So why have I ,No Mas and FL, quote "rambled” so much explains why we need to have a physical team approach and mentality? I’ve accepted and admitted my shortcomings. But where’s the acknowledgment from you of how I’m so clearly just struggling to explain such an obvious basic fundamental situation occurring? 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

So why have I ,No Mas and FL, quote "rambled” so much explains why we need to have a physical team approach and mentality? I’ve accepted and admitted my shortcomings. But where’s the acknowledgment from you of how I’m so clearly just struggling to explain such an obvious basic fundamental situation occurring? 

From my viewpoint my "ramble” stems from a whole misunderstanding of why you guys can’t see and understand this most basic obvious situations. I’m going to great lengths just to try and explain why we should have a physical approach. To guys that hard core talk about Eagles football every day. 

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

From my viewpoint my "ramble” stems from a whole misunderstanding of why you guys can’t see and understand this most basic obvious situations. I’m going to great lengths just to try and explain why we should have a physical approach. To guys that hard core talk about Eagles football every day. 

Why does our HC have to keep relearning this fact over and over again? That it only can occur..again each season under the tutelage of an experienced pro OC.

HC on this is just pathetic. But No Mas your just as guilty, though much lesser paid. You keep trying to take this dominating feature of our team strength to spin as needed only as a work around our bad QB.

While league has been zigging like Sheeple to become more finesse and specialists. While the Niners and our GM clearly zagged to take advantage of this dominating league recent trend. 

Everybody designed for coverage finesse players as a priority while relying so much more than ever on substituting specialists to combat the differing situations. This league trend is best exposed as flawed when you punch the finesse players in the mouth by running or passing without the opportunity for opponents to substitute specific run or coverage specialists. 

Exactly what I’ve been favoring. Zig while everybody zags. Identifying how much softer and less players are versatile. What I see as our strength to completely dominate the league by doing…while in this situation it actually being the plan being executed by our GM with our roster. What I’ve understood about that Niners team this whole time. Exactly their path to such success.

What specialists do you bring in when we will run or pass on you? Many teams even lack the huge heavy Nose Gs as an option. Or do you need the coverage more DB than LB guys? Even if you get the correct personnel by having a LB instead of quick small shifty DB against what is a rushing play…the split second of any conflict and doubt is all we need to still be successful.

Why am I having to explain such fundamental football understandings about how if you take the 6’7” super powerful Oline player with hands the size of small planets …and use him to attack and physically punish the opponent…that most athletes aren’t as effective after that occurs…next play…or the bigger understanding is to have the endurance and confidence through all whole four quarters that is a football game.

40 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Maybe it wasn’t actually me that needed to listen or read Siri’s complete statement about physical. AJ is next level as a physical WR. Hurts is as physical as a QB gets. Siri goes on later to make clear that physical isn’t just running the ball but applies to the passing game as well. Sites the pass to Smitty up the middle, that you proclaim Hurts can’t make, to rewatch it focused on the crushing block made by Stoll.

Did you listen... or did you read?   Because if you read... then you are reading what the person wrote... without getting the context of the whole interview

48 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

To us.. you go on and on...not being direct and to the point....and you miss that we probably don't read your long posts...especially when there are a bunch consecutively.  

Maybe give a direct answer first...then go into left field with the detail later if the conversation progresses.

When it seems you try to have great lengths to explain something simple... it either makes it seen like you are just avoiding the subject, just trying to make yourself sound smart, or making us not want to read the novels. 

Seems obvious the fact you claim of just not reading…especially never considering and comprehending my points I’m laying out that whole time. FL especially just feels like just default instinct to counter and argue regardless. Not much actual countering with any winning differing theory as to why anything in my admitted "ramble” isn’t spot on exactly me correctly identifying and trying to explain.

Yes... so as a theme... not new to football... a coach wants his team to be perceived as physical.... as GB said, which teams don't want to be perceived that way?   Which coach wans his players to be soft?

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Did you listen... or did you read?   Because if you read... then you are reading what the person wrote... without getting the context of the whole interview

Maybe I should go back and watch again to see what I’m missing. Actually just read it this time while usually checking out the presser. Maybe you have a point some where…that maybe I just heard what I wanted to hear.

1 minute ago, joemas6 said:

Yes... so as a theme... not new to football... a coach wants his team to be perceived as physical.... as GB said, which teams don't want to be perceived that way?   Which coach wans his players to be soft?

