October 5, 20214 yr 8 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Laughing at your stupidity is more of a pass time than a role. Who the hell do you think you're kidding? The only way you could be any dumber is if your mothers first cousin got there before your old man did.
October 5, 20214 yr 48 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Laughing at your stupidity is more of a pass time than a role. "pastime" 😒
October 5, 20214 yr A balanced look at natural vs. vaccine immunity. His conclusion is that natural immunity alone is greater than immunity from vaccination alone BUT having both gives the greatest benefit though of course with some increase in risks of complications from the vaccine. He also concludes that there is no practical way of handling each person individually for a large country such as the US and therefore the broad "vaccinate everyone" approach is logical. In other words, even though natural immunity is very strong and even though it is likely to last longer than immunity through vaccination alone, it is optimal to have as many people vaccinated as possible.
October 5, 20214 yr 8 hours ago, DEagle7 said: Womp womp https://www.wect.com/2021/10/04/covid-19-patient-treated-with-ivermectin-dies-attorney-says/ Thanks for posting this. As a physician, you understand that treatment must be administered EARLY. This patient was already in ICU and his body was already ravaged by the effects of Covid. As an attorney, the job of the guy in the article is to create an appearance of liability and increased litigating hazards to maximize financial recovery. With all the publicity around this case, it's also free advertising. I wish the family well, and hope they can recover against the hospital for withholding life saving treatment until it was too late. The best way to put this crisis to an end is in the courtroom. Let a few quacks and hospitals successfully be sued for malpractice on account of withholding life saving treatment like Ivermectin, and you'll see this turn around on a dime like what happened in Uttar Pradesh, India.
October 5, 20214 yr 28 minutes ago, Procus said: Thanks for posting this. As a physician, you understand that treatment must be administered EARLY. This patient was already in ICU and his body was already ravaged by the effects of Covid. As an attorney, the job of the guy in the article is to create an appearance of liability and increased litigating hazards to maximize financial recovery. With all the publicity around this case, it's also free advertising. I wish the family well, and hope they can recover against the hospital for withholding life saving treatment until it was too late. The best way to put this crisis to an end is in the courtroom. Let a few quacks and hospitals successfully be sued for malpractice on account of withholding life saving treatment like Ivermectin, and you'll see this turn around on a dime like what happened in Uttar Pradesh, India. So it's easier for you to believe that our health system is withholding life-saving treatment, and extending a costly and deadly pandemic rather than believing that you just might be wrong?
October 5, 20214 yr 8 hours ago, lynched1 said: "pastime" 😒 pWn3d This is why I try to avoid correcting grammar on here. Because I know they’re eventually going to get me.
October 5, 20214 yr 20 minutes ago, Lloyd said: So it's easier for you to believe that our health system is withholding life-saving treatment, and extending a costly and deadly pandemic rather than believing that you just might be wrong? That's what it means to be MAGA. It's a full on repudiation of Occam's Razor and detachment from reality.
October 5, 20214 yr 8 hours ago, lynched1 said: "pastime" 😒 2 hours and a second attempt later. Atta boy
October 5, 20214 yr 54 minutes ago, Procus said: Thanks for posting this. As a physician, you understand that treatment must be administered EARLY. This patient was already in ICU and his body was already ravaged by the effects of Covid. As an attorney, the job of the guy in the article is to create an appearance of liability and increased litigating hazards to maximize financial recovery. With all the publicity around this case, it's also free advertising. I wish the family well, and hope they can recover against the hospital for withholding life saving treatment until it was too late. The best way to put this crisis to an end is in the courtroom. Let a few quacks and hospitals successfully be sued for malpractice on account of withholding life saving treatment like Ivermectin, and you'll see this turn around on a dime like what happened in Uttar Pradesh, India. Thank you for this important health news release from your cult. You're a bunch of whack-doodles. I do agree though, Trump supporters should be dewormed.
October 5, 20214 yr Ted Nugent called me a sheep. How will I ever get over it? LOL Coming from someone who was diagnosed with a serious disease and is doing well I'm here to tell you it's all a crap shoot. Seen it with covid too. Perfectly healthy people getting really sick, and some have died. What I don't understand is people absolutely digging in their heels and not listening to logic. Vaccines have ALWAYS been the way out of epidemics and pandemics. It's really discouraging to see such division. I'd also like to say I have no issue hearing about different treatment options. I totally get that. When you're sick and in danger of dying you will try anything. It's a survival instinct. That's not what's happening here though. Not even close. Sad. I'm tired of being sad.
