12 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I never trusted Chipper

point is we are stuck with whomever, your trust or mine doesn't matter

13 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Traded for Big Play Slay. Added Harris. Drafted McPherson. Signed Nelson. Drafted Wallace.

He looked toasted to finish last season

Other than Slay,who is a difference maker???? Just adding middle of the road guys is not "investing" IMO.Yeah kinda of surprised the Squeelers didn't make a move last off season. Ben looks beat up lol and IDK if they drafted anyone for next year

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Other than Slay,who is a difference maker???? Just adding middle of the road guys is not "investing" IMO.Yeah kinda of surprised the Squeelers didn't make a move last off season. Ben looks beat up lol and IDK if they drafted anyone for next year

I mean think it’s to early to tell on Wallace and Zech… im personally really high on Wallace.

But definitely have not used premium resources at CB and when we did were complete flops Sidney Jones 

Hurts, Kelce, Graham, Singleton, McCloudand Cox named Team Captains

S Riley, WR Hightower, T Leraven and RB Howard have been protected Week one on PS

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/why-the-eagles-rushing-attack-has-the-potential-to-dominate-kc-joyner/ar-AAObYmr

https://www.nfl.com/players/dontae-johnson/stats/  Nice vet presence,even as a BU. He's 29 maybe a year or 2 left,but could improve the room slightly. I'd go a year show me on him. Can't be alot worse than what we have until these younger guys can step up

On 9/7/2021 at 6:57 AM, Trini said:

The distinction to me is familiarity with the player having being an active part of that players development...Touted to be able to play Inside, outside, even Safety. 

Just some advice if you expect to win consistently in Fantasy leave your Eagle bias at the door unless we fielded a SureFire SB contender. like BG93 I am familiar with Computer Drafts... Had some success with some computer picks also  and some real Suck Ass teams. In Fantsy weekly you look to improve your roster.ESPECIALLY ...if you Auto Pick Computer draft.

Neither has done anything...hope we don't have to find out late in the season and our main guys stay the main guys on the field.

Thanks for the advice. I probably shouldn’t play fantasy then.

1 hour ago, Senhorcook said:

Thanks for the advice. I probably shouldn’t play fantasy then.

Every team has a good player(s). As you fantasy draft you take the best you can. In one league I had to take ZEKE(ugh) so there is a conflict of interest there lol.I hope he runs for 400 yards a game with 450 yards of penalties and no TD's

On ‎9‎/‎7‎/‎2021 at 11:09 PM, EaglesTD123 said:

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/why-the-eagles-rushing-attack-has-the-potential-to-dominate-kc-joyner/ar-AAObYmr

  I love it when people write this team has the "Potential" to do this or that. You rarely see them say that about a SB contender. Only teams with little expectations......

On ‎9‎/‎7‎/‎2021 at 5:25 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

If we are QB shopping next draft,we will have to compete with the Squeelers. Ben is 39 and takes too many hits

  I really do not want to spend 3 draft picks for a QB next year. That would really suck. IF Hurts is not the Answer, I hope we end up with less than 4 wins.... Then we can grab someone without giving away the farm....

10 minutes ago, stine said:

  I really do not want to spend 3 draft picks for a QB next year. That would really suck. IF Hurts is not the Answer, I hope we end up with less than 4 wins.... Then we can grab someone without giving away the farm....

I just don’t want to trade all those picks for a Trey Lance type situation. This past draft was crazy. Bears gave up a bunch for Fields also.

16 minutes ago, stine said:

  I really do not want to spend 3 draft picks for a QB next year. That would really suck. IF Hurts is not the Answer, I hope we end up with less than 4 wins.... Then we can grab someone without giving away the farm....

Yeah but we have a few trade pieces now, so maybe 1 plus a player or our 1 and a 2 to move, but we have plenty of ammo to do what we want 

8 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I just don’t want to trade all those picks for a Trey Lance type situation. This past draft was crazy. Bears gave up a bunch for Fields also.

