April 30, 20241 yr 15 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said: Sure. Not written in stone yet as we now have several who are going to vie for C and RG. Jurgens was Kelces' choice when we got him, still is, so I'll trust him - at least for now. I mean we drafted a C from NC State in the 6th round thats undersized and good athlete for his position. Kelce 2.0??? All jokes aside now just thought it was a funny coincidence lol
April 30, 20241 yr 23 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said: Not going to hear that from me, I was for him from the beginning. Is Jurgens going to be an adjustment? Sure. Not written in stone yet as we now have several who are going to vie for C and RG. Jurgens was Kelces' choice when we got him, still is, so I'll trust him - at least for now. We'll see what happens in camp. OTC still has us at 29 mill cap space. By the way, axing Bradberry June 1st only saves us like 4 mill, still on the hook for 11 next yr I’m seeing it as a break even on this year’s cap exactly…but he’s on the books for tons in the future …so we get out from under all of that.
April 30, 20241 yr 8 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: I mean we drafted a C from NC State in the 6th round thats undersized and good athlete for his position. Kelce 2.0??? All jokes aside now just thought it was a funny coincidence lol I like McMahaon to tell you the truth. Jurgens already locked into the C job we know. Kind of like last season how he locked into the RG job. They can talk about competition and such…but Jurgens has to screw up pretty significant for them to make a changed I’d think.
April 30, 20241 yr Jurgens should be ok. He proved himself as a capable NFL player at RG. More natural C for sure in my view.
April 30, 20241 yr He learned alongside the best. Kelce still talks him up and I don't think Kelce as a bs'er
April 30, 20241 yr We were at 16 mil dead cap…but that’s climbed to 38 already. More coming pretty obviously.
April 30, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, mjkline1958 said: He learned alongside the best. Kelce still talks him up and I don't think Kelce as a bs'er Kelce is a loyal dude. Pretty much will back anybody and everybody been by his side. But Jurgens showed decent at G. So no reason to believe he’ll have a huge decline moving to his more natural position of C.
May 1, 20241 yr HR on taking Trotter Jr not as a legacy: "You have to stick to your board,” Roseman said. "We can't make up a grade on any player just because we like them... You know, the best person I know in the world is my wife, and I don't want her playing linebacker for us either.”
May 1, 20241 yr Author 11 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Are you actually saying here that Kelce was living off name recognition in his career? Completely false! Kelce was a player that lived up to the billing even his last season he played. Kelce didn’t have to retire because his level of play dropped off so hard. Kelce was playing at a high level even last season. Guy was a complete stud player…all the way. He earned that name recognition pretty much every single game of his career. Let me ask you and I want a LIST. Define what makes a pro bowl center as opposed to just a regular one. Just that one position.Anxious for your response because there are other centers that are also pro bowlers. What is your criteria?
May 1, 20241 yr Author 2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Jurgens should be ok. He proved himself as a capable NFL player at RG. More natural C for sure in my view. So now the drop off isn't all that significant like you were panicking on earlier? Another case of taking both sides so you can "call it" . It gets really old
May 1, 20241 yr Author 2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said: Kelce is a loyal dude. Pretty much will back anybody and everybody been by his side. But Jurgens showed decent at G. So no reason to believe he’ll have a huge decline moving to his more natural position of C. Oh now the story is changing in typical Ham fashion HAHAHAHA. First there was going to be a near insurmountable drop off. Now it's "he was a decent G so he should be a good C" .I enjoy the flip flops,reminds me of living in FL,but you have more of them than they do
May 1, 20241 yr Completely consistent. Of course there will be a drop off from the best we’ve ever had at C to Jurgens. Duh! Just basic and obvious stuff I keep explaining to you …seemingly endlessly.
May 1, 20241 yr Like I said that’s not speaking poorly of Jurgens. Just because he’s not looking like the best C of all times for us doesn’t mean I’m stating he sucks. Huge divide in between all that.
May 1, 20241 yr I’m not going into page ten defending Jason Kelce to you. Dude was a stud…his whole career!
May 1, 20241 yr Anybody else think there won’t be a dropoff calling the assignments and the execution at C going from the greatest we’ve ever known to Jurgens? Or can we move forward past the glaringly most obvious?
May 1, 20241 yr 1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Let me ask you and I want a LIST. Define what makes a pro bowl center as opposed to just a regular one. Just that one position.Anxious for your response because there are other centers that are also pro bowlers. What is your criteria? Jason Kelce is what made a stud C every single season of his career!
May 1, 20241 yr Author Still waiting for the list of what qualifies as a pro bowl center. Since you are "educated" and "aware" this should be a breeze
May 1, 20241 yr Author 37 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Completely consistent. Of course there will be a drop off from the best we’ve ever had at C to Jurgens. Duh! Just basic and obvious stuff I keep explaining to you …seemingly endlessly. Did Kelce make the pro bowl his first year?
May 1, 20241 yr Author 33 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: I’m not going into page ten defending Jason Kelce to you. Dude was a stud…his whole career! What qualifies him as a stud as compared to just a regular C. This should be more than easy for you
May 1, 20241 yr Author 30 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Anybody else think there won’t be a dropoff calling the assignments and the execution at C going from the greatest we’ve ever known to Jurgens? Or can we move forward past the glaringly most obvious? Inexperienced vs experienced vs pro bowl vs stud Give me the criteria just for the C position
May 1, 20241 yr Author 35 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Worthless Power Rankings have us at 11. Behind Green Bay Packers and LARams. It's that drop off at C
Create an account or sign in to comment