Yes do you actually stooped to the terrible counter of there is any point to be made by going extremely opposite with well what teams try and be soft. Terrible argument. Zero counter relevance that nobody wants to be soft. Just because I’m a very physical sport of football nobody strives for soft has not one shred of baring about the entire history of the sport proving that the most physical team dominates. 
 So going beyond this pathetic counter argument which I just was ashamed that FL attempted and now pathetically you actually repeated. Any team can wish to be anything. But which teams are actually focused on being built to do it better than we are?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Yes do you actually stooped to the terrible counter of there is any point to be made by going extremely opposite with well what teams try and be soft. Terrible argument. Zero counter relevance that nobody wants to be soft. Just because I’m a very physical sport of football nobody strives for soft has not one shred of baring about the entire history of the sport proving that the most physical team dominates. 
 So going beyond this pathetic counter argument which I just was ashamed that FL attempted and now pathetically you actually repeated. Any team can wish to be anything. But which teams are actually focused on being built to do it better than we are?

How is it you can’t ever see any differing approach benefits than just trying to out do the herd following the league trend? I don’t for a second believe you are completely blind to the evolution that’s been occurring across the NFL for decades.

8 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Yes... so as a theme... not new to football... a coach wants his team to be perceived as physical.... as GB said, which teams don't want to be perceived that way?   Which coach wans his players to be soft?

Ok so if we need to not use our biased Eagles team as the example. Let’s just look right at the Niners. Kittle, Deebo…Warner….on and on…they’ve been the lone team that consistently has played and valued a FB even. Just undeniable success. They punch everybody in the mouth and are more physical less specialist finesse team across the board. That’s what they do and their approach. The main team example of while the herd has zigged to smaller less everydown players teams struggle more with physical team.

Are all these other teams that wish to also be physical fielding a roster bigger stronger more dedicated gritty players than our roster? Heck…it’s nothing new…this has been our makeup for years now.

Or explain to me how you don’t have an understanding of how exactly Rosie hasn’t been targeted and prioritizing big strong hard working dedicated gritty players.

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok so if we need to not use our biased Eagles team as the example. Let’s just look right at the Niners. Kittle, Deebo…Warner….on and on…they’ve been the lone team that consistently has played and valued a FB even. Just undeniable success. They punch everybody in the mouth and are more physical less specialist finesse team across the board. That’s what they do and their approach. The main team example of while the herd has zigged to smaller less everydown players teams struggle more with physical team.

Dude....again... stop.   Stop prolonging a dead end conversation. 

We get it... you are using the situation to try to create a bad spin on Siri...give it a rest. 

He wanted to use a general term so as not to pigeon hole anything as a run team or a pass team or a formation team...etc. 

It's that simple... it really is. Move on.

I mean...your QB1 uses corny catch phrases all the time without saying anything...and you try to spin it as great intangibles. 

None of that BS media stuff matters.  

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Dude....again... stop.   Stop prolonging a dead end conversation. 

We get it... you are using the situation to try to create a bad spin on Siri...give it a rest. 

He wanted to use a general term so as not to pigeon hole anything as a run team or a pass team or a formation team...etc. 

It's that simple... it really is. Move on.

Wrong. He clearly made the point of being a physical team running and passing. Check the presser again. He made it very clear what you posted here is just clearly a bad take by you trying to discredit me.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Wrong. He clearly made the point of being a physical team running and passing. Check the presser again. He made it very clear what you posted here is just clearly a bad take by you trying to discredit me.

This is what we’ve clearly been built with an advantage to do as well if not better than the rest of the league:

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

I mean...your QB1 uses corny catch phrases all the time without saying anything...and you try to spin it as great intangibles. 

None of that BS media stuff matters.  

Usually what they decide to say has some ounce of truth behind it. Which for me maybe is just wishful thinking that Siri once again had that light bulb go off to realize that’s who we are.

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Dude....again... stop.   Stop prolonging a dead end conversation. 

We get it... you are using the situation to try to create a bad spin on Siri...give it a rest. 

He wanted to use a general term so as not to pigeon hole anything as a run team or a pass team or a formation team...etc. 

It's that simple... it really is. Move on.

This is exactly what I’ve been stating as fact the whole season. Clearly was upset we missed that Falcons opportunity to cement our identity as the first three weeks being that physical team that will salt away the clock to win at the end and you can’t stop us.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

This is exactly what I’ve been stating as fact the whole season. Clearly was upset we missed that Falcons opportunity to cement our identity as the first three weeks being that physical team that will salt away the clock to win at the end and you can’t stop us.

By getting cute and trying to throw to Saquan he robbed this team of that. The D was shell shocked and absolutely crumbled so quickly afterwards giving them an easy score. Then the shell shocked O comes out and Hurts forces an interception.