Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

A good troll would use a little deception and play the slow game.  Not show up with his name as "PackerNation" or whatever he is.  It's childs play really.  

Yeah.  Pretty much my point.  

 

 

I'm not ashamed of how the team performed given the talent and expectations.  Howie did a crap job for the 4 seasons before that drafting, signing FA and handling players.  At least they made changes to get on a winning track.  People's expectations are probably way too high for this coming season.  The fact that we have expectations means the team isn't a dumpster fire. 

 I think the Packers' FO has squandered more opportunites to build a SB winning team with Rodgers which is worse than anything that Howie has done.  I mean we were apoplectic about drafting a QB in the 2nd round when the team had so many other needs.  GB drafted a QB in the first round when so many other players could have helped them to a Championship.  

5 minutes ago, hputenis said:

This is the most accurate description of Lamar Jackson I've ever read.  Great football player, amazing athlete, but no chance would I want him running a 2 minute offense against a playoff defense that will confuse the sheet out of him.  

 

He had a great comeback this past season against the 9th best defense for points allowed. 

 

 

Live look in at the epic bout between @RememberTheKoy and @Bacarty2

 

3 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

He's 14-13 vs teams with a .500 record or better(your numbers + his playoff numbers) at least one of those 14 wins the team didnt make, I'm sure I could fine one or two more

He's then 24-3 vs teams with losing record.

My point, is and always has been, he beats up teams with bad records and fails miserably in the playoffs.

 

It ruly dont know how much more you want. 

 

I want you to name some young QBs that you view as good/great so we can compare how they do vs bad teams and teams with winning records.  4th time now requesting this so maybe it's just an issue of literacy for you. 

2 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

He's 14-13 vs teams with a .500 record or better(your numbers + his playoff numbers) at least one of those 14 wins the team didnt make, I'm sure I could fine one or two more

He's then 24-3 vs teams with losing record.

My point, is and always has been, he beats up teams with bad records and fails miserably in the playoffs.

 

It ruly dont know how much more you want. 

Just to add a little fuel here....the Chiefs last year started off very poorly, and Baltimore beat them in Week 2. By one point.

The Chiefs:

Week 1 - W vs browns 33-29

Week 2 -  lost to Bmore by 1

Week 3 -  lost to SD by 6

Week 4 -  beat us (lol) 42-30

Week 5 - lost to the Bills 38-20

Week 6 - beat the Redskins 31-13

Week 7 - L to Titans, 27-3

Week 8 - W Giants, 20-17

Week 9 - W Packers 13-7

Week 10 - W Raiders 41-14

 

After the Raiders, they only lost 2 more games all season, to the Bengals in the 2nd last week of the regular season and the AFCCG. The Chiefs started very crappy, as teams were playing a lot of 2 high and they had to adjust, and AR was dealing with his d-bag son and his problems.

That's all

 

2 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

I am going to the Phillies game tonight. Letting everyone know my 430-5pm schedule now

Um, you know baseball games last longer than a 1/2 hour, right ????

It's spicy in here. Love it.

6 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

I dont think you know what literacy means. I've seen you're request, all 4 times and i've commented on it, alllll 4 times. 

This isnt about OTHER QB's, this is about LAMAR beating bad teams. With a 24-2, or 25-3 record vs losing teams, I think it proves my point 

 

Your point is that you seem to hold Lamar to a standard you are completely unwilling to hold any other young QB to.  Your point is that you're a completely ignorant person who can't understand the context that Lamar career record vs every team as well as record vs winning teams is pretty damn impressive for where he is at in his career. 

9 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Just to add a little fuel here....the Chiefs last year started off very poorly, and Baltimore beat them in Week 2. By one point.

