May 1May 1 1 hour ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Accusations should always be taken seriously, and I'm not one to judge a book by its cover, but come onnnn.
May 1May 1 22 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:Accusations should always be taken seriously, and I'm not one to judge a book by its cover, but come onnnn.Yeah, my post was really just a meme for the lulz.That said, this tracks awfully close to "she's not hot enough for Trump to sexually assault" territory, just on the other foot.To be sure...But still....
May 1May 1 9 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Yeah, my post was really just a meme for the lulz.That said, this tracks awfully close to "she's not hot enough for Trump to sexually assault" territory, just on the other foot.To be sure...But still....I know, but Trump is a grotesque creature and far more disgusting than any of his accusers. Just seems like quite the leap to believe this JP Morgan executive would risk her career to rape this chode looking dude. Someone that attractive in her position could have a thousand sex slaves lined up around the block.
May 1May 1 1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:I know, but Trump is a grotesque creature and far more disgusting than any of his accusers. Just seems like quite the leap to believe this JP Morgan executive would risk her career to rape this chode looking dude. Someone that attractive in her position could have a thousand sex slaves lined up around the block.Usually, especially for women in these roles, it's about power. And the power imbalance magnifies that Some men feel more powerful when an attractive woman is submissive.Some women feel more powerful when they can force a man to be submissive. And attractive women who are used to being able to use their looks AND positions to assert power can get particularly vicious if they're rebuffed.I'm not saying that's what happened. But looks tend to be less important to women.
May 1May 1 40 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:And attractive women who are used to being able to use their looks AND positions to assert power can get particularly vicious if they're rebuffed.I'm not saying that's what happened. But looks tend to be less important to women.Not a snowball's chance in hell that goofy looking dude rebuffed someone like her.
May 1May 1 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:Not a snowball's chance in hell that goofy looking dude rebuffed someone like her.It's completely fabricated apparently. JPM did an internal investigation, and the "victim" refused to cooperate. He demanded millions as a settlement as well. He's already retracted the court filing. Looks like this woman's reputation got slammed for no reason.
May 1May 1 1 hour ago, we_gotta_believe said:I know, but Trump is a grotesque creature and far more disgusting than any of his accusers. Just seems like quite the leap to believe this JP Morgan executive would risk her career to rape this chode looking dude. Someone that attractive in her position could have a thousand sex slaves lined up around the block.I don't care enough to go back, but didn't one of those tweets have a user comment how he provided no evidence and also he wasn't her subordinate, therefore she had no power over his bonuses\pay raises?If so, it's likely a BS story and she's going to have a hell of a lawsuit to file against him.
May 1May 1 8 minutes ago, paco said:I don't care enough to go back, but didn't one of those tweets have a user comment how he provided no evidence and also he wasn't her subordinate, therefore she had no power over his bonuses\pay raises?If so, it's likely a BS story and she's going to have a hell of a lawsuit to file against him.The Post reported last night that he didn't report to her and she had no influence on his career.
May 1May 1 17 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Weird flex for someone accused of sexual assaultYeah, because that’s totally what happened.
May 1May 1 1 minute ago, The_Omega said:Yeah, because that’s totally what happened. Look, it's great that it looks bogus and she got exonerated.Still a weird flex.
May 1May 1 2 hours ago, paco said:I don't care enough to go back, but didn't one of those tweets have a user comment how he provided no evidence and also he wasn't her subordinate, therefore she had no power over his bonuses\pay raises?If so, it's likely a BS story and she's going to have a hell of a lawsuit to file against him.Not sure, but solely going off the photo of their faces threw up some red flags. I get that office dynamics can create for some interesting "tensions" in either direction, but the one in a position of power looks to be on the younger side and attractive, and that supposed victim looks like he was a virgin until he paid a prostitute in his late twenties.
May 1May 1 4 hours ago, we_gotta_believe said:I know, but Trump is a grotesque creature and far more disgusting than any of his accusers. Just seems like quite the leap to believe this JP Morgan executive would risk her career to rape this chode looking dude. Someone that attractive in her position could have a thousand sex slaves lined up around the block.4 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Usually, especially for women in these roles, it's about power. And the power imbalance magnifies thatSome men feel more powerful when an attractive woman is submissive.Some women feel more powerful when they can force a man to be submissive.And attractive women who are used to being able to use their looks AND positions to assert power can get particularly vicious if they're rebuffed.I'm not saying that's what happened. But looks tend to be less important to women.You guys have to have ugly wives. Just sayin....
Create an account or sign in to comment