April 18, 20242 yr Would Payton Manning have even been Payton Manning not playing so many games inside? How many struggles did he have in the cold NE?
April 18, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I'm sure playing in Georgia he had to play cold weather games away in that league Not so much actually
April 18, 20242 yr 9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Just saying at 9 they should get better offers from other teams than the BR(theoretical) one from us,they can hold that pick hostage a long time I think they probably get a better offer as well
April 18, 20242 yr Shady had a good conversation talking about Kelce. Said he questioned his new C. "Coach what are we doing? This guys do small. You think he can block and holdup?” Coach told him he’s young give him time. As TC continued on Shady came around telling coach how he’s a beast.
April 18, 20242 yr 30 minutes ago, joemas6 said: That's great... doesn't match up with the Eagles Grabbing a stud CB like Mitchell to Match Up with Lamb would work very nicely.
April 18, 20242 yr How great would we fare if we had a CB that could limit Lamb and these other larger WR we face in the NFC? Be game changing.
April 18, 20242 yr I was thinking DeJean could fit under Fangio being an off outside CB. Simms disagrees and balks at him even working in a Seattle style CB D.
April 18, 20242 yr If being questioned so hard doing that outside…he isn’t a great option in the slot much of the time then. The most important position to have fluid hips.
April 19, 20242 yr Had CB Terrion Arnold in for a visit. I’ve been talking about trading up for him. He was on a morning show and mentioned how Brian Dawkins was built and meant to play football …along with Kobe, Jordan and LeBron to play BBall…that he’s just born to be a football player.
April 19, 20242 yr The NFL has reinstated 5 players who were suspended indefinitely last year for violating the league’s gambling policy. Isaiah Rodgers was not one of them
April 19, 20242 yr 11 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said: The NFL has reinstated 5 players who were suspended indefinitely last year for violating the league’s gambling policy. Isaiah Rodgers was not one of them Uh oh…
April 19, 20242 yr 5 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Wouldn’t be bad for them. To nitpick: are you so sure a Cal kid that played at Georgia can thrive in cold windy Chicago? I listed Bowers as my top tier elite prospect. But cold weather and wind is a factor. Several players don’t adapt well. Just look at Tua. I don’t think Tua has won a game with the weather under 50 degrees. Tua is a good QB. Lit it up last year. But…don’t see him translating as well here of in Chi- Town…or anywhere cold. Fell off to end the season for sure. Just not a cold weather QB. Will the cold wind hurt Bowers game? Not sure we have enough of any proof to show it wouldn’t. Probably stretching things here a bit I admit. But is something to consider and question. More than just athletic traits come into play. Many here seem to not understand these other factors. I think with the QB it's more of a concern....TEs seem to thrive in cold weather. Different game.
April 19, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Just saying at 9 they should get better offers from other teams than the BR(theoretical) one from us,they can hold that pick hostage a long time Sure... you know they will get some offers being that they pick 1st.. don’t have many picks....teams will assume they would be willing to trade back.
April 19, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Desperate doesn’t apply to grabbing a top five talent on anybodies draft board. BPA should trump positional or player specifics being a top 5 overall player for any team. But specifics do come into play if a QB is being traded up for at 9. Think they could get even more than the suggested trade if a QB still is on the board at 9. Then all you list of specifics and position are huge factors. Bears will cash in big time. What's the obsession with #5? Don't you think they have different tiers on their board...why do we assume first tier is exactly 5 guys ? You have 8... say there are 4 QBs drafted....that puts it down to pick 12...say a few other players go first...now you can get that tier at pick 14 or 15... what's your trade chart say now? And not even the trade chart...you might find a team just looking to trade down anyway, might not cost as much. To give up the picks NOW??? Simply for the number 5??? Bad business.
April 19, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Would Payton Manning have even been Payton Manning not playing so many games inside? How many struggles did he have in the cold NE? Probably more so there due to the New England defense.
April 19, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Grabbing a stud CB like Mitchell to Match Up with Lamb would work very nicely. There you go.... why didn't you just say...take the CB. Why do you have to argue? You wait to see if the CB is there at 9...then make the move. You don't give all that up for OL or WR...or even the TE.
April 19, 20242 yr 4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: How great would we fare if we had a CB that could limit Lamb and these other larger WR we face in the NFC? Be game changing. Yes... you follow me now... the guy is there at 8....you have Chicago on the phone....he doesn't get picked...bam you make the deal. That's how you do business as a winner. You get your specific guy.
April 19, 20242 yr 3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: I was thinking DeJean could fit under Fangio being an off outside CB. Simms disagrees and balks at him even working in a Seattle style CB D. On the radio tonight the local draft expert... I forget dude's name... was saying he sees him as probably the best safety in the class. Same issue with stiffness on the outside island...but says he knows how to manipulate the QB'S eyes and make mistakes. Would instantly be the guy to call the defense in the back.
April 19, 20242 yr 54 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Probably more so there due to the New England defense. I won’t dispute it being a factor. But also doesn’t change my opinion on how much Manning relied on perfect conditions so heavily. Just really no comparisons throwing in a bubble versus dealing with the elements.
April 19, 20242 yr 54 minutes ago, joemas6 said: There you go.... why didn't you just say...take the CB. Why do you have to argue? You wait to see if the CB is there at 9...then make the move. You don't give all that up for OL or WR...or even the TE. I said what I meant originally. I can make case for any of the guys willing to trade up for. But the top CBs every draft teams trade up to grab. Really hard to get a hold of. I’m not seeing that trade scenario as giving up anything crazy. That’s the amount we can afford to give up in my view. But like your other post suggests…of course I’d rather grab one of those same players at 15 than 9. Clearly cheaper. But you gotta have a trade partner….to go along with that player sliding down.
April 19, 20242 yr 56 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Yes... you follow me now... the guy is there at 8....you have Chicago on the phone....he doesn't get picked...bam you make the deal. That's how you do business as a winner. You get your specific guy. You’re disregarding BPA altogether. That’s a different viewpoint from me. I’d love any guy top five on my board. That price I don’t see as steep at all for any of those I listed.
Create an account or sign in to comment