITS OWN TERMS in 2024.

:roll:  Trumpbots and calendars

17 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:

How long will that silver platter take to get to the table?  Its been years...

They’ve been aggressively pursuing them since Trump tore up the deal. Thank God Obama’s deal took almost all their enriched Uranium or they would’ve had one by now. But it’s only a matter of time and thanks to Trump and the dumbest foreign policy decision in history there’s no way to negotiate a new one. 

Ooops.

Republican Congressman Accidentally Admits There’s No Proof of Biden Corruption

Republican Representative Nick Langworthy tried to defend the GOP investigation into Joe Biden’s alleged corruption—only to end up admitting that they still don’t have any proof.

Republicans have insisted for months that Biden is guilty of corruption and influence peddling overseas, despite producing no actual evidence. But they continue to claim they have proof that he and his son Hunter Biden accepted millions of dollars in bribes.

But Langworthy fumbled that point big time on Thursday during an interview with Fox News. Fox correspondent Gillian Turner pointed out that Republicans have yet to produce "a smoking gun: clear-cut, undeniable proof of the president’s involvement.”

"Well, we’ve never claimed that we have direct money going to the president, but many members of his family have received money from foreign governments,” Langworthy said.

 

Turner interrupted to correct him: "That is precisely the claim that the chairman of your committee, James Comer, and also Jim Jordan have made many times,” she said, referring to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, who alongside Comer has spearheaded the charge against Biden.

"We are putting an investigation together laying out the facts on the business dealings of this family,” Langworthy said awkwardly, trying to recover.

Langworthy did not fare much better in the rest of the interview. He also said that Hunter Biden’s former business partner Devon Archer had testified to the Oversight Committee under oath, which Turner again pointed out was not true. (And regardless of how he testified, Archer also refuted many of Republicans’ talking points against Joe Biden.)

Republicans’ main justification for continuing to investigate Biden is that they already have proof of his wrongdoing and are now just trying to expose the breadth of his crimes. Many Republicans, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, are starting to suggest opening an impeachment inquiry into Biden so that they can access more information and witnesses that will lead them to the truth.

But Langworthy’s stumble reveals the actual truth: Republicans have nothing on Biden. The reason they keep pushing forward is because they are looking for something to actually substantiate their allegations.

39 minutes ago, jsdarkstar said:

Ooops.

Republican Congressman Accidentally Admits There’s No Proof of Biden Corruption

Republican Representative Nick Langworthy tried to defend the GOP investigation into Joe Biden’s alleged corruption—only to end up admitting that they still don’t have any proof.

Republicans have insisted for months that Biden is guilty of corruption and influence peddling overseas, despite producing no actual evidence. But they continue to claim they have proof that he and his son Hunter Biden accepted millions of dollars in bribes.

But Langworthy fumbled that point big time on Thursday during an interview with Fox News. Fox correspondent Gillian Turner pointed out that Republicans have yet to produce "a smoking gun: clear-cut, undeniable proof of the president’s involvement.”

"Well, we’ve never claimed that we have direct money going to the president, but many members of his family have received money from foreign governments,” Langworthy said.

 

Turner interrupted to correct him: "That is precisely the claim that the chairman of your committee, James Comer, and also Jim Jordan have made many times,” she said, referring to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, who alongside Comer has spearheaded the charge against Biden.

"We are putting an investigation together laying out the facts on the business dealings of this family,” Langworthy said awkwardly, trying to recover.

Langworthy did not fare much better in the rest of the interview. He also said that Hunter Biden’s former business partner Devon Archer had testified to the Oversight Committee under oath, which Turner again pointed out was not true. (And regardless of how he testified, Archer also refuted many of Republicans’ talking points against Joe Biden.)

Republicans’ main justification for continuing to investigate Biden is that they already have proof of his wrongdoing and are now just trying to expose the breadth of his crimes. Many Republicans, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, are starting to suggest opening an impeachment inquiry into Biden so that they can access more information and witnesses that will lead them to the truth.

But Langworthy’s stumble reveals the actual truth: Republicans have nothing on Biden. The reason they keep pushing forward is because they are looking for something to actually substantiate their allegations.

Facts don’t matter to MAGA scum. 
 

57 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

They’ve been aggressively pursuing them since Trump tore up the deal. Thank God Obama’s deal took almost all their enriched Uranium or they would’ve had one by now. But it’s only a matter of time and thanks to Trump and the dumbest foreign policy decision in history there’s no way to negotiate a new one. 

Is that so?  And you know that how?

