July 9, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Read the whole thing not just the first line. Ridiculous The fall off from 2022 is what he's talking about if you can READ and COMPREHEND
July 9, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: So he;s getting worse with time? He suffered in no scheme last season. Plus he clearly suffered injuries last season. Teams caught up with our stale and predictable O. This stuff matters for any player…no matter how much you try to ignore this obvious situation that transpired.
July 9, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Simmons is think would be only taking a starter position to sign. Adams would be more flexible to fit in and have to prove himself. Which I think he totally would and could do for us. Both are too expensive so let's drop this now
July 9, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Read the whole thing not just the first line. Ridiculous Yeah I thought the rest was ridiculous too
July 9, 20242 yr 7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Jamal Adams very clearly would be much more flexible to fit in. Plus I’d believe he’d view this S room as one he could thrive in becoming the best of the bunch. You don't think he would prefer to go a place where he would start?
July 9, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: He suffered in no scheme last season. Plus he clearly suffered injuries last season. Teams caught up with our stale and predictable O. This stuff matters for any player…no matter how much you try to ignore this obvious situation that transpired. I don't care he DIGRESSED and now we want to see him PROgress
July 9, 20242 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Both are too expensive so let's drop this now The Eagles have plenty of money....not about expensive.
July 9, 20242 yr Author 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Yeah I thought the rest was ridiculous too No what's ridiculous is you clinging to the first line and ignoring what the point of the article was LMAO
July 9, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: The Eagles have plenty of money....not about expensive. Well if the player is better for us, then Blank would have to be the BU
July 9, 20242 yr 7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: If there is a better S Blank would be fine as a depth guy for now. I want the best players on the field A third S gets plenty of time on the field anyway. But yeah would be nice if we could upgrade and make Blankenship our third S. I see Adams as a very nice complimentary S to CGJ and Milk Check.
July 9, 20242 yr 9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Both I’d say would be the best S on our roster. So that's the issue... you would say that. So safe to assume those guys would want to start. We have our starters at S. After Byard disaster.... I don't think we bring in any back up that would have that idea of being a starter. For the player nor the fans like you.
July 9, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: You don't think he would prefer to go a place where he would start? Of course he’d prefer that. But he’s had a rough go of things the last two seasons that probably won’t afford him that opportunity. Not unless he wishes to hold out until during the season.
July 9, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: A third S gets plenty of time on the field anyway. But yeah would be nice if we could upgrade and make Blankenship our third S. I see Adams as a very nice complimentary S to CGJ and Milk Check. I still don't know what the plans are for DeJean. I know he wants to play,but where?
July 9, 20242 yr 39 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Being a better option than Quez is hardly saying anything much positive. These are some terrible stats Roob dug up on Campbell. If he remains our clear cut third option….not looking promising. Shouldn’t have to explain how it will hold back being an elite O if we have such an obvious weak link out on the field consistently. Very limiting in the case of either of the top two WR not being able to suit up. Better fit....absolutely a positive.
July 9, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Better fit....absolutely a positive. Ainias can play out also,it's not his prime spot,but he can still do it and we have a few other guys that we don't hear about. Maybe they are fine as BU's but we never hear anything
July 9, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I don't care he DIGRESSED and now we want to see him PROgress Of course you don’t care. We have an actual QB coach this season plus an actual O scheme…would seem to obviously be of assistance to our QB. But if you thought he took a step back from being the top QB from 2022 in 2023…I can agree with that. This is all why I just want the best O mind we can get for our O to thrive. Would you agree with the obvious statement of Steichen is better than Johnson was as an O minded coach?
July 9, 20242 yr 5 minutes ago, joemas6 said: So that's the issue... you would say that. So safe to assume those guys would want to start. We have our starters at S. After Byard disaster.... I don't think we bring in any back up that would have that idea of being a starter. For the player nor the fans like you. Simmons has every reason to expect to start. Adams isn’t on that high footing currently in his career after these past two seasons.
July 9, 20242 yr Author https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/PHI Ross,and Johnny are depth players
July 9, 20242 yr 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I still don't know what the plans are for DeJean. I know he wants to play,but where? Just using some common sense to make an educated guess. Maddox has proven to really struggle with durability and is only a short term one year signing. I believe DeJean is on the fast track to being the starting Slot CB.
July 9, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Of course you don’t care. We have an actual QB coach this season plus an actual O scheme…would seem to obviously be of assistance to our QB. But if you thought he took a step back from being the top QB from 2022 in 2023…I can agree with that. This is all why I just want the best O mind we can get for our O to thrive. Would you agree with the obvious statement of Steichen is better than Johnson was as an O minded coach? Yes I would agree,but he is not here,the QB is the general ON THE FIELD and he was part of the collapse and the bonehead mistakes need to STOP. no more SB drops,no more JV EZ sacks,would you agree??
July 9, 20242 yr 9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Well if the player is better for us, then Blank would have to be the BU Blankenship and CGJ are the starters.
July 9, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: https://www.ourlads.com/nfldepthcharts/depthchart/PHI Ross,and Johnny are depth players Ross is one step away from getting a job at a car lot. Johnny? Hurts is trying hard to develop to become what this team really needs.
July 9, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Blankenship and CGJ are the starters. And what if those 2 are better than Blank,just ignore that?
July 9, 20242 yr 8 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Better fit....absolutely a positive. Not sure if such a pathetically low yards per target WR is a better fit for anybody…anywhere.
July 9, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Ross is one step away from getting a job at a car lot. Johnny? Hurts is trying hard to develop to become what this team really needs. Hurts is not developing anyone we have coaches for that. Playing pitch and catch is not "developing" someone,stop with the Hurts is a god BS
Create an account or sign in to comment