Next year AZ "could be a problem" I called it!!!!!

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Page number pls since you are the one making the claim I'm not wasting my time on false claims,if you said it show the proof

Ham said... and I will give him credit... before I  correct him on his spin...

" Jayden Daniels is a problem "  from before the season. 

He didn't say like he is trying to spin...that Washington was a problem.

He kept arguing how good Dallas is and how they were better than us and he would be happy with 10 wins and maybe make the playoffs.  

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Obviously anybody steeping in for Maddox was an upgrade. Not to belittle DeJean here…but everybody always targeted Maddox.

Big decisions made week 6(the game you always reference) That when Hurts hero ball was pulled and DeJean got playing time. Those decisions turned this team around. So tomorrow let's play good solid ball with no BS bonehead calls or plays and then we can do the same vs the Wuss and go to the SB

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Page number pls since you are the one making the claim I'm not wasting my time on false claims,if you said it show the proof

Don’t really care if you believe me or not. I said it. It happened. You don’t remember any of it? Not my endless talk of Jayden Daniels in the draft? Not Kliff as my choice for OC? Not that I stated plainly Washington was a problem? I’d bet No Mas remembers if he cared to back up the truth here.

I still said we’d win the East and all

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

You can hit the page button.  But you are great spinning an ability that a 6 year old can do ...click the page number... and make that a troll.

So then if you miss a conversation you don't go back... or you hit " previous " 20 times in a row?  I think you just skip the conversation because I know you miss when the rest of us make posts.

What?

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Ham said... and I will give him credit... before I  correct him on his spin...

" Jayden Daniels is a problem "  from before the season. 

He didn't say like he is trying to spin...that Washington was a problem.

He kept arguing how good Dallas is and how they were better than us and he would be happy with 10 wins and maybe make the playoffs.  

Well I believe I said I liked JD and that he needed more weapons and an O line and a decent RB and TE and they seemed to have collected all those guys for him,but really they were terrible last year and there was zero way to know they would be this good this fast

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO ANY team can be a "problem"  In fact all 31 can be a pre season problem LOL

Which means nothing. Not true either. Definitely not the way I think…which nobody here could deny.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Don’t really care if you believe me or not. I said it. It happened. You don’t remember any of it? Not my endless talk of Jayden Daniels in the draft? Not Kliff as my choice for OC? Not that I stated plainly Washington was a problem? I’d bet No Mas remembers if he cared to back up the truth here.

Any team can be a problem LOL. A "problem" doesn't tell me much. How about those 9ers??? The dream team

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Which means nothing. Not true either. Definitely not the way I think…which nobody here could deny.

They had what 4 wins last year?

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I still said we’d win the East and all

Along with everyone else lol

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Next year AZ "could be a problem" I called it!!!!!

Maybe wait for the draft…FAs…but there is quite a bit to get behind with this thought actually. Kyler Murray actually probably focused and ready to work this offseason. Gannon maybe gets his D together. If those are your guys…we’llcome back to that discussion .

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Any team can be a problem LOL. A "problem" doesn't tell me much. How about those 9ers??? The dream team

Can’t stay near the top forever

OK I'm out Fly Eagles Fly

8 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Ham said... and I will give him credit... before I  correct him on his spin...

" Jayden Daniels is a problem "  from before the season. 

He didn't say like he is trying to spin...that Washington was a problem.

He kept arguing how good Dallas is and how they were better than us and he would be happy with 10 wins and maybe make the playoffs.  

I said Dallas was better last season and came backwards. Washington was my team to give us problems. I’ve been real high on the things I’ve stayed with them. They dumped the garbage of Snyder. They’re moving up just from that obviously. Kliff was my OC choice. Quinn is a quality D mind. 
 Then yeah…Jayden Daniels…that kid is freaking good. I don’t think he will have career longevity. But man I’ve been totally understanding how incredible a talent he is.

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

They had what 4 wins last year?

Makes it a very bold statement I made indeed

Like I said though I never said anything like Washington was Super Bowl bound or anything

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Like I said though I never said anything like Washington was Super Bowl bound or anything

Didn’t say they’d get 12 regular season wins either

Yeah thought the Niners would be better than 6 wins.

30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Big decisions made week 6(the game you always reference) That when Hurts hero ball was pulled and DeJean got playing time. Those decisions turned this team around. So tomorrow let's play good solid ball with no BS bonehead calls or plays and then we can do the same vs the Wuss and go to the SB

See I agree... I'll also add another similarity between week 6 and this past week vs Green Bay.... and why I have been trying to be positive and not complain. 

AJ was out 3 games prior to week 6...Smith was knocked out with a concussion week 3.

First game back where Hurts and those WRs played together.... just like this Green Bay game.

You point out all the bad play by the offense this past week.. Ham is obsessed complaining about week 6.

You both fail to realize that those 3 didn't play together for 3 weeks.

So neither game looked great...but u will guess those games were our lowest scoring games since the bye?

Logic says we should now trend upwards as those guys practice and play together. 

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

See I agree... I'll also add another similarity between week 6 and this past week vs Green Bay.... and why I have been trying to be positive and not complain. 

AJ was out 3 games prior to week 6...Smith was knocked out with a concussion week 3.

First game back where Hurts and those WRs played together.... just like this Green Bay game.

You point out all the bad play by the offense this past week.. Ham is obsessed complaining about week 6.

You both fail to realize that those 3 didn't play together for 3 weeks.

So neither game looked great...but u will guess those games were our lowest scoring games since the bye?

Logic says we should now trend upwards as those guys practice and play together. 

Is AJ healthy? Can he run?

44 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

To be fair it’s not like I’m master of writing skills either though

You aren't too bad..  just when you speak in the abstract. .the theories... you gotta use an example...make it concrete.   Then it can lead to a legit conversation.   Less confrontational.

Less " Brizer " like 

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

You aren't too bad..  just when you speak in the abstract. .the theories... you gotta use an example...make it concrete.   Then it can lead to a legit conversation.   Less confrontational.

Less " Brizer " like 

I appreciate that. But not how I see it. Maybe takes me paragraphs and several posts…but I’ve been extremely specific and detailed on most topics. I could be more concise and direct to communicate my points. I don’t see myself as Brizer.

Some things need to be more abstract and theory. That’s the point I’m making. It’s exactly using any example specific details that always you hang on so hard. You miss the ideas and concepts over the use of a theoretical example. All you hear is the example name…..not the thoughts behind it that actually are what’s important.

40 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What?

If you miss a conversation or go on vacation... you get 20 pages behind...do you ever go back to see what the conversation was?   

I have so I know what you all are talking about,right now we are on page 1310... if I had to get back to 1280.. I'm not going to do it one at a time???   Isn't it obvious the page #s are there so we can go back?   

Really I don't think I'm the only one on here that could figure that out?  I'm the last one to even do an avatar??   That's basic common sense when you see page #s on a site, so you can go to a page.