April 18, 20242 yr In a startling report out of ESPN, Philadelphia's ownership and front office spoke to former New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick shortly after the Super Bowl champion parted ways with the team he won six titles with. While the Eagles contemplated what bringing Belichick into the fold could bring, the organization ultimately decided against it due to their trust in current head coach Nick Sirianni, and the belief their organizational structure would have to change should Belichick be hired.
April 18, 20242 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: So we got Jordan Davis instead of Pickett No... we got Davis, Brown, Carter and pick 50 instead of Pickett.
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: So we got Jordan Davis instead of Pickett We got both of them
April 18, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: In a startling report out of ESPN, Philadelphia's ownership and front office spoke to former New England Patriots head coach Bill Belichick shortly after the Super Bowl champion parted ways with the team he won six titles with. While the Eagles contemplated what bringing Belichick into the fold could bring, the organization ultimately decided against it due to their trust in current head coach Nick Sirianni, and the belief their organizational structure would have to change should Belichick be hired. Yes....as I said... Howie constantly works the communication. You take it as...Howie / Lurie want Belicheck. No shot he comes here.
April 18, 20242 yr Author https://athlonsports.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/eagles-today/news/philadelphia-eagles-nick-sirianni-bill-belichick-hire-howie-roseman
April 18, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: We got both of them If we took Pickett, Davis would be elsewhere
April 18, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: So we got Jordan Davis instead of Pickett Not really thinking Davis looking like a real big positive from Rosie. Trading up so high for him hasn’t been looking very wise. Surely not if you expect high picks to not be very developmental. Hopefully Davis can play half of each game and still have any effective play on the second half of the season…dare to think about postseason even.
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: No... we got Davis, Brown, Carter and pick 50 instead of Pickett. Why stack #1 picks?? Idk maybe we get offered next year's #1 pick from a team in the mid 30s...should we turn it down because we don't need a QB? Makes no sense. Team offers you a trade that benefits you...you take it.
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Yes....as I said... Howie constantly works the communication. You take it as...Howie / Lurie want Belicheck. No shot he comes here. I take it as we needed to hire good coaches.
April 18, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Not really thinking Davis looking like a real big positive from Rosie. Trading up so high for him hasn’t been looking very wise. Surely not if you expect high picks to not be very developmental. Hopefully Davis can play half of each game and still have any effective play on the second half of the season…dare to think about postseason even. How much was " so high"?
April 18, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Not really thinking Davis looking like a real big positive from Rosie. Trading up so high for him hasn’t been looking very wise. Surely not if you expect high picks to not be very developmental. Hopefully Davis can play half of each game and still have any effective play on the second half of the season…dare to think about postseason even. But we need to trade up to 9 next week
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Why stack #1 picks?? Idk maybe we get offered next year's #1 pick from a team in the mid 30s...should we turn it down because we don't need a QB? Makes no sense. Team offers you a trade that benefits you...you take it. You can even were mentioning utilizing the picks to move on from our no starting level running QB. I’d go back and quote you saying all this but unfortunately all those posts are lost now.
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: How much was " so high"? 13th pick of the first round. That high. Real real high. Especially for a guy we are looking to try and develop still in 2024.
April 18, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: You can even were mentioning utilizing the picks to move on from our no starting level running QB. I’d go back and quote you saying all this but unfortunately all those posts are lost now. Yes..please go back. I absolutely said it's two great trades regardless of the QB. Please please go back.
April 18, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: 13th pick of the first round. That high. Real real high. Especially for a guy we are looking to try and develop still in 2024. Which pick did we have originally to trade up so high?
April 18, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: But we need to trade up to 9 next week Not for a Jordan Davis.
April 18, 20242 yr But Davis was a positional need. Hard to run our D without a Nose. So I do cut a bit of slack over that.
April 18, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: You can even were mentioning utilizing the picks to move on from our no starting level running QB. I’d go back and quote you saying all this but unfortunately all those posts are lost now. See..the problem is...you try to read everyone's thoughts...you don't pay attention to what other people say...what's that word I use again..starts with an N.
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Not for a Jordan Davis. You don't think he was top 5 on the Eagles board? The way they value linemen?
April 18, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: But we need to trade up to 9 next week Never said need. I did admit to I’d pull the trigger in that rumored trade proposal with the ninth pick that’s supposedly on the trade block. I’ve been on record as believing pretty strong in this draft class. Should be a quality player(based historically at the 22spot No Mas) if we stay at our spot.
April 18, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Yes..please go back. I absolutely said it's two great trades regardless of the QB. Please please go back. You said we need the picks to move on from Hurts to get a QB. Endless preaching from you about Hurts not being of starter level and only a running QB. Hasn’t changed that much from you even today really.
April 18, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: You said we need the picks to move on from Hurts to get a QB. Endless preaching from you about Hurts not being of starter level and only a running QB. Hasn’t changed that much from you even today really. But believe it or not…you were even more against Hurts at that point.
April 18, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Never said need. I did admit to I’d pull the trigger in that rumored trade proposal with the ninth pick that’s supposedly on the trade block. I’ve been on record as believing pretty strong in this draft class. Should be a quality player(based historically at the 22spot No Mas) if we stay at our spot. Right it's a strong draft class,why would you give up draft assets in a strong draft class?? I only do it if I'm big time fleecing someone,otherwise I want the picks in a deep talented class at every position(except RB)
April 18, 20242 yr 5 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Which pick did we have originally to trade up so high? Is the 13th overall pick not considered a high draft choice to you now?
Create an account or sign in to comment