3 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

What a dunce, and you seem proud of it .

1 minute ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

I was just using them in general as like a Super Bowl contending team. I think Green Bay makes a ton of sense. They need a slot wide receiver with Adams and Scantling on the outside. And I’m guessing at this stage of his career probably cheat. I also wouldn’t be surprised if the Kansas City Chiefs make a run at him as well since Sammy Watkins is going to be gone. Hill and hardman are outside wide receivers where as they could use a slot guy

They need to lock up Godwin , probably a franchise tag , and AB , Brady’s buddy

5 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

If there was a game I had to win, today, I’d want Wentz first, Goff second, Dak third.

Dak isn’t a winner and has never won bupkis — now c’mon Jerry, fork over that $40M contract 

I don’t know. I kind of disagree with that. Dak Prescott won a playoff game against Russell Wilson which is something to Eagles have not been able to do is beat the Seahawks and Russell Wilson. Add on if it wasn’t for a incredible throw by Aaron Rodgers to Jared Cook they’re probably playing in the 2016 NFC championship game. 

Just now, hputenis said:

You wear it well , be proud of yourself .

14 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Feels like he’s going to go to be the player that goes to tampa or like Green Bay and try to win a title. 

The Colts might be a spot for him.

1 minute ago, CaliEagle said:

The Colts might be a spot for him.

I wonder if Frank can figure out how to fit him in an offense 

3 minutes ago, CaliEagle said:

The Colts might be a spot for him.

I would also include the ravens and the Chiefs as teams I could see him going to if he’s trying to just win a title.

10 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

I wonder if Frank can figure out how to fit him in an offense 

Also not sure if he would try to smash Wentz's wife, so the Colts are probably off his list.  

2 hours ago, Original Sin said:

If raising  minimal wage to 15 per hour hurts small business , they’re in the wrong business 

it will weed out the weak , capitalism at its finest 

it only seems like a big increase , because it’s been stagnant for years and years

 

There is no reason for it whatsoever. 

5 hours ago, justrelax said:

or the ending to A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court. Electrocuted bodies rotting on the wires as the hero and his minions choke to death on the stench. Not exactly the Bing Crosby version.

Thanks for the spoiler. 😒

Oh, and can beast get banned already? Still trolling after all these years and some of you nitwits still reply to him. SMDH

58 minutes ago, hputenis said:

Was that before or after you were banned?  Guess we'll never know.  

He actually did...a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while.

6 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

There is no reason for it whatsoever. 

Cosco says it minimizes turnover and maximizes  productivity , I guess they would know , seeings as they currently pay 15 per hour and will be raising it to 16 per hour .

3 minutes ago, Westbrook#36 said:

Oh, and can beast get banned already? Still trolling after all these years and some of you nitwits still reply to him. SMDH

Grow up , childish trolling claims , you sound like a insecure sissy 

7 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

Cosco says it minimizes turnover and maximizes  productivity , I guess they would know , seeings as they currently pay 15 per hour and will be raising it to 16 per hour .

 

You know why?  Because that is a higher paying job than the minimum wage.  Your raise the minimum wage and suddenly those people that were feeling good about working at Cosco making $15-$16 an hour are now suddenly making minimum wage or close to it.  You know who isn't liking that minimum wage hike?  Those folks working at Cosco.  

I will never forgive Golden Tate for short-arming that pass in New Orleans. It was a great deep pass from Foles and he just choose not to go for it.

11 minutes ago, Wentz_Era said:

He actually did...a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while.

Is this still about Dak?  He isn’t the best of that class and never has been.

Who’s to say Wentz and Goff don’t come out ahead after their trades?  I know DET is unlikely to ever be a good team because they haven’t been for 40 years, but let’s not act like Dak is suddenly a world beater because he hasn’t been traded — yet.

15 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

You know why?  Because that is a higher paying job than the minimum wage.  Your raise the minimum wage and suddenly those people that were feeling good about working at Cosco making $15-$16 an hour are now suddenly making minimum wage or close to it.  You know who isn't liking that minimum wage hike?  Those folks working at Cosco.  

How is 7.25 per hour beneficial to those earning it ? And 7.25 per isn’t just being paid to  16 year olds with summer jobs .

 

minimum wage has been 7.25 for the last 12 years , that is just wrong .

12 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

How is 7.25 per hour beneficial to those earning it ? And 7.25 per isn’t just being paid to  16 year olds with summer jobs .

 

minimum wage has been 7.25 for the last 12 years , that is just wrong .

It’s called work hard to get a raise/promotion or do something else. Plenty of opportunities in this country. 

6 hours ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Geeez in mid 2000s in Arizona in state tuition was $2000 a semester. It’s jumped to $10000. But Villanova is an awesome school but damn $200000 is steep. 

What happens when you subsidize demand...

16 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

How is 7.25 per hour beneficial to those earning it ? And 7.25 per isn’t just being paid to  16 year olds with summer jobs .

 

minimum wage has been 7.25 for the last 12 years , that is just wrong .

False

its completely right

5 minutes ago, ToastJenkins said:

False

its completely right

Explain why , I’ll wait

26 minutes ago, Original Sin said:

How is 7.25 per hour beneficial to those earning it ? And 7.25 per isn’t just being paid to  16 year olds with summer jobs .

 

minimum wage has been 7.25 for the last 12 years , that is just wrong .

Pretty sure no one starts their employees at that rate these days and haven't probably for several years

It's easy to say, "Hey, if you don't like the minimum wage, don't work a minimum wage job." But what does that mean for all the people who have to work minimum jobs? We all shop at places where workers are paid minimum wage. Do we still want that service? 

Billion dollar companies who pay their workers minimum wage are inexcusable. It's worker exploitation. No one should ever be expected to work a job 40-hours a week and get paid 7 dollars for each hour.

It amazes me that people regurgitate the same nonsense when defending it.

Just now, Bwestbrook36 said:

Pretty sure no one starts their employees at that rate these days and haven't probably for several years

What’s the problem with raising it to 15 then ?

And I have a business , all hourly employees, no salary .