March 20, 20242 yr 16 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: Plan? Biden didn't know anything about a plan. He was in a dementia fog until two weeks before the deadline and still lied and said Afghanistan wouldn't fall. Yes, the agreement Trump made with the Taliban. The one you want to pretend was not his. For the record, both Trump and Biden royally Fed this up. The military advised BOTH that the plan sucked and would cause problems. Looks like they were right. The Trump plan sucked, and the Biden implementation sucked just as bad. See how easy it is?
March 20, 20242 yr 3 hours ago, toolg said: F your feelings. Well thought out response as expected. As I said earlier, not my feelings.
March 20, 20242 yr 2 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Do you think, and I'm just spitballing here, that it might have something to do with Fox news and it's crazier cousins pumping out endless political propaganda about how the world is going to hell because Trump isn't president? It would be grand to get back to a time where everybody didn't believe that the world was on razor's edge and that every election was an existential threat to the nation. I think Fox News, Newsmax, etc. targets one group and CNN, CNBC, etc. target the other. I don't think there are a lot on the left that watch Fox for it's honesty and vice versa. A percentage in each group believe what 'their' favorite news outlet has to say and then there are the (hopefully) middle majority that understand that things aren't as bad, or as good, as the 'news' outlets want you to believe. The world isn't going to go to hell in the next 4 years because one or the other is president. The world didn't end when Trump was president and it didn't end when Biden was president and it's not likely to end in the next 4 years due to either of these clowns. It would be nice to get back to a time you mentioned but it's not happening in the short term as both sides employ the same fear tactics.
March 20, 20242 yr 2 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: There's far less than you're apparently willing to admit. The only real thing that's changed is that instead of Romney as your most recent standard bearer you have a scumbag con artist who's duped 60% of Republican voters into think he actually cares about them and that he's the only one who can fix things. That last part, the "I'm the strong guy and the only one who can fix things," is a little too on the Germany 1933 nose. And Biden who thinks he's the only one who can save the world from Trump is so much different I suppose.
March 20, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenReaper said: And Biden who thinks he's the only one who can save the world from Trump is so much different I suppose. Biden has never said that. Literally nobody has said that Biden is the only candidate who can beat Trump. What Biden is, is the sitting president and presumptive nominee.
March 20, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, Mike31mt said: Yeah the "Trump will end our democracy" schtick isn't fear mongering at all Change 10 more bedpans and get back to us
March 20, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, VanHammersly said: Well, yes, obviously now that we're out of Afghanistan we're not in an active conflict and can't lose troops in said conflict. What a weird way to say 'thanks Biden' If not for Trump who knows how many deaths there would be now. We'd certainly still be there, that's for sure. Biden would be so much closer to his foreign conflict continental grand slam.
March 20, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, Mike31mt said: Yeah the "Trump will end our democracy" schtick isn't fear mongering at all "Donald Trump says he will be a 'dictator' only on 'day one.' Then he'll focus on drilling.” But only on day one. He will piece the Constitution back together after he uses it to wipe his 🫏. 😂😂😂😂😂
March 21, 20242 yr 19 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Biden has never said that. Literally nobody has said that Biden is the only candidate who can beat Trump. What Biden is, is the sitting president and presumptive nominee. "If Trump wasn't running, I'm not sure I'd be running,” Biden said at a campaign fundraiser in the Boston area. "But we cannot let him win.” Not sure what this implies then.
March 21, 20242 yr 12 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: "If Trump wasn't running, I'm not sure I'd be running,” Biden said at a campaign fundraiser in the Boston area. "But we cannot let him win.” Not sure what this implies then. It implies nothing. He already beat Trump and he is the incumbent. Saying as much is not the same as saying "I'm the only guy who can beat Trump", but a smart guy like you already knew that, right?
