Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok…so we disagree completely. Because I absorbed everything about how he had to create the new O using Siri terminology all summer all the time he spent with Patullo doing this.

But even taking this disagreement out…still was a completely different new O for our O to install and learn to say the least.

I’m going way further than you here. I’m seeing the bye week as that first chance to tweak and correct things after first tests of four fakes ever under live action.

I’m saying the O scheme in itself needed to be worked on/adjusted and improved to work. That was needed before any players could even attempt installing ..much less perfecting anything.

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Your timeline comprehension is abysmal LMAO. How long is a "grace period" in the NFL? 4 weeks? 14 weeks?

With no PS? First TC? Certainly not being defined so much week one is for sure

20 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

But AR passes to loosen up the run…instead of Run to open the pass. Can’t deny it’s worked for him.

It has worked because other DCs are not Fangio.

Taking Kelce out of the Chiefs’ game plan by rearranging the seams between the DB and LB zones was something Andy wasn’t prepared for. One extra DB zone makes a huge difference.

That difference was evident in all the Regular Season games after the Bye. The quick release routes over the middle were denied to every QB the Eagles faced. Andy had no answer for that. It wasn’t that Mahomes was shaky. Mahomes simply didn’t have options to go to.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

What better version can there be when you hoist the Lombardi????? What comes after that????

Exactly why you aren’t capable of even considering any other path or scenario. Just because it worked…doesn’t mean it absolutely was the only way…or even the best way. But can’t be denied..it worked!

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Your timeline comprehension is abysmal LMAO. How long is a "grace period" in the NFL? 4 weeks? 14 weeks?

Not defining our entire 2024 O based on week four at all

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No team has mastered a new O all in one TC. Sorry but I just feel that’s such obvious simple plain FACT. Expectations of perfection first action(no PS)is ludicrous…insane frankly even.

Every team has the same process and problems? Or just unique to the Eagles?

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Your timeline comprehension is abysmal LMAO. How long is a "grace period" in the NFL? 4 weeks? 14 weeks?

So yeah…would say two..50 percent you are basing your defining conclusion on were least relevant to do so based off of.

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Snaps and remaining on the field are due to converting first downs. Not because a run instead of pass. You got that twisted here.

Not twisted at all. You misread the point, which was that the Eagles O-Line was fresher and less beaten up after 40 1st half snaps than the Chiefs O-Line was after only 20 1st half snaps.

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It did and we won anyway. Sounds like Siri was versatile to me. Bark still had 97 yards of offense even with the TOP SB defender KEYING ON HIM

On over 30 touches. …less impressive. 2.2 yards a carry is terrible

25 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Still just waiting for you to explain this four game defining situation. Explain defining our 2024 O based so massively on that Bucs game first please.

I can’t. And I wouldn’t even try to. No one game defines something any more than any other one game. They are both one game. One equals one. That is basic mathematics.

10 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Mahomes did not start the game shaky. However, Andy’s play calling put Mahomes consistently into high risk situations and the Eagles Defense made him pay and pay and pay. Eventually he became shell shocked. But Andy kept on going to the same well even though that well was clearly dry.

Totally shaky. It was weird. Unforced errors and indecisive. Don’t want to take anything away from our victory…but Mahomes was real shaky and off. Just undeniably so. Legacy destroying levels.

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

First overall pick Goff is flawed. Two SB..one championship. Sounds familiar , no? How many championships Goff lead Lions being considered favorites for several season now?

They are always there, the fact they can't get over the hump is their issue/ Why do I care about the Lions, or Kupp, or the 9ers? GO troll the other fan boards, I'm sure they would appreciate sifting through 150 posts in a row to find some point being made

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

I can’t. And I wouldn’t even try to. No one game defines something any more than any other one game. They are both one game. One equals one. That is basic mathematics.

One with so many missing and injured isn’t defining of what the starters could do

22 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Last two SBs…they’d have won can’t even be questioned. I’d say that’s more than enough examples for me to provide. This happened in the first attempt ever to Three Peat as champions. Feels like plenty to support AR greatness.

I never said Andy isn’t great. I said he is high risk. Get the wax out of your ears.

Specifically against those Bucs who are such a unique matchup problem for us always on top of things. Then playing in extreme 98 degree heat.

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yeah I do. But it’s such a long answer to provide over something everybody else just easily knows. This is a you problem.

No it's yours as you talk to your self with post after post after pointless post

23 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

What was the Chiefs record last season?

What was the Chiefs record in SB LIX?

What does NFL stand for?

3 minutes ago, mattwill said:

I can’t. And I wouldn’t even try to. No one game defines something any more than any other one game. They are both one game. One equals one. That is basic mathematics.

One equal game plus one equal game firming 50 percent of you define our entire 2024 O season. First game in Brazil and Bucs game so shorthanded. The two least relevant defining games of our entire season IMO…so differing.

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Wasn’t it the best record in football with like only two losses all season?

Their record in the game that mattered was 0-1.

I even suggested we just sit out guys and accept the loss in Tampa week 4. We weren’t winning that game. AJ and Smiuty out. Lane out. Somebody else..like it matters. Missing two tops WRs and best OLine is the game you define our passing O from?

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Who cares?????

Guess anybody trying to say AR so terrible

24 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Reigning two straight years world champs winning the most games all season going back to Three Peat. Yeah…don’t think cases get any easier for me to make supporting AR methods working than that.

Did they work in SB LIX?

If the 2024 Eagles and Chiefs played a 10-game series from February 1 to the middle of May, how many of the 10 would the Eagles win, and how many would the Chiefs win?

3 minutes ago, mattwill said:

What was the Chiefs record in SB LIX?

What does NFL stand for?

Just need about any other approach than coming after how poor AR is as the reasoning. Like almost anything else would be an Improvement.

25 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

It’s false because you said it was mine. You can form whatever ideas. But when you assume falsely about mine…then it’s a clear false conclusion. Without debate.

Here is what I said. Explain where I stated any conclusion that I believed was your conclusion.

"Not lashing out at you at all. Just having a conversation. Your insecurities are seeing lashing where there is none.”