50 minutes ago, Waiting4Someday said:

With everybody getting pushed up at least we can still double dip at TE on Day 3.

Raridon and Royer can probably make a hell of a duo.

I like these quick hitters the 2 minute drill puts out. They gave 5 minutes on some "sleepers". We have discussed all of them in here. It gets frustrating when no one on youtube can point me to any sleepers I havent heard of yet. But credit to this vid for being one of maybe 2 vids I have seen talk about Barham from Michigan.

1 hour ago, NOTW said:

She got fired for being happy that a person who at the very least has extremely questionable journalistic integrity, and most likely is just a horrible person? As a female reporter who probably has a hard time being taken seriously due to losers like Russini she had/has every right to put out what she did which wasn't even controversial. I wouldn't be surprised if she brings a lawsuit against USA Today and gets a settlement.

1 hour ago, Waiting4Someday said:

With everybody getting pushed up at least we can still double dip at TE on Day 3.

"Draftable" TE doesn't mean TE1. This draft has a good number of big slots, H backs and blocking TEs. It has very few guys who can project to be a complete TE.

It's a great draft to replace Calcaterra. It's a **** draft to replace Goedert.

164 (or Jalen Hurts, Ed George)

5 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:

Raridon and Royer can probably make a hell of a duo.

Yeah, I’d be onboard - you got some upside there with some real Y type bodies that can threaten a bit. At the very least I think they can fill in for the Mundt and Calculator roles. Given that Likely, Kolar, Chig, etc. got pretty good money to be TE2/TE3s and how Rams stacked up their TE depth I think it would be an interesting way to use our Day 3 resources.

4 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

"Draftable" TE doesn't mean TE1. This draft has a good number of big slots, H backs and blocking TEs. It has very few guys who can project to be a complete TE.

It's a great draft to replace Calcaterra. It's a **** draft to replace Goedert.

I’m not much of a Sadiq guy and aside from Klare/Delp I’m not in a rush to take a TE on Day 2 - but to your point I think Day 3 should be interesting if we are looking to rebuild that room.

I think I’m at the point of the draft cycle where all my/our guys get pushed up a slot or two - so with that in mind this isn’t gross to me, but I had to make some compromises early and take some TEs late that I normally wouldn’t prefer… certainly far from threading the needle but maybe more realistic.

4 hours ago, Diehardfan said:

Good for him. Have there been 2 stupider people ever to have an affair?

10 hours ago, LeanMeanGM said:

He’s not the best poster in the last 90 days for nothing

No doubt.

6 hours ago, DEagle7 said:

"Draftable" TE doesn't mean TE1. This draft has a good number of big slots, H backs and blocking TEs. It has very few guys who can project to be a complete TE.

It's a great draft to replace Calcaterra. It's a **** draft to replace Goedert.

There aren't many guys (1?) that are definite TE1 from day 1. But Id say there definitely are a bunch who project to be potentially TE1s.

Good news, we have Goedert back 1 more year. This guy has a year to develop more as a blocker while he is TE2. That gives us lots of options in this deep class.

On 4/15/2026 at 10:55 AM, TEW said:

He was drafted to take the top off but he didn't have the traits to actually do it. He was quite obviously not a traits pick. He was a film pick. He got deep in college. It didn't translate because he had college speed, not NFL speed.

😁

32 minutes ago, ManuManu said:

Insurance fraud? Get out of here.

8 hours ago, T-1000 said:

She got fired for being happy that a person who at the very least has extremely questionable journalistic integrity, and most likely is just a horrible person? As a female reporter who probably has a hard time being taken seriously due to losers like Russini she had/has every right to put out what she did which wasn't even controversial. I wouldn't be surprised if she brings a lawsuit against USA Today and gets a settlement.

I thought USA Today was a pretty good paper when it was run by Al Neuharth. Yes it was something of a McPaper, not ever so deep thinking but that was the intent. All the hotels used to have it available. Today they seem to 'sing from the same hymnal' as NY Times, LA Times etc. etc. ad nauseum.