3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So wht do you need to announce it.it would show up in the game play???? 

Great picture identifying just how obvious what I’ve been trying to get across is…nothing rocket science brilliance what I’m identifying and stating here. But again….great perfect use of a picture with Captain Obvious. Sadly you aren’t realizing its relevance is clearly siding with me and making fun of yourself.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

More BS,Hurts didn't throw over the middle when Ped was here either. Stop the BS agenda trash it's sickening

By BS sickening trash I’m assuming you mean my understanding of the game clearly identifying an obvious REASON and CAUSE for statistical results

29 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

In case anybody missed the game…and the pressers afterwards: Siri clearly had to give credit to Moore for what occurred. Moore was given the opportunity to do his thing…and shocker(for everybody apparently but me) look at the success.

More BS we have been asking for Hurts to do this for 2 years,but nobody had a clue but you? Joe and I were WAAAAAAAY far ahead of you on this "I called it crap" Get over yourself

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Great picture identifying just how obvious what I’ve been trying to get across is…nothing rocket science brilliance what I’m identifying and stating here. But again….great perfect use of a picture with Captain Obvious. Sadly you aren’t realizing its relevance is clearly siding with me and making fun of yourself.

LMAO yes, stating the obvious in a presser must be a new thing for you?

So name me the teams in the NFL who say "our idenity is a group of big pu**ies .I'll wait

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Why are you answering your own posts? Why do you make 150 posts? Going for the post record on here?

This has been the level I and this Board have been reduced to over time. That I have to step all the way back to just even making sure there’s an understanding that when it’s not so obviously visibly a full moon that we all can agree that it’s still always actually there. Can’t think of any better analogies…that you setup with your own joke.

It's comical seeing you respond to this bone stock responses. I bet you had a subscription to Tiger Beat and Star magazine when you were a teen

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This has been the level I and this Board have been reduced to over time. That I have to step all the way back to just even making sure there’s an understanding that when it’s not so obviously visibly a full moon that we all can agree that it’s still always actually there. Can’t think of any better analogies…that you setup with your own joke.

Anyone understand this post??????

23 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I even have seen what many here identified as a problem with the QB so differently. First freakin’ action of the season backed up in our endzone….Hurts throws that interception. I saw it as reading the D excellent and a full understanding of the NFL throwing window. Now an excellent S(who I identified highly as a draft prospect) McKinney comes across the field for the pick. IMO you guys totally were missing the CAUSE and REASON for the result. It wasn’t our QB can’t read a D and is a turnover machine. It was Dickerson getting owned all game…but in particular two straight plays…more specifically how that turnover was created. Between the DB and the S there was an opening. Hurts clearly identified and went for. Now was it intercepted because he couldn’t read a D? Mind you it as the opposite field S that intercepted even. Or was it CAUSED by Dickersons man dominating him into Hurts so our QB couldn’t get the zip he needed to complete the play in a tight,NFL, window? That DT Slayton(also a player I identified trying to trade for this season) didn’t allow Hurts to finish his throw so it hung in the air enough for the opposite field S to make the play. Just can’t ignore that opposite field S had to be an All Pro player that leads the league in interceptions this season at that.

BS,you need a bigger shovel

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

More BS we have been asking for Hurts to do this for 2 years,but nobody had a clue but you? Joe and I were WAAAAAAAY far ahead of you on this "I called it crap" Get over yourself

I mean you keep perfectly actually making my point while somehow believing it is the opposite supporting your case. You replied to the fact we finally went back to a game Siri even had to clearly credit Moore for providing. Yet you both have exactly been asking for Hurts to do it for two years. My thoughts have been without Moore under Siri is exactly been the burden weighing down our QB an O preventing it.

 So how can you even respond to the clear cut results that Moore’s influence delivered with our O and Hurts…with still claiming anything about two years?

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

LMAO yes, stating the obvious in a presser must be a new thing for you?

Sadly it’s become what I feel I’ve been reduced to here most often: endlessly trying to go through explaining what I consider The Obvious!

