September 4, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Why didn’t they? I mean... wouldn't logic tell you they don't think they need to? They elevated a 6th LB to the 53 when Bradberry went on IR. When do they keep 6 off ball LBs? That should tell you about how they feel about their guys. Obviously you feel differently... but it's not about how you feel. It's what they see.
September 4, 20242 yr The DC noted that even though Avonte Maddox has spent more time at safety, he can and will still play nickel.
September 4, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Why would we need an excellent tackler that can cover and blitz? Yeah…no need for a guy like that. We’ll see how well our dominant LBs do real soon. Why don't you call Novacare? Nobody on here makes decisions... you should ask them. I haven't seen camp just had preseason game 3 on in the background... so idk. I didn't know Epps and Edwards were going to play well in 2022 either or CGJ. I have a life that doesn't involve scouting players for free.
September 4, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Didn’t miss anything just seen Vangio said Maddox can and will play in nickel…. Now could I mis read it sure and he was speaking as a possible backup Need a backup Nickel…it isn’t DeJean right now
September 4, 20242 yr 7 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Looking forward to Barkley, Shipley and Milton. Watch out for Milton! Gainwell fighting for a roster spot if they keep 4 RBs. Makes zero sense
September 4, 20242 yr 5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Makes zero sense Right... never made sense. Neither does firing Sirianni after a successful season.
September 4, 20242 yr 11 minutes ago, joemas6 said: I mean... wouldn't logic tell you they don't think they need to? They elevated a 6th LB to the 53 when Bradberry went on IR. When do they keep 6 off ball LBs? That should tell you about how they feel about their guys. Obviously you feel differently... but it's not about how you feel. It's what they see. Van Sumerin and Oreks are ST studs. But Oreks was from Santa Clara team. So he might end up being our best LB…don’t know he missed the whole camp.
September 4, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Right... never made sense. Neither does firing Sirianni after a successful season. Yes your statement never made sense. The first step is realizing your issue.
September 4, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Right... never made sense. Neither does firing Sirianni after a successful season. Doesn’t make much sense we brought Siri back. But my guess is they just didn’t like the options. Far different from liking the guy you take all power from and have to keep until we can make a run at Johnson or Slowak.
September 4, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Van Sumerin and Oreks are ST studs. But Oreks was from Santa Clara team. So he might end up being our best LB…don’t know he missed the whole camp. Right.... we don't know. We aren't supposed to know.
September 4, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Yes your statement never made sense. The first step is realizing your issue. Right.... your issue thinking Gainwell was ever in danger of not making the roster.
September 4, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Right.... we don't know. We aren't supposed to know. We don’t have anyone that’s clearly a starter in front of him is why
September 4, 20242 yr 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Doesn’t make much sense we brought Siri back. But my guess is they just didn’t like the options. Far different from liking the guy you take all power from and have to keep until we can make a run at Johnson or Slowak. Makes absolute sense. The team wanted new coordinators. Team had success with the coach...before those coordinators. So change the coordinators. Very logical. If you use logic and not emotion.
September 4, 20242 yr 21 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Looking forward to Barkley, Shipley and Milton. Watch out for Milton! Gainwell fighting for a roster spot if they keep 4 RBs. How is anybody fighting for a roster spot if we keep 4 if you only named 4?
September 4, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: We don’t have anyone that’s clearly a starter in front of him is why We have Hurts as our starter...because we don't have anyone clearly in front of him. Same for all the starters
September 4, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: How is anybody fighting for a roster spot if we keep 4 if you only named 4? Did we keep 4 on the roster. Where is Milton...the guy who was going to take Gainwell's spot?
September 4, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Makes absolute sense. The team wanted new coordinators. Team had success with the coach...before those coordinators. So change the coordinators. Very logical. If you use logic and not emotion. Rosie just undid his mistake and got Fangio…this time. The logic leads to believe there wasn’t the right HC candidate available forcing the other moves.
September 4, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: We have Hurts as our starter...because we don't have anyone clearly in front of him. Same for all the starters Hurts is clearly a starter…would be why. Geez your logic is terrible today
September 4, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Rosie just undid his mistake and got Fangio…this time. The logic leads to believe there wasn’t the right HC candidate available forcing the other moves. I mean... would have been nice if AZ followed the rules and interviewed Gannon prior to Fangio taking the Miami job instead of like 9 days after he agreed to take the Miami job.
September 4, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Hurts is clearly a starter…would be why. Geez your logic is terrible today Yeah .. Hurts is a starter ....that's why you call him QB1. 1st string like all the other starters.
September 4, 20242 yr So our D would be Sweat, Davis, Carter and Huff with Baun and Dean behind. Assuming Lefleur utilizes three WR looks. Jacobs should have a field day against this. Can you even imagine how long it will take Ceedy to get injured trying a bad tackle on Jacobs…having to back up this situation?
September 4, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Rosie just undid his mistake and got Fangio…this time. The logic leads to believe there wasn’t the right HC candidate available forcing the other moves. Forcing the moves to get rid of the coordinators? They were " forced" to do that? Meaning they would have preferred to keep those guys? Not following....couldn't be that they just didn't think they were good coordinators?
September 4, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, joemas6 said: I mean... would have been nice if AZ followed the rules and interviewed Gannon prior to Fangio taking the Miami job instead of like 9 days after he agreed to take the Miami job. Except you’re forgetting that Fangio straight wouldn’t lie about how the scandal is why he didn’t stay here
September 4, 20242 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: So our D would be Sweat, Davis, Carter and Huff with Baun and Dean behind. Assuming Lefleur utilizes three WR looks. Jacobs should have a field day against this. Can you even imagine how long it will take Ceedy to get injured trying a bad tackle on Jacobs…having to back up this situation? Idk... I guess we shall see. Im looking forward to real football. You sound afraid?
September 4, 20242 yr 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Forcing the moves to get rid of the coordinators? They were " forced" to do that? Meaning they would have preferred to keep those guys? Not following....couldn't be that they just didn't think they were good coordinators? Fangio was getting the DC job…a year late. The HC job goes to an O minded coach. Wasn’t the right guy available. They decided not to force a bad one year HC hire. So they hired Moore and told him the O is his. Essentially a one year job interview.
Create an account or sign in to comment