October 5, 20214 yr 14 hours ago, Procus said: Why don't you explain to my buddy Simon why he felt better from his Covid infection two hours after taking Ivermectin that it was all in his head as your studies say that didn't happen. You should also explain that to the doctor who prescribed it to him because your research shows that it didn't work. Lol. You named your imaginary friend Simon. Lmao.
October 5, 20214 yr Recently published study (so not necessarily peer reviewed, I'll give that caveat even if others don't): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015 The goal here was to determine if there are longer term side effects of mRNA vaccines. The short of it is: there aren't. It studied negative effects within the first three weeks after vaccine to any effects subsequently and found no more likelihood of negative effects 4-6 weeks out vs 1-3.
October 5, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, Lloyd said: So it's easier for you to believe that our health system is withholding life-saving treatment, and extending a costly and deadly pandemic rather than believing that you just might be wrong? It's not a matter of easy, it's a matter of the truth. Is it easier for you to believe that our entire way of life should be disrupted and destroyed by a virus with a survival rate in excess of 99%? Shall I mention the number of ways? Locking down the healthy - effectively putting them under house arrest? Shuttering numerous businesses? Denying treatment during the early stages of this to people with sicknesses other than Covid because hospitals were closed? Massive government handouts to individuals and businesses as a result of lockdowns and lockouts causing significant inflation that shows no signs of abating? This is for starters - but hey, you go trust politicians. Go ahead. They're honest and have our best interests at heart. They'd never sell out to special interests . . .
October 5, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Recently published study (so not necessarily peer reviewed, I'll give that caveat even if others don't): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015 The goal here was to determine if there are longer term side effects of mRNA vaccines. The short of it is: there aren't. It studied negative effects within the first three weeks after vaccine to any effects subsequently and found no more likelihood of negative effects 4-6 weeks out vs 1-3. Yah, let's conclude there are no LONG TERM EFFECTS from a vaccine that's been in use for LESS THAN A YEAR and already requires boosters. But hey, there's an internet link, so it must be true . . .
October 5, 20214 yr 8 minutes ago, Boogyman said: Lol. You named your imaginary friend Simon. Lmao. Yah, he's imaginary. That's the ticket . . . 50 minutes ago, mayanh8 said: That's what it means to be MAGA. It's a full on repudiation of Occam's Razor and detachment from reality. Hey - how's your kid doing? Hope he/she's okay and fully recovered.
October 5, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Procus said: Yah, let's conclude there are no LONG TERM EFFECTS from a vaccine that's been in use for LESS THAN A YEAR and already requires boosters. But hey, there's an internet link, so it must be true . . . In addition to the link, my buddies Eugene, Sheldon and Calton all confirmed this is legit.
October 5, 20214 yr 5 minutes ago, Procus said: Yah, he's imaginary. That's the ticket . . . So by using that meme you are acknowledging you made Simon up? Because that character was always making things up in those skits.
October 5, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, Boogyman said: So by using that meme you are acknowledging you made Simon up? Because that character was always making things up in those skits.
October 5, 20214 yr 13 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: Recently published study (so not necessarily peer reviewed, I'll give that caveat even if others don't): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015 The goal here was to determine if there are longer term side effects of mRNA vaccines. The short of it is: there aren't. It studied negative effects within the first three weeks after vaccine to any effects subsequently and found no more likelihood of negative effects 4-6 weeks out vs 1-3. Wow a whole six weeks? What a great long term study!
October 5, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, Procus said: Yup another fraud. You got nothing as usual. Go ahead, post it again.
October 5, 20214 yr Just now, Boogyman said: Yup another fraud. You got nothing as usual. Go ahead, post it again. How's your anti-mask family doing with the flu outbreak? I hope you didn't spread anything to the high risk folks out there, you inconsiderate jerk!
October 5, 20214 yr 12 minutes ago, Procus said: Yah, let's conclude there are no LONG TERM EFFECTS from a vaccine that's been in use for LESS THAN A YEAR and already requires boosters. But hey, there's an internet link, so it must be true . . .
October 5, 20214 yr 4 minutes ago, mikemack8 said: How's your anti-mask family doing with the flu outbreak? I hope you didn't spread anything to the high risk folks out there, you inconsiderate jerk! We all stayed home while sick like a person should. Also stop trying so hard. It's a pretty bad look.
Create an account or sign in to comment