How do we know that's a bad deal until he plays???? They will ride Dalton until he chokes,then we will find out if it was a bad trade or not. What's wrong with the "Trey Lance" situation? Educate me 

2 hours ago, stine said:

  I love it when people write this team has the "Potential" to do this or that. You rarely see them say that about a SB contender. Only teams with little expectations......

LMAO me too. It also has to potential to NOT dominate. I also have the potential to hit the megaball pot

LeVon Bell on the Ravens PS. Is Bell > Howard? Asking for a friend

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

How do we know that's a bad deal until he plays???? They will ride Dalton until he chokes,then we will find out if it was a bad trade or not. What's wrong with the "Trey Lance" situation? Educate me 

I believe most wanted to get up and take Lawrence. They weren’t going to trade. Getting the second best(Wentz pick) was maybe achievable. Cool….go for that. But when the Jets wouldn’t trade….forget it. Lance could be good. But he has so much going against him. Not much experience. Even that experience is in lesser college football level. So nah….I was thinking more like the Pats.

Basically you have this guy in Mac that had great experience at the highest level of college ball. Or Lance that’s athletic and talented…but only a few games in division 3. I was leaning Mac if I was the Niners. 

I don’t believe the Niners just sit Lance either. I suspect he comes right in before halftime even if his first game.

Latest roster move here. Good or bad? IDK

Signed LB Christian Elliss to the practice squad and released C Ross Pierschbacher from the practice squad.

https://www.philadelphiaeagles.com/news/eagles-sign-lb-christian-elliss-to-the-practice-squad

17 games and all the likely records that will fall NFl and even franchise records 

Idk guess to me I will have to have that * next to it though with the aid of an extra game.

Guess it really is no different from when it went from 14 games to 16 and all the records that fell after the switch. 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Lance could be good. But he has so much going against him. Not much experience. Even that experience is in lesser college football level. So nah….I was thinking more like the Pats.

He also has so much going for him Lawrence and Wilson are going to terrible teams… Lance is 20 youngest of them and landing on probably the best team all around. 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Basically you have this guy in Mac that had great experience at the highest level of college ball. Or Lance that’s athletic and talented…but only a few games in division 3. I was leaning Mac if I was the Niners. 

But you also have Mac who has the best supporting cast in all of college football vs Lance who played D1 football 

Mac Jones 17 starts in college 

Lance 17 starts in college.

Competition level were clearly different and that is valid but the supporting casts were vastly different as well. Mac was throwing to Smith Heisman trophy winning WR Lance was throwing to??? 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I believe most wanted to get up and take Lawrence. They weren’t going to trade. Getting the second best(Wentz pick) was maybe achievable. Cool….go for that. But when the Jets wouldn’t trade….forget it. Lance could be good. But he has so much going against him. Not much experience. Even that experience is in lesser college football level. So nah….I was thinking more like the Pats.

Used to be the norm that drafted QB's would sit a year or 2,now we except them all to perform on day 1? It used to be called paying your dues and working your way up. Neither of us have a clue how good Lance will be(or Fields, Mac Jones, or Lawrence). To say it's a good or bad move is ludicrous. The situation in Green Bay is MUCH worse,because this will be year TWO for him. SO here is a scenario and I want to hear your opinion. Say this team performs well, a little above average, and next year would can pay big bucks and get Aaron Rodgers,do you pull that trigger?(AKA all draft picks still intact too). Or do you take a top QB in the draft? Or do you do nothing at all and ride hurts even though he is "average". We spent little loot this year(none on WR's for a change),so which path is the "right" path in your opinion?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Basically you have this guy in Mac that had great experience at the highest level of college ball. Or Lance that’s athletic and talented…but only a few games in division 3. I was leaning Mac if I was the Niners. 

Slow, accurate, needs an awesome O line, not a  RUNNER. Mac is an exact copy of a young Tom Brady(and I suspect Belicheat saw this too)