Someone explain this to me... last week both the Vikings and Cowboys were on a bye week.  This week, they match up on SNF, why the heck not on TNF?   🤦‍♂️

 

Well, NFL... 

 

You are stupid.

16 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Also Jets vs Colts Thursday night, will be a game worth tuning into

Jets off a win + Colts off a loss = Feels like a comfortable Colts W. Road Thursday night is rough for the road team too. 

1 minute ago, RLC said:

Jets off a win + Colts off a loss = Feels like a comfortable Colts W. Road Thursday night is rough for the road team too. 

Eagles off a win + Chargers off a loss = ??? 

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

Jets off a win + Colts off a loss = Feels like a comfortable Colts W. Road Thursday night is rough for the road team too. 

Yeah I fully expect Colts to win that game also. But jets have pulled off a couple surprising wins. I’ll be rooting for the Jets

Just now, Iggles_Phan said:

Eagles off a win + Chargers off a loss = ??? 

I'm not sure. Chargers looked very off today. They'll positively regress this week, but they lost some guys on defense. 

It's very different for truly awful teams getting exciting after winning a game 

5 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Someone explain this to me... last week both the Vikings and Cowboys were on a bye week.  This week, they match up on SNF, why the heck not on TNF?   🤦‍♂️

 

Well, NFL... 

 

You are stupid.

Because it’s not Thanksgiving without Cowboys football!
 

barf 

When did Cowboys get Carson Wentz?

2 hours ago, ToastJenkins said:

You have to wean off one before docs will start a different one

yeah. But apparently our team doctors dont know that. Another major F up by our medical staff.

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Because it’s not Thanksgiving without Cowboys football!
 

barf 

Dallas gets a Thursday game in addition to Thanksgiving... and it almost always comes right after the Thanksgiving game... and does again this year.

2 hours ago, Dwide Schrude said:

I know. I’m saying I’m unsure if Eagles will think they need to get CB, especially if they were to extend Nelson and Maddox 

I would love to retain both. And draft one to eventually replace Slay. If he replaces Nelson, and Nelson demands a trade thats an ok problem to have. You get decent return for a decent starting CB.

I think/hope they at least retain Nelson. I can see them letting Maddox go (cap constraints) and assuming Zech can take over the slot role in year 2. 

26 minutes ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Hopefully Houston trades Watson tomorrow to the Dolphins & Tua is traded also. Whatever gives Houston an edge next week 

Watson is better than Tua in his sleep, I’d prefer Tua stays Miami’s QB, and if they have to fire Flores, (hopefully not) they hire Jim Tomsula for the rest of the year, or a descendant of Rich Kotite, either would work. 

1 minute ago, The Blackfish said:

Watson is better than Tua in his sleep, I’d prefer Tua stays Miami’s QB, and if they have to fire Flores, (hopefully not) they hire Jim Tomsula for the rest of the year, or a descendant of Rich Kotite, either would work. 

Not my point. If Watson gets traded tomorrow to the Dolphins, he wouldn’t be starting on Sunday against the Texans. Texans win, meaning Miami will have an edge in draft position over Houston. 

3 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I would love to retain both. And draft one to eventually replace Slay. If he replaces Nelson, and Nelson demands a trade thats an ok problem to have. You get decent return for a decent starting CB.

I think/hope they at least retain Nelson. I can see them letting Maddox go (cap constraints) and assuming Zech can take over the slot role in year 2. 

I’d like both retained and still draft one high, even if they don’t play much their rookie year. I’d also prefer Avonte over Nelson, but I see your logic and I’d be ok with that also.

1 minute ago, Dwide Schrude said:

Not my point. If Watson gets traded tomorrow to the Dolphins, he wouldn’t be starting on Sunday against the Texans. Texans win, meaning Miami will have an edge in draft position over Houston. 

I’d like to see him traded to Mia just so he can’t come here. 

1 minute ago, purplefiggy said:

I’d like to see him traded to Mia just so he can’t come here. 

Same. Want nothing to do with Watson

5 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

I would love to retain both. And draft one to eventually replace Slay. If he replaces Nelson, and Nelson demands a trade thats an ok problem to have. You get decent return for a decent starting CB.

I think/hope they at least retain Nelson. I can see them letting Maddox go (cap constraints) and assuming Zech can take over the slot role in year 2. 

I like McPhearson as a prospect, but we should absolutely use a 1st rounder on a CB in this class. It's a great CB class and both our starting CBs are old. 

It's a matchup league. Chargers don't match up well with the Pats. Lost to them 45-0 last year. Pats running game has gotten very good the last few weeks and the Chargers don't stop the running game. We could possibly have some success running the ball against them.

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

I like McPhearson as a prospect, but we should absolutely use a 1st rounder on a CB in this class. It's a great CB class and both our starting CBs are old. 

I agree that we should. I think theyll use a 1st on an outside CB even if we still have Slay (he wont be here long), and Nelson. I think theyll make a financial decision letting Maddox go in free agency and take their chances with McPhearson in the slot. Potentially, with Nelson and Slay still here the Rookie can play the slot over McPearson also.

9 minutes ago, purplefiggy said:

I’d like to see him traded to Mia just so he can’t come here. 

If he would get traded here I’d be close to just saying F this team and be done with them for the season 

Tyrod Taylor should be back next week. He’s a massive upgrade over Davis Mills. Maybe Miami is ready to pack it in too. 

11 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Who?  Watson?   That’s dumb.  

Lowie giving up a couple 1st round picks for a guy who has 20+ women accusing him of sexual assault… yeah I’d be close to done. 

 

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

 

I'm betting that's bad info. Because once the cases are settled, then in steps Goodell with the suspension. I can't see anyone trading for him before they see how long he's suspended for. He could easily be suspended indefinitely.

1 minute ago, ManuManu said:

 

Can you imagine if after all this hullabaloo, the Texans and Watson patch things up.