The Chiefs:

Week 1 - W vs browns 33-29

Week 2 -  lost to Bmore by 1

Week 3 -  lost to SD by 6

Week 4 -  beat us (lol) 42-30

Week 5 - lost to the Bills 38-20

Week 6 - beat the Redskins 31-13

Week 7 - L to Titans, 27-3

Week 8 - W Giants, 20-17

Week 9 - W Packers 13-7

Week 10 - W Raiders 41-14

 

After the Raiders, they only lost 2 more games all season, to the Bengals in the 2nd last week of the regular season and the AFCCG. The Chiefs started very crappy, as teams were playing a lot of 2 high and they had to adjust, and AR was dealing with his d-bag son and his problems.

That's all

 

So what you're saying is the Chiefs lost only to teams with winning records as well as the Ravens when they still had Lamar in that time span.  And that's supposed to make Lamar and the Ravens beating them on the road less impressive? 

When you only compare black players to black players, and white players to white players, yes you're looking at it through race.

Why is every white WR still compared to Wes Welker?

3 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Your point is that you seem to hold Lamar to a standard you are completely unwilling to hold any other young QB to.  Your point is that you're a completely ignorant person who can't understand the context that Lamar career record vs every team as well as record vs winning teams is pretty damn impressive for where he is at in his career. 

Why do you think he does that?
 

 

1 minute ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

So what you're saying is the Chiefs lost only to teams with winning records as well as the Ravens when they still had Lamar in that time span.  And that's supposed to make Lamar and the Ravens beating them on the road less impressive? 

I’m not saying anything. Just throwing in some facts

5 minutes ago, RLC said:

When you only compare black players to black players, and white players to white players, yes you're looking at it through race.

Why is every white WR still compared to Wes Welker?

Somebody got compared to Wes Welker today?   

3 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

I bet Mahomes has more playoff wins and has a better winning percentage against teams over 500

Irrelevant.  We are talking about RB's masquerading as QB's, not actual QB's.

7 minutes ago, RLC said:

When you only compare black players to black players, and white players to white players, yes you're looking at it through race.

Why is every white WR still compared to Wes Welker?

I compare my white WRs to Kevin Curtis 

If Jalen Hurts becomes Lamar Jackson, we should be thrilled. He's not as good, so he won't though.

11 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

I bet Mahomes has more playoff wins and has a better winning percentage against teams over 500

 

No doubt about it.  As Isaid prior, I'd bet Mahomes is the only one with a better record in those areas.  Can you name any other young QBs that you think are good/great and we can look and compare? 

2 minutes ago, RLC said:

If Jalen Hurts becomes Lamar Jackson, we should be thrilled. He's not as good, so he won't though.

Jalen Hurts won't even become Kyler Murray.

"You're still going to hit a wall in the postseason" has to be one of the laziest QB takes out there.

Defenses figured them out in the post season is such a lazy QB take 

48 minutes ago, hputenis said:

Maybe he'd be less confused if you stopped DM'ing him pics of you in a bra and panties Buffalo Bill! 

Lmao!!!

Just now, Bacarty2 said:

Lamar Jackson would need to play in another 8 playoff games to Tie Mark Sanchez with 9 career playoff touchdown passes. 

Lamar would also have to reach the playoffs another 12 times in order to tie Sanchez with 4 playoff wins. 

 

2 minutes ago, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Rewording a BETA passive aggressive post from another poster is such a lazy take.  

Whoa quit stalking me 

1 minute ago, Bacarty2 said:

Let me ask you this, try to spot which game is Lamar's playoff game. 

59, 29, 38, 49, 41, 20, 37, 12,  30, 25, 23, 42, 31, . 

Let's try another year...

38, 33, 20, 27, 31, 17, 47, 3, 40, 27, 31. 

 

 

 

Are those points? Passes? Completions? Yards? Number of racists that have posted in the blog today?

2 minutes ago, Bacarty2 said:

Is my math wrong?

Sanchez has 9 in his career. Lamar had 3 in 4 games... 

Points. @schuy7 said it was a lazy take to say the game changes in the playoffs and yet, those numbers stick out like a sore thumb with Lamar. 

Add schuy to the list then

6 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Whoa quit stalking me 

You gonna have some soy milk for dinner tonight, cuck boy?