4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is the guy that fragile? He needs to get his feet wet some time

SO if you broke your leg and 2 weeks later and I forced you to run the 400M would you be "fragile" or I would I be stupid for making you run it with the whole track season ahead?

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Almost by definition the guys you are referring to would be the least likely to be coveted by the other teams.

Then what is the point of playing them if nobody else wants them? To showcase how bad they are?

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Is the guy that fragile? He needs to get his feet wet some time

IDK how fragile he is, he wasn't fragile at Iowa,but if you keep rushing him back he's going to be fragile all year. You always talk about rushing guys back,but now it's fine? Especially with a rookie who is learning? Our are RG's all "fragile"? Apparently they are

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

The thinking would be to have two WR on the PS to call up. Like possibly Ross, Parris, Ngata or Ainias

So look at the list. Which 2 do you roster that could replace AJ OR DSmith in any given game that you don't have to call up later

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

We always keep 4 RBs. So only keeping three would be a surprise. Especially since we have such good competition there this season. We can actually keep a quality fourth…for a change,

We never had an effective RB3 like we do now is why we kept 4.I'd rather have 3 RB's and 5 WR's . If one RB goes down we still have 2 RB's that can play and finish the game at hand before you call one up. I'm not as confident at WR at this point.

4 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Absolutely... could easily happen next week after cuts are made around the league 

 

That's why we cut the TE....probably to get Poe to play in the final preseason game while the injured guys heal up

Yeah cut and release 1 game paycheck LOL

Too many injuries nowadays. The 85 Bears defense would play on broken legs. No more "tough guys" left. We actually should bring back Chips smoothie regimen Why do we get more injuries than other teams? It's a problem

3 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Have a strong feeling Rosie will pull off a trade here before the season starts. Let’s see if he can work some magic. He has some quality ammo to pull some things off. He can start by making up for his Bradberry decisions and get us a fifth round pick back for him.

Trade for  what? Who can fly here and learn the playbook and become acclimated by week 1? Why are we having multiple injuries AGAIN???? Perhaps SOMEONE needs to go through the practice routines and figure out WHY? It's astonishing we have these injury bugs almost every year. Then when everyone gets on the same page we collapse the last 6 games of the year

51 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So bringing a 5th string G will solve that? I mean if you wanted to trade Pickett for a top shelf one I would be all for that

That’s all bringing in this G solved…was a body for this last PS game. Least important of all the PS games. But DeJean looks to get some snaps finally. So that’s about the only reason for me to consider tuning into this one. Which I probably won’t anyway. I’m sure somebody will post a little breakdown of him in his first PS game anyway…,since he’s been hyped pretty big time.

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Just the facts. Not even really a version you’re trying to spin where Siri is doing much of anything of quality himself. His best attribute even you seem to give him is the hiring of Moore. Which is laughably see through situation. Clearly our FO brought in their backup for the HC job they have Siri. But you some how are saying the guy the FO interviewed for the HC job…wasn’t their hire….but Siri’s.  Even after I pointed out how Siri had a presser discussing how it was important for him to be able to retain a couple of his guys on staff …instead of all becoming Moore’s guys. Yet your option stating Moore supposedly is Siri’s guy, You slurp up way too much of this so obvious pathetic deception.

Siri is so bad he led us to a 10-1 start last year?. Howie also got smarter and has had good drafts lately after the Reagor debacle and is finally providing talent. Schwartz always got barrel bottom CHEAP players and he had to make something from nothing. Now we have talent on both sides of the ball and it's time to give Lurie the Lombardi. But no,now we can use the injury excuses again(because they are there AGAIN)

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

That’s all bringing in this G solved…was a body for this last PS game. Least important of all the PS games. But DeJean looks to get some snaps finally. So that’s about the only reason for me to consider tuning into this one. Which I probably won’t anyway. I’m sure somebody will post a little breakdown of him in his first PS game anyway…,since he’s been hyped pretty big time.

Seems pointless. He has to relearn our play calls,get in some form of game shape just to be cut a week from now in a pointless game that doesn't matter in the seasons W/L except either way he can be used as a scapegoat after the game for guys who don't make the cut. put in a scrub we already have 

51 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO if you broke your leg and 2 weeks later and I forced you to run the 400M would you be "fragile" or I would I be stupid for making you run it with the whole track season ahead?