3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I mean you keep perfectly actually making my point while somehow believing it is the opposite supporting your case. You replied to the fact we finally went back to a game Siri even had to clearly credit Moore for providing. Yet you both have exactly been asking for Hurts to do it for two years. My thoughts have been without Moore under Siri is exactly been the burden weighing down our QB an O preventing it.

 So how can you even respond to the clear cut results that Moore’s influence delivered with our O and Hurts…with still claiming anything about two years?

SO Siri coached and told Hurts to never throw over the middle? I guess Ped did too? BS. BTW you hated the Moore hire LOL,but now he's excellent? You have more flip flops than a beach warehouse

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

So name me the teams in the NFL who say "our idenity is a group of big pu**ies .I'll wait

Name a team so very clearly focused identifying being built based on big strong hard working players to rely on over the potential higher talented finesse players?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Name a team so very clearly focused identifying being built based on big strong hard working players to rely on over the potential higher talented finesse players?

All of them try to,every SINGLE ONE

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

It's comical seeing you respond to this bone stock responses. I bet you had a subscription to Tiger Beat and Star magazine when you were a teen

See you can’t even credit me with it not just being my response to what the coach finally identifies. This is exactly what I’ve been preaching THE WHOLE TIME!

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

All of them try to,every SINGLE ONE

I'm still waiting for your list of teams that identify as big pu**ies

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

See you can’t even credit me with it not just being my response to what the coach finally identifies. This is exactly what I’ve been preaching THE WHOLE TIME!

UH,every NFL team wants to win the trench war? This is suddenly news to you? We need to identify it now??? What meds did you overdo today?

7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Anyone understand this post??????

Another absolutely spot on response to my statement…where you actually are thinking you are making the opposite point from what it actually is perfectly stating. This is your nonstop endless responses to all the posts I make about what I consider the very obvious game of football. I go to such lengths to try and even explain these fundamental obvious football elements…yet exactly ask this so very often: does anybody here actually understand these basic fundamental understandings about this game?

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

See you can’t even credit me with it not just being my response to what the coach finally identifies. This is exactly what I’ve been preaching THE WHOLE TIME!

Why should I credit you for a reponse that been said since the second football game ever played happened? You weren't even alive then, but you want credit for the obvious? Ridiculous

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Another absolutely spot on response to my statement…where you actually are thinking you are making the opposite point from what it actually is perfectly stating. This is your nonstop endless responses to all the posts I make about what I consider the very obvious game of football. I go to such lengths to try and even explain these fundamental obvious football elements…yet exactly ask this so very often: does anybody here actually understand these basic fundamental understandings about this game?

Comical drivel and droning on and on about nothing

9 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

BS,you need a bigger shovel

Or…maybe you should just have more of an open mind an actual try and process what you read from me before you by default just try and counter and argue against it?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Another absolutely spot on response to my statement…where you actually are thinking you are making the opposite point from what it actually is perfectly stating. This is your nonstop endless responses to all the posts I make about what I consider the very obvious game of football. I go to such lengths to try and even explain these fundamental obvious football elements…yet exactly ask this so very often: does anybody here actually understand these basic fundamental understandings about this game?

How about you answer my queston?????? WHICH NFL TEAMS identify as  "big pu**ies" I'm still waiting for this reposnse

8 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO Siri coached and told Hurts to never throw over the middle? I guess Ped did too? BS. BTW you hated the Moore hire LOL,but now he's excellent? You have more flip flops than a beach warehouse

Actually I’ve been stubbornly endlessly without question consistent. I always said I’m not high on Moore yet still even claimed how much an upgrade to the situation he clearly was and will be.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Or…maybe you should just have more of an open mind an actual try and process what you read from me before you by default just try and counter and argue against it?

LMAO every team wants to identify as physical. Tell me you are smarter than this

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Actually I’ve been stubbornly endlessly without question consistent. I always said I’m not high on Moore yet still even claimed how much an upgrade to the situation he clearly was and will be.

You  hated the Moore hire C'mon now you flip flopper. Just an endless stream of 180's and covering both sides so you can't be wrong.It's stupid