Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just saying showing dollar D would put the onus on Stafford.Less pass rush but more coverage=coverage sack. Just to mix up the looks

Would hurt however if they changed to a running play,but you could bring that 6th DB up for that. Just thought mixing up the looks would be beneficial

25 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

LOL... what Reddick said... and you call anyone of us " Naive"   lol.    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ is all Reddick wanted.  

Huff.... 2024 = $4.35 mil    2025 = $7.511   2026 = $11.733 

Reddick wanted $25 million ... lol   we saved big money and are getting a 3rd round pick.  No brainer move... both financially and getting rid of the obvious cancer within the locker room.   Fangio was the last nail in that coffin for Reddick.   He wanted no parts of that ego either.   Amazing how " Nolan" has developed with snaps and the defense is #1.  

Football is a team sport, might want to reach out to Hassan and remind him.  

What player has a season where they are arguably DPOY…and wouldn’t feel underpaid? Of course he felt he deserved to get paid after such a performance. That’s every guy out there pretty much. Over 90 percent anyway. Let’s just go down the list of pass rushers and you tell me the top one that didn’t want to get paid big money. He sucked it up playing hard under contract that second season here. All knowing Rosie wasn’t paying him. Thought he showed team spirit.

 The Huff part was just a bad move. No sugar coat version. The fact it was all way in the works by Rosie so far ahead….just shows the intention of how it really was all Rosie. Don’t pay Reddick our best D player. Fine. Can make cases for that individual move. But had little to do with Fangio. Fangio was there when Rosie already was making the move. Reddick and Huff weren’t Fangio moves. Jalyx was. Long live Jalyx!

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Would hurt however if they changed to a running play,but you could bring that 6th DB up for that. Just thought mixing up the looks would be beneficial

It's a way to cover Burks if he isn't cutting it. Since we have him for the duration,we need to do a few different things

What amount of money was a great move by Rosie for one healthy playoff snap again No Mas?

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We should if they go after Burks

Need to use Trot is my opinion 

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We should if they go after Burks

I feel real confident in stating….there is no IF

28 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Demoted to RB 3 in NC

He will be cut after 2 years, just like I said.  Just soft and doesn't bring anything other than being an early down runner in a committee.  The easy role of the 3

27 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Not how to utilize Free Agency in my mind. You pay guys for actual production. Top Rosie handpicked FA so he could cover up his agenda going down to show dominating power over Reddick was terrible business. Reeks of all Rosie and not Fangio move the whole way at that. Rosie had lined up not paying Reddick long ago. Which is actually fine. The trade off to Huff was a bad mistake.

 Playoff game: 1 single snap. That’s a failure and a bust of ever I’ve seen it. Pretty easy call on that decision. Anyway…Huff just needs to come through with making one dang play for us here to help achieve our goal. At least do that much.

Yeah, can't have that $4 mil guy not perform year 1

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

4,2,5 is Nickle

Yeah was trying to sort it all out…out loud here. 4 -1-6 is Dime 

so 3-2-6 is Dollar?

28 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Not how to utilize Free Agency in my mind. You pay guys for actual production. Top Rosie handpicked FA so he could cover up his agenda going down to show dominating power over Reddick was terrible business. Reeks of all Rosie and not Fangio move the whole way at that. Rosie had lined up not paying Reddick long ago. Which is actually fine. The trade off to Huff was a bad mistake.

 Playoff game: 1 single snap. That’s a failure and a bust of ever I’ve seen it. Pretty easy call on that decision. Anyway…Huff just needs to come through with making one dang play for us here to help achieve our goal. At least do that much.

Does the entire league have the same agenda over Reddick.... or is it not obvious Reddick has the issue?   Why so difficult to see?    

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just saying showing dollar D would put the onus on Stafford.Less pass rush but more coverage=coverage sack. Just to mix up the looks

Can I say I’ve loved the way Fangio has mixed up coverages. Been a fantastic part of our success.

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Would hurt however if they changed to a running play,but you could bring that 6th DB up for that. Just thought mixing up the looks would be beneficial

Think our issue is LB. More looking at Dime scenarios….where we can just have Baun out as the only LB

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's a way to cover Burks if he isn't cutting it. Since we have him for the duration,we need to do a few different things

Like get him off the field. Better solution IMO. But I do like the thought you’ve put in here. Had my wheels spinning considering it.

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

He will be cut after 2 years, just like I said.  Just soft and doesn't bring anything other than being an early down runner in a committee.  The easy role of the 3

No idea why you guys brought up or are talking about Miles Sanders. Pretty random

33 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Found it interesting and telling about the state of our team. Why'd you bring up Reddick in response to our snap counts? That’s a better question.

It's interesting?   Or just how it unfolded last week?   

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yeah, can't have that $4 mil guy not perform year 1

2 year 34 mil contract is what I saw

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

2 year 34 mil contract is what I saw

How is it not? 

Just now, joemas6 said:

It's interesting?   Or just how it unfolded last week?   

Answer D…my favorite…all the above

30 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Huff was Up …not so much up and coming. At his peak…we paid for that. When I looked at his entire situation? Seemed real obvious this all was pretty much his situation. But you are right with can’t win them all. 

Good thing it wasn't big money and still has more time to contribute

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Does the entire league have the same agenda over Reddick.... or is it not obvious Reddick has the issue?   Why so difficult to see?    

Not sure…why is it so difficult for you to see? Why don’t we circle back to this after he signs as a FA. He lost tons of money. Had a bad agent. Think you are using his bad agent as a reflection on him as a person. He wanted very badly to be an Eagles.

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah was trying to sort it all out…out loud here. 4 -1-6 is Dime 

so 3-2-6 is Dollar?

Yeah

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Good thing it wasn't big money and still has more time to contribute

17 mil is pretty big money. You’re still going on and on over Sanders getting 7

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Good thing it wasn't big money and still has more time to contribute

17 mil is pretty big money. You’re still going on and on over Sanders getting 7

26 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

If he can produce in New Orleans it will soften the blow of paying him considerably.

Yeah, that $4.35 mil for Huff.... Meanwhile Miles Sanders $7.695

Such a huge investment on Huff

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Good thing it wasn't big money and still has more time to contribute

17 mil is pretty big money. You’re still going on and on over Sanders getting 7