He didn’t break his leg…just pulled a hammy…missed all of camp. Rookie hasn’t done squat yet. So he does need this some. But he does have some durability question marks. But he’s the fifth CB. Not killing us if he gets injured again depth wise. Seems fairly clear the pecking order is Slay, Q, Rodgers, Ringo then DeJean. We might not have much luxuries to just get him on the field…for seasoning purposes once the real games are under way,

52 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Then what is the point of playing them if nobody else wants them? To showcase how bad they are?

I think these guys have earned an opportunity to lay down some film to help their careers. All these guys just fighting for any place in the NFL. They put in all this hard work all year round and for us specifically this summer. But yeah last PS game isn’t much point of a whole lot.

But we need that big headline- ROSTER MOVE!!!! OH yeah BABY!!!! lol

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He didn’t break his leg…just pulled a hammy…missed all of camp. Rookie hasn’t done squat yet. So he does need this some. But he does have some durability question marks. But he’s the fifth CB. Not killing us if he gets injured again depth wise. Seems fairly clear the pecking order is Slay, Q, Rodgers, Ringo then DeJean. We might not have much luxuries to just get him on the field…for seasoning purposes once the real games are under way,

So an every other game reoccurring Hammy is better?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Not killing us if he gets injured again depth wise

Adds more time back onto the learning curve? He is supposedly the nickel slot hardly CB 5 lol

52 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK how fragile he is, he wasn't fragile at Iowa,but if you keep rushing him back he's going to be fragile all year. You always talk about rushing guys back,but now it's fine? Especially with a rookie who is learning? Our are RG's all "fragile"? Apparently they are

He’s missed the whole TC with a hammy. Shouldn’t be rushing him back after all these weeks. He already worked his way up from individual drills to team drills. Seems like he’s ready….if trainer and coach decisions are to be trusted here. Just looking at the timing …he should be ready.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

He’s missed the whole TC with a hammy. Shouldn’t be rushing him back after all these weeks. He already worked his way up from individual drills to team drills. Seems like he’s ready….if trainer and coach decisions are to be trusted here. Just looking at the timing …he should be ready.

You don't trust the coach LOL

51 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So look at the list. Which 2 do you roster that could replace AJ OR DSmith in any given game that you don't have to call up later

I’m on record for saying we don’t have a third WR…in the first place. That’s a starting position. So depth is far from on the roster. But start the season calling up from the PS. Then after all eligible call ups are used up then you cross that bridge. My thoughts have very consistently been need to add a quality third WR.

50 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We never had an effective RB3 like we do now is why we kept 4.I'd rather have 3 RB's and 5 WR's . If one RB goes down we still have 2 RB's that can play and finish the game at hand before you call one up. I'm not as confident at WR at this point.

I’ve historically only wanted to keep 3 RBs. For many reasons…one of which being that fourth wasn’t anybody special anyway. But this year we actually have a quality option to keep as that fourth RB. A guy worth rostering. These WRs aren’t really worth rostering. Basically your logic seems to be based on the WR suck…so we need to keep the extra guy there…instead of keeping the RB that doesn’t suck. Which player will get poached? Which player is more easily replaced?

https://www.delawareonline.com/story/sports/nfl/eagles/2024/08/13/eagles-cooper-dejean-practices-1st-time-training-camp-patriots-after-long-injury-absence/74780859007/

44 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Too many injuries nowadays. The 85 Bears defense would play on broken legs. No more "tough guys" left. We actually should bring back Chips smoothie regimen Why do we get more injuries than other teams? It's a problem

Game is played with so many more specialists and more all around speed these days. A guy that can’t run…just can’t  be on the field as much as he could decades ago. He’s more of a liability these days. You have 300 pounders that can run faster than LBs could back then. So much more of a passing league now versus then.

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’ve historically only wanted to keep 3 RBs. For many reasons…one of which being that fourth wasn’t anybody special anyway. But this year we actually have a quality option to keep as that fourth RB. A guy worth rostering. These WRs aren’t really worth rostering. Basically your logic seems to be based on the WR suck…so we need to keep the extra guy there…instead of keeping the RB that doesn’t suck. Which player will get poached? Which player is more easily replaced?

My logic is we are thin at WR and don't need guys on the PS we have to wait to call up in a game. If we were going 5 wins ok then LOL but we're not. 

But you know we have been blessed with watching Kelce suit up every dang game for years and years.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

My logic it we are thin at WR and don't need guys on the PS we have to wait to call up in a game. If we were going 5 wins ok then LOL but we're not

I have no clue if they suck we haven't seen any play with any consistent time,they are all hurt