On 8/5/2023 at 1:33 PM, Gannan said:

They were literally calling for the vice president and the speaker of the house to be executed, but meh no big deal. 

Show me again where I said no big deal? 

2 hours ago, Gannan said:

Going back to the embassy thing, you should really learn about the Iranian revolution and the ensuing hostage crises. If you actually want to know about this stuff, it would give you a framework. Iran petitioned the Hague for 10 billion. We haven't paid them anywhere near that amount. 

Again - who is "Iran"?  I think most fair minded people would agree that the mullah regime is illegitimate at this stage.  Why would anybody release that money to a bunch of criminals?  That money should be held in trust for a legitimate regime.

1 hour ago, jsdarkstar said:

Ooops.

Republican Congressman Accidentally Admits There’s No Proof of Biden Corruption

Republican Representative Nick Langworthy tried to defend the GOP investigation into Joe Biden’s alleged corruption—only to end up admitting that they still don’t have any proof.

Republicans have insisted for months that Biden is guilty of corruption and influence peddling overseas, despite producing no actual evidence. But they continue to claim they have proof that he and his son Hunter Biden accepted millions of dollars in bribes.

But Langworthy fumbled that point big time on Thursday during an interview with Fox News. Fox correspondent Gillian Turner pointed out that Republicans have yet to produce "a smoking gun: clear-cut, undeniable proof of the president’s involvement.”

"Well, we’ve never claimed that we have direct money going to the president, but many members of his family have received money from foreign governments,” Langworthy said.

 

Turner interrupted to correct him: "That is precisely the claim that the chairman of your committee, James Comer, and also Jim Jordan have made many times,” she said, referring to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, who alongside Comer has spearheaded the charge against Biden.

"We are putting an investigation together laying out the facts on the business dealings of this family,” Langworthy said awkwardly, trying to recover.

Langworthy did not fare much better in the rest of the interview. He also said that Hunter Biden’s former business partner Devon Archer had testified to the Oversight Committee under oath, which Turner again pointed out was not true. (And regardless of how he testified, Archer also refuted many of Republicans’ talking points against Joe Biden.)

Republicans’ main justification for continuing to investigate Biden is that they already have proof of his wrongdoing and are now just trying to expose the breadth of his crimes. Many Republicans, including House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, are starting to suggest opening an impeachment inquiry into Biden so that they can access more information and witnesses that will lead them to the truth.

But Langworthy’s stumble reveals the actual truth: Republicans have nothing on Biden. The reason they keep pushing forward is because they are looking for something to actually substantiate their allegations.

yahoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

image.thumb.jpeg.6282859c8a7447c924632bd0b1416923.jpeg

 

Truth social tipped off Biden's weaponized DOJ to kill this man.

2 hours ago, Procus said:

Is that so?  And you know that how?

Common sense. We pulled out of a deal that was working, got nothing for it and, of course, Trump was lying about the "better deal” he was going to get. So we burned our diplomatic capital for nothing. The whole thing is pretty much a case study in why you shouldn’t elect a game show host president. Of course Biden’s a straight up bad ass so I suppose there’s an outside chance he could pull something off despite Trump’s F up but it’s a long shot. 

10 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:

Common sense. We pulled out of a deal that was working, got nothing for it and, of course, Trump was lying about the "better deal” he was going to get. So we burned our diplomatic capital for nothing. The whole thing is pretty much a case study in why you shouldn’t elect a game show host president. Of course Biden’s a straight up bad ass so I suppose there’s an outside chance he could pull something off despite Trump’s F up but it’s a long shot. 

Did you know that Iran "has been on the verge" of breaking out a nuclear weapon since at least as early as 2008.  If you did just a cursory amount of Internet research, you'd know that Iran hasn't allowed proper inspections of its nuclear facilities for quite a while now.

Best not to comment on things you are ignorant about.

52 minutes ago, Procus said:

Did you know that Iran "has been on the verge" of breaking out a nuclear weapon since at least as early as 2008.  If you did just a cursory amount of Internet research, you'd know that Iran hasn't allowed proper inspections of its nuclear facilities for quite a while now.

Best not to comment on things you are ignorant about.

They were allowing inspections under the deal, moron. They’re not anymore because the deal blew up. Again, Trump gave them a nuke, plain and simple, and we got absolutely nothing in return.  It’s impossible to overstate how stupid it was. 

7 hours ago, GreenReaper said:

Wait, they rigged the election for a Democratic president and then handed the House and Senate to Democrats to make it appear legitimate?  Wouldn't that make it look less legitimate?

Gimme a break. I was on a call when I wrote that. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.