9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s the name I mentioned could really revamp this O.

They listened to you for sure

12 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

They listened to you for sure

If they can pull off some substantial hirings to these levels maybe everybody can buy into this new plan.

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s the name I mentioned could really revamp this O.

Minus the fact that Kingsbury O faltered down the stretch and got figured out in AZ which led to his firing as the HC…. But he definitely could have learned from that experience and have an O that can work in the NFL

6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Minus the fact that Kingsbury O faltered down the stretch and got figured out in AZ which led to his firing as the HC…. But he definitely could have learned from that experience and have an O that can work in the NFL

Indisputable point there. 

I'm intrigued by the Jerod Johnson interview. 

So Fangio is coming on board a year late.

I like Garrett Riley to take over at OC with Fangio as the DC

So now are we going to let Fangio build his D?

Siri says new OC is being hired to be in charge of the O.

Siri admits the O got stale at the end of the year.

Rosie defending NaKobe Dean and pickup and off ball LB plan. Said his bringing in Cunngham that he played pretty well for us. Whoaa…he’s nowhere close to respecting and changing that.

I do expect Dean to really show up this 2024 season.

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

If we can get some better players that would be great. 

Starts with the coaches. You can’t have so many good players to overcome coaching,

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

And I expect ....in the event LB philosophy changes... that they don't advertise it.

What these guys say right now... means nothing to me.  Just do the job.  

And stop worrying about Hurts going rollerskating with the team.

You should watch their presser that just came out. 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Siri says new OC is being hired to be in charge of the O.

Shouldn’t have been in charge of the O from the start no offense to Siri as soon as you gave up play calling the scheme should have been given to the OCs completely 

Why would you handicap your OC by making them fit their philosophies into your scheme made no sense…. It’s one thing to add some of your ideas to the OCs scheme but completely different to make an OC fit in your scheme when your not calling stuff 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So Fangio is coming on board a year late.

Early reports are that Fangio is the favorite for the position have to ask if he would then transition us to a 34 D…. Think that would be good for Davis and Carter(as an DE) Reddick as an OLB.

Question fits of guys like Sweat though in the scheme…. 34 could really unlock Milton though as the opposite end to Carter is really like our front 3 

Jim Harbaugh hired by the chargers 

1 hour ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Early reports are that Fangio is the favorite for the position have to ask if he would then transition us to a 34 D…. Think that would be good for Davis and Carter(as an DE) Reddick as an OLB.

Question fits of guys like Sweat though in the scheme…. 34 could really unlock Milton though as the opposite end to Carter is really like our front 3 

Gannon and Desai were chosen because they run Fangio’s scheme

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Gannon and Desai were chosen because they run Fangio’s scheme

Gannon runs a 43 here rans a 43 in AZ Desai ran a 43 here…. Vic Fangio has ran a 34 in all his stops ran a 34 in Miami 

We can say the coverage scheme are the same with Fangio sure but just the slight difference upfront can be huge.

if you have 5 guys at the LoS that could all possibly rush the QB makes offenses have to think. It is an advantage to a 34 v the 4 down guys on a 43.

if you have the trio of Carter/Davis/Milton on the line and Sweat/Reddick on the edges… even if we opt to only rush for teams have to account for all 5 guys pre snap they won’t know which edge is coming. Little things like that can make a huge difference 

Reddick was classified as a LB. Think it really is a hybrid thinking at this point. Really play Nickel and Dime mostly.

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Reddick was classified as a LB. Think it really is a hybrid thinking at this point. Really play Nickel and Dime mostly.

And I knew you were going to bring up well we playing sub packages correct so we decide to do a 3-3 package why well simple you still get both OLBs on the field why do that natural confusion at the LoS which 4 guys are coming?

Now for this also to work you need OLBs that can drop in coverage and not be total liabilities…. I 100% believe in Reddick not concerns with him… can sweat do it though? I have no clue maybe I can but it’s a question 

This isn’t to say we can make the switch we have pieces that can play but questions will be raised about guys in our scheme if we switch fronts… not a bad thing but just logical questions that have to be asked 

Would we even opt to try and say trade Sweat bring in Smith as the other OLB rookie from Georgia who has played OLB 

I think Fangio would be a great hire for us and he isn’t likely to go anywhere as long as Siri is the HC… dude 65 and wants to be closer to his family in PA match made in heaven for us.