54 minutes ago, downundermike said:

Went a little trade crazy @Outlaw @Ray75

 

Why didn’t you take Booth at 51?

13 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

If Goff + next year first + next-next year first = Stafford, then...

Hurts + this year first + next year first = Russell Wilson

Except 2020 Rams does not equal 2021 Eagles. Rams had a highly talented team with a limited window.

3 minutes ago, austinfan said:

Except 2020 Rams does not equal 2021 Eagles. Rams had a highly talented team with a limited window.

Thank god for us Lowie does not care what you think, it is right their in my signature.

I can't see how this FO would pick Safeties or Linebackers rather than Defensive Line in the first round.

Not happening.

 

2 minutes ago, austinfan said:

Except 2020 Rams does not equal 2021 Eagles. Rams had a highly talented team with a limited window.

This is a math class.

Creative writing is down the hall.

2 minutes ago, austinfan said:

Except 2020 Rams does not equal 2021 Eagles. Rams had a highly talented team with a limited window.

The real question here..is he being sincere about the trade. 

2 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

I can't see how this FO would pick Safeties or Linebackers rather than Defensive Line in the first round.

Not happening.

 

This I will agree with. History tends to repeat itself more than not. 

4 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

I can't see how this FO would pick Safeties or Linebackers rather than Defensive Line in the first round.

Not happening.

 

Unfortunately, I think you’re right. They are two of the most neglected positions on this team for a long time and it definitely showed this season. 

5 minutes ago, Connecticut Eagle said:

I can't see how this FO would pick Safeties or Linebackers rather than Defensive Line in the first round.

Not happening.

 

Agreed. R1 will be a mix of DL/OL/CB/WR/QB based on draft history under Lowie. 

The rebrand is going great! 

The Commies

 

Attention @ManuManu

And it begins...

1 hour ago, downundermike said:

Went a little trade crazy @Outlaw @Ray75

 

Zion could play RG this year then be shifted over to C once Kelce hangs em up. 

 

 

2 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

Some fun names in this draft. So far my favorites are "Smoke Monday" and "Big Kat Bryant".

No love for Storm Duck? 

16 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Attention @ManuManu

Had him on my Day 3 radar until I saw his Kenny G locks. 

 

47 minutes ago, Iggles_Phan said:

The carousel continues to spin.

Another opportunity for the JG man. 

Just now, ManuManu said:

 

Bad move, he's going to get clobbered by OSU next year, not to mention MSU is on the rise as well.

This was his exit ramp.

PFT seems to think it might be Doug to the Jags

 

https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2022/02/02/who-will-the-jaguars-hire/

1 hour ago, justrelax said:

As beast said, some really good edge rushers. You think Hutchinson, Thibodeaux, Ojabo, and Johnson will all be gone?

I don't know, pass rusher is a premium position and the weak and class so t push gus down, unless teams start taking qbs anyway🤷‍♂️

 

I’m gonna still call them redskins like I have for 40 years and not think twice about doing so and cnn and the view are just going to have to deal with it 😂😂😂

Jags, Texans and Dolphins over whose going to make the first stupid HC hire

5 hours ago, bpac55 said:

I dunno about that.  Conservatives were cheering ACB and Kavanaugh but both of them from what I've read have made moves that go against Conservative values and such.

Sham or not, to have the sitting President openly tell us that he is going to make an appointment to the highest court in the nation based off of race and sex is unbelievable.  What's more unbelievable is that the media hasn't said a peep about it.  Shoe on other foot...if 45 had had openly told is he was going to appoint a white male, it would have been the main talking point for days and calls for impeachment would have rained down.

If a black woman has the best qualifications and is best for the job, I hope she gets it.  We'll never know now because of what was said.  Going with percentages again, if 100 people were qualified to be SCJ, Biden is openly throwing out 90 of them without even looking at them and picking from 10.  It's wrong. Best person for the job, any job.  

There you go again with those undefined "conservative values”.  Not sure what decisions you reference where they have gone against those undefined "conservative values.”  Perhaps you could offer the citation?

Exactly how do you define "best person” for the job of Supreme Court Justice.  This country already has a tendency to limit the job to lawyers.  Are those necessarily the best legal or Constitutional scholars alone?  Most lawyers don’t practice Constitutional law.

Is it being a Catholic conservative?  We have five and a half of those on the Court (Gorsuch raised Catholic. Now goes to an Episcopal church).  Plus Sotomayor is Catholic.That hurts diversity. Breyer and Kagen are Jewish. Heck, if we consider Gorsuch a Protestant, he is the only one on the Court.  Agnostics and Atheists make up more of the nation, yet are unrepresented on the Court. 

Should there be a need to have been a prosecutor?  One potential candidate suggested by the media has been a public defender.  That background would suggest a view perhaps uncommon on the Court.  Does diversity equate to a better bench?  One would think so.  So what exactly makes a best candidate?  And why weren’t you complaining when Kavanaugh and Barrett were nominated adding two more Catholics to the bench.  All Biden’s promise is seen as is an attempt to offer more diversity to the Court.  Broadening the view is never a bad thing.