40 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

2 LB's Iike in 3(despite 93's false claim that I name everyone lmao) are Browning  and Cox. Like them both about the same

I think it was a lighthearted attempt at some humor... you do post a lot of names,  which is all good. 

37 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s some extreme Foles hatred. Foles has some really hot moments here.

Yes... perfect way to put it... hot moments.  

2013 Foles threw 27 TDs with only 2 interceptions with a QB rating of 119

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

2 LB's Iike in 3(despite 93's false claim that I name everyone lmao) are Browning  and Cox. Like them both about the same

You do post a lot of players brother. Which I like and I'm SURE everyone else likes to see your angle. Keep it up man!

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

As a side note... is LB ever NOT on our list of needs? 

LMAO no NEVER, that is penciled in annually

57 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

You do post a lot of players brother. Which I like and I'm SURE everyone else likes to see your angle. Keep it up man!

LOL well I have a list,but some move up the boards,so then I need to take them, out where I had them. I could put them back at a later spot though,but then when i take them out I need to find another guy there right? Of course, it's all moot, because we know we have Howie who loves those players on nobodys mock ever

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LOL well I have a list,but some move up the boards,so then I need to take them, out where I had them. I could put them back at a later spot though,but then when i take them out I need to find another guy there right?

Very understandable. Reason for my post : )

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

2013 Foles threw 27 TDs with only 2 interceptions with a QB rating of 119

2017 Wentz had 33 TDs 7 ints And a Qb rating of 101 in 13 games

2018 had 21 TDs 7 ints and a QB rating of 102 in 11 games

What's your point?

2 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

2017 Wentz had 33 TDs 7 ints And a Qb rating of 101

2018 had 21 TDs 7 ints and a QB rating of 102 in 11 games

What's your point?

My point was Foles wasn’t just good against teams missing DBs

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My point was Foles wasn’t just good against teams missing DBs

Who said he was?

he is just the most streaky QB i've ever seen

It's also inconsistent to point out the 1 good year of Foles while slamming Wentz all winter for his 1 bad year when Wentz had years on par with Foles best.

1 minute ago, Asg 15 said:

Who said he was?

he is just the most streaky QB i've ever seen

It's also inconsistent to point out the 1 good year of Foles while slamming Wentz all winter for his 1 bad year when Wentz had years on par with Foles best.

That was my response to No Mas quote stating such

43 minutes ago, Asg 15 said:

Who said he was?

he is just the most streaky QB i've ever seen

It's also inconsistent to point out the 1 good year of Foles while slamming Wentz all winter for his 1 bad year when Wentz had years on par with Foles best.

My op- Foles is an excellent GAME manager, and I still feel we won the SB because A)we got that far then B) EVERYONE else on the team kicked it up a notch knowing Foles was not Wentz and they had to give 100+% and we were close enough to give it a shot.. IDK I just can't call Foles a starting QB. Apparently Jax found that out also

57 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

Very understandable. Reason for my post : )

I guess I'm kind of waiting around to see what moves we make in FA. Although most say "that shouldn't affect your draft", which I also agree with,on the other hand it can buy you a year,so say for instance we signed Mack at RB. That would pretty much buy us a year, so I would probably remove my RB pick on my mock. I am looking back at some REAL BONEHEAD moves like why did we re-sign Howard???? Who did JP talk into paying him more money??? and WHY did we do it??? That BS drives me insane

Well as y'all know I am all in on Pitts. I also like the balance of my mock but I am having problems with the 37 and 70 choices, so that is why all the names pop up lol. I'm trying to get an edge guy in there, but possibly that's where my thinking is wrong. I'm not sold on Barnett and Howie seems to like his edge rushing picks, even though(see the Barnett pick) he seems to pick guys that are "projects" too high, because in my view that's all Barnett has shown me,that he is a project. We also see "projects" with guys like Hollins and now Jjaw and I really think Howie reaches when there are better players around. IDK who I was talking to about Cincy(think is was TTR). I like Grant at S at 70,but then again I find guys like Wiggins from the Bearcats and he makes me wanna say "hold off" lol

https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4044064/james-wiggins  

IDK I see skills here,but not  in the toughest league either. Still they played some decent enough teams. He has good ball awareness and react time. SUppose it depends on how bad we need a S,but for a round 6 or so I would take a look

1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

My op- Foles is an excellent GAME manager, and I still feel we won the SB because A)we got that far then B) EVERYONE else on the team kicked it up a notch knowing Foles was not Wentz and they had to give 100+% and we were close enough to give it a shot.. IDK I just can't call Foles a starting QB. Apparently Jax found that out also

And the Rams, and Chicago

On a lighter note..............

20 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

On a lighter note..............

You just had to throw some soap opera sh!t in here didn't you? LMAO.  As if we haven't had enough of that

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My point was Foles wasn’t just good against teams missing DBs

Right.... 8 years ago he had a season where the Chip Kelly scheme and tempo was new to the league, one game where the Raiders left everyone open and some INTs dropped with one actually caught that would have lost the game, but a BS penalty negated it.  

Only season ever mentioned that includes the # of interceptions.   Dude gets fired from starting job for scrub QB at every stop he has made.  We are very fortunate he didn't mess up 2017. But any dope with a set of eyes knows he's not a starting QB in this league.  We like him here because he sets the bar for expectations low, harder to be disappointed with low expectations.  

5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That was my response to No Mas quote stating such

Which was correct if you look at 2017 and 2018.  The entire body of work from those 2 years.   Look at all the stats,  ratings or whatever... like 12 games, half the stats come from 2 games.   With a ton of luck involved in some others, including a completion off a defenders knee and a double doink in 2 playoff games where he struggled to do anything.

4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

.. IDK I just can't call Foles a starting QB. Apparently Jax found that out also

So did a quarter of the league. 

When Foles went to Rams is that when the Eagles got Bradford?

  When you look at all of these restructures, it is becoming apparent that HR is trying to make sure Hurts has protection this and next year. Why keep all of these aging men otherwise? I would much rather he cut ties with a couple so we don't have to pay the piper next year or in 2022. This will hurt our chances of rebuilding when you keep pushing the cap space into next year. Sooner or later we are going to have to deal with the devil. Either that or finally draft players that are actually worth keeping....... Another reason we will not go QB this year. May go O-Line though...

Reportedly looking to shop Brooks.

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2021/03/08/report-eagles-have-discussed-brandon-brooks-trade/

I'm definitely down with moving as many overpriced, aging vets on the decline as possible this year.  If they get a fairly decent offer, they should jump on it.