March 21, 20242 yr 33 minutes ago, GreenReaper said: "If Trump wasn't running, I'm not sure I'd be running,” Biden said at a campaign fundraiser in the Boston area. "But we cannot let him win.” Not sure what this implies then. The incumbent stepping down would result in a potentially messy nomination process. It's less predictable. Interpreting the above as "I'm the only one who can beat Trump" is a hell of a logical leap.
March 21, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: The incumbent stepping down would result in a potentially messy nomination process. It's less predictable. Interpreting the above as "I'm the only one who can beat Trump" is a hell of a logical leap. That would be true whether or not Trump was running. It has nothing to do with what he said.
March 21, 20242 yr 8 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: The incumbent stepping down would result in a potentially messy nomination process. It's less predictable. Interpreting the above as "I'm the only one who can beat Trump" is a hell of a logical leap. How does what Trump does have any bearing on what Biden does? Wouldn't it be a mess if he stepped down either way?
March 21, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: That would be true whether or not Trump was running. It has nothing to do with what he said. Biden has already proven he is capable of beating Trump. His opponent can't say the reverse.
March 21, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenReaper said: How does what Trump does have any bearing on what Biden does? Wouldn't it be a mess if he stepped down either way? Biden beat Trump. Trump lost to Biden. Knowing those two hard facts, which seems the most logical to replace?
March 21, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, Boogyman said: Biden has already proven he is capable of beating Trump. His opponent can't say the reverse. This also has nothing to do with what Biden said, which is exactly as GreenReaper interpreted it. In fact your statement lends to proving Biden meant that he thinks he's the only one who can beat Trump. Just admit you were wrong and move on.
March 21, 20242 yr Just now, Mike31mt said: This also has nothing to do with what Biden said, which is exactly as GreenReaper interpreted it. In fact your statement lends to proving Biden meant that he thinks he's the only one who can beat Trump. Just admit you were wrong and move on. All it means is he knows he can beat him, which is true because he already has. That's not the same as saying he is the only person who can beat him lol. Stay wrong and double down on it as usual, Slappy.
March 21, 20242 yr 32 minutes ago, Boogyman said: All it means is he knows he can beat him, which is true because he already has. That's not the same as saying he is the only person who can beat him lol. Stay wrong and double down on it as usual, Slappy. If that's what he meant, that's what he would have said. Instead he said, "if Trump wasn't running I'm not sure If be running." Meaning, he feels the need to run since Trump is running. Why? Because he thinks no one else can beat Trump.
March 21, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, GreenReaper said: "If Trump wasn't running, I'm not sure I'd be running,” Biden said at a campaign fundraiser in the Boston area. "But we cannot let him win.” Not sure what this implies then. Biden, as an incumbent who has already beaten Trump, has the best chance of beating Trump again considering the circumstances. Him stepping down against an opponent he's already beaten, represents an unneccesary risk given how dangerous and detestable Trump has proven to be. The person with the best chance to win =/= the only person who can win Hope that helps
March 21, 20242 yr Just now, we_gotta_believe said: Biden, as an incumbent who has already beaten Trump, has the best chance of beating Trump again considering the circumstances. Him stepping down against an opponent he's already beaten, represents an unneccesary risk given how dangerous and detestable Trump has proven to be. The person with the best chance to win =/= the only person who can win Hope that helps Why would it be a risk?
March 21, 20242 yr Just now, Mike31mt said: Why would it be a risk? For the same reason throwing a slant at the goal line in the super bowl is a risk when you've had BeastMode pounding the rock all game for over 100yds and a TD already.
March 21, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, Mike31mt said: If that's what he meant, that's what he would have said. Instead he said, "if Trump wasn't running I'm not sure If be running." Meaning, he feels the need to run since Trump is running. Why? Because he thinks no one else can beat Trump. Because he already beat him lmao. Why run an unknown if you have a guy already in office who has beaten the oppositions candidate? If the GOP nominated a different candidate, than that know quantity wouldn't exist and perhaps Biden wouldn't be running. None of that is even close to saying "Only I can beat Trump", that's just a dumb reach on your part.
Create an account or sign in to comment