1 minute ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

McNabb converted himself.  He made a concensus decision to stop fully utilizing his physical talents and it hurt his effectiveness.  But he still had those tools and used them behind the Los and it's due to those physical tools that Lurie and the Eagles liked him enough to draft. 

Lurie and the Eagles don't want a statue standing back at QB.  Every QB they have heavily invested in shows you exactly the QB they want.  There is no run first QB in the league.  It's such a stupid term because if a QB was run first he'd have more rushing attempts than passing attempts.  Doesn't happen, at least not at this level. 

Zach Wilson and Watson are both athletic guys who can move around with their legs to escape the pocket to keep a play alive and make a run if need be.  

So you don't see a distinction between Lamar/Hurts and all the rest of those QBs? 

So we are still on Carson strong issue. This is as bad as the time we had people **** for a week about the blog for talking about non-football sports and grilling

Just now, downundermike said:

Nope, if it was posted, @Outlaw and I would have been rejoicing.

Go get him Howie.

Bowden and McKinley are two guys I would target. 

5 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Why are you obsessed with my underwear???

 

 

I'm a stoner bruh, magic underwear blow my mind

2 minutes ago, RememberTheKoy said:

 

Your numerous homophobic remarks directed at me the past several days sure paints a different picture. 

You are a racist. You are a homophobe 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

So we are still on Carson strong issue. This is as bad as the time we had people **** for a week about the blog for talking about non-football sports and grilling

I think we've slowly moved past it. Kinda. Sorta. 

Just now, Godfather said:

My day would've been better if I had multiple wives. It's boring just having one

Hey to each their own.

1 minute ago, Outlaw said:

Bowden and McKinley are two guys I would target. 

Waiver wire is going to be interesting.  Yea leaves saying some legitimately good players will be available.  Would snatch up both of those guys.

12 minutes ago, jsb235 said:

Didn't want to respond to any more trolls, but just so you know, i didn't start that thread to call anyone out. i started it because i figured i was being trolled, and didn't want to clog up the blog. 

Most of the replies in that thread are from the troll squad. Is that a coincidence? 

But, again, not responding to any more blatant trolling. 

Again, you're talking to the wrong person, as I have explained before.

0-2 count buddy. Shorten the swing and focus on things in your wheelhouse.

There's your power back!

 

1 minute ago, TorontoEagle said:

I'm a stoner bruh, magic underwear blow my mind

😄 😂.

You know what's funny is you and your merry little band of trolling circle jerkers can be cool when you're not being trolling circle jerk D bags.

Except for @4for4EaglesNest.

he's just a straight up D but hey every circle jerk needs it's pooper.

4 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

So you don't see a distinction between Lamar/Hurts and all the rest of those QBs? 

 

I see a distinction between every QB in the league.  But the Eagles and Lurie have made it clear over the decades that they have a type that they clearly value and prefer and Lamar fits that.  And they really don't care that you don't like Lamar. 

Just now, 4for4EaglesNest said:

Oh F No!!!  

 

It's hard enough trying to hide from one.  

That's true

Just now, RememberTheKoy said:

 

I see a distinction between every QB in the league.  But the Eagles and Lurie have made it clear over the decades that they have a type that they clearly value and prefer and Lamar fits that. 

Please elaborate.

Just now, RememberTheKoy said:

 

I see a distinction between every QB in the league.  But the Eagles and Lurie have made it clear over the decades that they have a type that they clearly value and prefer and Lamar fits that. 

Keep trollin' brah. Here I am trying to have an earnest discussion with you, and you just can't bring yourself to it. Instead you fall back on "there's no such thing as a run first QB" when you know exactly what that means. 

2 minutes ago, Utebird said:

😄 😂.

You know what's funny is you and your merry little band of trolling circle jerkers can be cool when you're not being trolling circle jerk D bags.

Except for @4for4EaglesNest.

he's just a straight up D but hey every circle jerk needs it's pooper.

It seems like you're upset you weren't the target. We can arrange for that if you'd like

Love to continue the banter but this Mormon magic underwear wearing polygamous non pillar needs to make breakfast for his 50 kids before I send them to their cult school where they'll most likely be molested before being given green Kool Aide for their journey in the space ship to heaven.

See ya after breakfast blog.!

Didn’t think I’d have to refer to a kids Disney movie on the blog but here we are 

 

2 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Love to continue the banter but this Mormon magic underwear wearing polygamous non pillar needs to make breakfast for his 50 kids before I send them to their cult school where they'll most likely be molested before being given green Kool Aide for their journey in the space ship to heaven.

See ya after breakfast blog.!

What's for breakfast? 

27 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

Do you think we keep Sinnett? 

I don’t know. 
PS I should expand on that. If one accepts that Strong is not ready/able to play, then yes, I think we keep another QB on the practice squad.

 

 

1 minute ago, DEagle7 said:

 

Really liked him coming out of Florida Int’l. Was a tough RB room to make with Taylor and Hines firmly entrenched. Would definitely be interested. 

Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

 

Do you take a stab at him if you are the Eagles? 

Just now, Godfather said:

Do you take a stab at him if you are the Eagles? 

No. I like our TE room with DG, Stoll, Calcaterra, and Jackson healing up.