January 24, 20242 yr 18 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: But I get your point we can get rid of Bradberry Gotta just get rid of him
January 24, 20242 yr 6 hours ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: We are interviewing Kliff kingsbury for OC That’s the name I mentioned could really revamp this O.
January 24, 20242 yr 34 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Welp if there is unrest,then that affects the game play,so it's tied together some. I don't mean what functions anyone goes to or not in their off time,that is personal choice for whatever reason. We don't need to know the reasons.That's not critical to game play,but it's better if everyone is pulling the same direction. Like the Taylor Swift BS. If they are dating that's all we need to know, and I'm happy for them both. I don't need to know if Taylor French kisses or not(hey there's an article here somewhere HAHA). If Hurts is standoffish on a personal level,that to me could be an issue. Seems he works out fine with friends,but he needs to make more friends IMO Does it affect the game. Do you think Chuck Bednarik was concerned if Tommy McDonald went to the bowling event their team had? Or if their QB was loud enough in the locker room? I can see Chuck missing a tackle because of it....that's probably why Bradberry went downhill... Hurts wasn't loud enough in the locker room.
January 24, 20242 yr 9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: That’s the name I mentioned could really revamp this O. They listened to you for sure
January 24, 20242 yr 12 minutes ago, joemas6 said: They listened to you for sure If they can pull off some substantial hirings to these levels maybe everybody can buy into this new plan.
January 24, 20242 yr 32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: That’s the name I mentioned could really revamp this O. Minus the fact that Kingsbury O faltered down the stretch and got figured out in AZ which led to his firing as the HC…. But he definitely could have learned from that experience and have an O that can work in the NFL
January 24, 20242 yr 6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Minus the fact that Kingsbury O faltered down the stretch and got figured out in AZ which led to his firing as the HC…. But he definitely could have learned from that experience and have an O that can work in the NFL Indisputable point there. I'm intrigued by the Jerod Johnson interview.
January 24, 20242 yr Rosie defending NaKobe Dean and pickup and off ball LB plan. Said his bringing in Cunngham that he played pretty well for us. Whoaa…he’s nowhere close to respecting and changing that.
January 24, 20242 yr 6 minutes ago, joemas6 said: If we can get some better players that would be great. Starts with the coaches. You can’t have so many good players to overcome coaching,
January 24, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, joemas6 said: And I expect ....in the event LB philosophy changes... that they don't advertise it. What these guys say right now... means nothing to me. Just do the job. And stop worrying about Hurts going rollerskating with the team. You should watch their presser that just came out.
January 24, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said: Siri says new OC is being hired to be in charge of the O. Shouldn’t have been in charge of the O from the start no offense to Siri as soon as you gave up play calling the scheme should have been given to the OCs completely
January 24, 20242 yr Why would you handicap your OC by making them fit their philosophies into your scheme made no sense…. It’s one thing to add some of your ideas to the OCs scheme but completely different to make an OC fit in your scheme when your not calling stuff
January 24, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said: So Fangio is coming on board a year late. Early reports are that Fangio is the favorite for the position have to ask if he would then transition us to a 34 D…. Think that would be good for Davis and Carter(as an DE) Reddick as an OLB. Question fits of guys like Sweat though in the scheme…. 34 could really unlock Milton though as the opposite end to Carter is really like our front 3
January 25, 20242 yr 1 hour ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Early reports are that Fangio is the favorite for the position have to ask if he would then transition us to a 34 D…. Think that would be good for Davis and Carter(as an DE) Reddick as an OLB. Question fits of guys like Sweat though in the scheme…. 34 could really unlock Milton though as the opposite end to Carter is really like our front 3 Gannon and Desai were chosen because they run Fangio’s scheme
January 25, 20242 yr 9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Gannon and Desai were chosen because they run Fangio’s scheme Gannon runs a 43 here rans a 43 in AZ Desai ran a 43 here…. Vic Fangio has ran a 34 in all his stops ran a 34 in Miami
January 25, 20242 yr We can say the coverage scheme are the same with Fangio sure but just the slight difference upfront can be huge. if you have 5 guys at the LoS that could all possibly rush the QB makes offenses have to think. It is an advantage to a 34 v the 4 down guys on a 43. if you have the trio of Carter/Davis/Milton on the line and Sweat/Reddick on the edges… even if we opt to only rush for teams have to account for all 5 guys pre snap they won’t know which edge is coming. Little things like that can make a huge difference
January 25, 20242 yr Reddick was classified as a LB. Think it really is a hybrid thinking at this point. Really play Nickel and Dime mostly.
Create an account or sign in to comment