August 15, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, Bwestbrook36 said: Holy Fn sheet!! Yeah realmuto got a hit with RISP. Average moving on up into the .160s range
August 15, 20242 yr Just now, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Yeah Alvarado is Fing cooked. I turned it back on, my bad
August 15, 20242 yr So now the question becomes since they scored 9 tonight will they score more than 2 tomorrow
August 15, 20242 yr 30 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: So now the question becomes since they scored 9 tonight will they score more than 2 tomorrow Too generous. They get blanked.
August 15, 20242 yr 9 hours ago, Joe Shades 73 said: They still suck, and Philips blows yeah someone on twitter saying about it's just one game and a reporter saying oh we needed this win. but that doesnt make us world series contenders, i mean this massive losing streak is a big deal because it pretty much gives out how bad this team really is and we have alot of holes on this roster. i mean they want to convince me they are world series contenders, get on a massive winning streak, pitch well, hit well, then we will talk. this win means nothing.
August 15, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, toughfighter83 said: yeah someone on twitter saying about it's just one game and a reporter saying oh we needed this win. but that doesnt make us world series contenders, i mean this massive losing streak is a big deal because it pretty much gives out how bad this team really is and we have alot of holes on this roster. i mean they want to convince me they are world series contenders, get on a massive winning streak, pitch well, hit well, then we will talk. this win means nothing. If they can close out the season with something like a 26-16 or better record, they MAY be able to pull me back in again. That would put them at 96 wins and probably a top 2 seed. We shall see if last night was a course correction or just a 1 game blip.
August 15, 20242 yr 21 hours ago, Alpha_TATEr said: the phillies right now .... i should post more of these considering the team always wins when i do.
August 15, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, vsptroops said: If they can close out the season with something like a 26-16 or better record, they MAY be able to pull me back in again. That would put them at 96 wins and probably a top 2 seed. We shall see if last night was a course correction or just a 1 game blip. Honestly i need them to win at least 3 of 4 from the Nats. But really after the Nats they got 3 at Atlanta, 3 at royals, 4 vs. Braves and 3 vs. Houston. That’s 13 games against playoff caliber teams and Atlanta seems to have turned the corner in sf. You have to at least go 7-6 over that stretch to get me back on they are back. Can’t go 6-13 vs. teams over .500 before the marlins series and then after the Nats go under .500 again.
August 15, 20242 yr 30 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: Honestly i need them to win at least 3 of 4 from the Nats. But really after the Nats they got 3 at Atlanta, 3 at royals, 4 vs. Braves and 3 vs. Houston. That’s 13 games against playoff caliber teams and Atlanta seems to have turned the corner in sf. You have to at least go 7-6 over that stretch to get me back on they are back. Can’t go 6-13 vs. teams over .500 before the marlins series and then after the Nats go under .500 again. My target is 11-6 given that 11 of the next 17 are at home. Anything less than 10-7 would end my persistent optimistic hopes.
August 15, 20242 yr Find it amazing the dbacks have the 6th best odds to win the NL at +900 and to win the WS +2000 on DraftKings. They might overtake the dodgers and manage to get the 1 seed. Although their schedule after the rays and marlins series is definitely harder
August 15, 20242 yr 5 minutes ago, Joe Shades 73 said: Not happening I don’t think 6 innings works. But i wouldn’t be shocked if at some point its a mandatory 3-4 innings if you start a game
August 15, 20242 yr 24 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: I don’t think 6 innings works. But i wouldn’t be shocked if at some point its a mandatory 3-4 innings if you start a game They're going to legislate the game to death. I like seeing starters going several innings, and I like a good pitching duel (which means a fast game as well), but forcing some slob to stay in for 6 innings when he's down by 6 would be a disaster. Perhaps mandatory 3 innings could work, but still, the thought of a bunch of rules to say when a pitcher can or cannot come out of a game doesn't sit well with me. We already have rules on pitchers needing to face 3 batters or end the inning (which I like), and position players only being able to be used after a 9-run deficit or something (which I don't like).
August 15, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, xzmattzx said: They're going to legislate the game to death. I like seeing starters going several innings, and I like a good pitching duel (which means a fast game as well), but forcing some slob to stay in for 6 innings when he's down by 6 would be a disaster. Perhaps mandatory 3 innings could work, but still, the thought of a bunch of rules to say when a pitcher can or cannot come out of a game doesn't sit well with me. We already have rules on pitchers needing to face 3 batters or end the inning (which I like), and position players only being able to be used after a 9-run deficit or something (which I don't like). To be honest, the rule that I absolutely hate that they implemented was the stupid runner at second in extra innings. You already cut the game shorter because of the pitch clock. I think it’s stupid and ruins an exciting game going to extras. I’d do the 3 inning rule. I hate that brewers do this, where every inning there’s a new pitcher. It also probably helps the pitching market for starters
August 15, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said: To be honest, the rule that I absolutely hate that they implemented was the stupid runner at second in extra innings. You already cut the game shorter because of the pitch clock. I think it’s stupid and ruins an exciting game going to extras. I’d do the 3 inning rule. I hate that brewers do this, where every inning there’s a new pitcher. It also probably helps the pitching market for starters I agree about the runner on second extra inning rule. IF MLB insists on having a base runner to start an inning, at least have the runner start at 1st base.
Create an account or sign in to comment