26 minutes ago, Gannan said:

I know you Trumpbots aren't big on facts and reality, but inflation was lower under Biden than it is now. The stock market was doing way better. Planes weren't falling out of the sky. Eradicated diseases weren't coming back. The GDP was expanding and not shrinking. Oh yeah and Biden deported more people in the same span in 2024 than Trump has in 2025.

Appearing on MSNBC's far-left leaning, "Morning Joe", oncologist Dr Ezekiel Emanuel states he is confident that Biden had prostate cancer while president:

"He's had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading. He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days.”

He added: "He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency in 2021. Yes, I don't think there's any disagreement about that."

Dr Emanuel, a far-left Democrat, helped craft the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, and is a former member of Biden's transition team

The cover-up of Biden’s physical & mental health is turning out to be the biggest scandal in modern history.

They ALL lied- No Biden-era official can ever be trusted to hold public office again.

16 minutes ago, It Hurts said:

Appearing on MSNBC's far-left leaning, "Morning Joe", oncologist Dr Ezekiel Emanuel states he is confident that Biden had prostate cancer while president:

"He's had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading. He did not develop it in the last 100 to 200 days.”

He added: "He had it while he was president. He probably had it at the start of his presidency in 2021. Yes, I don't think there's any disagreement about that."

Dr Emanuel, a far-left Democrat, helped craft the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, and is a former member of Biden's transition team

The cover-up of Biden’s physical & mental health is turning out to be the biggest scandal in modern history.

They ALL lied- No Biden-era official can ever be trusted to hold public office again.

JFC....so they didn't test for it. What is the issue here? Many people have cancer for years before symptoms show up if they don't test for it. People over 70 are not expected to test for it.

12 hours ago, lynched1 said:

Impressive display of idiocy. Genetics or pharmaceutical?

you did that

19 minutes ago, barho said:

JFC....so they didn't test for it. What is the issue here? Many people have cancer for years before symptoms show up if they don't test for it. People over 70 are not expected to test for it.

The issue is that 60% of men over 70 get some form of prostate cancer. As the VP and President, if he wasn't tested for it, then it's clearly medical malpractice.

Reasons for not recommending PSA testing for men over 70:

• Lower Life Expectancy:

  Men over 70 may have a shorter life expectancy, making it less likely that they will benefit from early detection and treatment of prostate cancer. 

• Increased Risk of Harm:

  Older men are more likely to experience false positive test results, which can lead to unnecessary biopsies and treatment, including those with potentially harmful side effects. 

• Long Natural History of Prostate Cancer:

  Many prostate cancers in older men are slow-growing and may not cause significant problems during their remaining lifespan. 

• Other Health Concerns:

  Older men may have other medical conditions that are more pressing and require more immediate attention. 

• False Positives and False Negatives:

  PSA tests are not perfect and can lead to both false positive and false negative results, which can cause anxiety and delay appropriate treatment. 

Didn't Trump's medical exam claim he was 220 pounds? So if they lied about that, they are probably lying about a litany of other items, yet you Trumpers don't seem to care about that. Once again you are obsessed with Joe Biden. It's not about the medical exams or his conditions. It's about your derangement.

9 minutes ago, The Norseman said:

The issue is that 60% of men over 70 get some form of prostate cancer. As the VP and President, if he wasn't tested for it, then it's clearly medical malpractice.

WRONG

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in men aged 70 and older. This is because the potential benefits of screening for prostate cancer in this age group are outweighed by the potential harms. However, some men in this age group may still undergo PSA testing, and there are varying opinions on whether it should be considered in healthy, older men. 

11 minutes ago, barho said:

WRONG

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends against routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing in men aged 70 and older. This is because the potential benefits of screening for prostate cancer in this age group are outweighed by the potential harms. However, some men in this age group may still undergo PSA testing, and there are varying opinions on whether it should be considered in healthy, older men. 

Maybe you should read their history on PSA testing. This is not the dunking you think it is.

2 minutes ago, BBE said:

Maybe you should read their history on PSA testing. This is not the dunking you think it is.

What history? Please, indulge me.

I don't get why this is such a thing unless you're not smart enough to know SIMPLY that your risk of getting cancer increases as you age. The treatments that are available to treat cancer in people over age 70 may do more harm than good. It really is up to the patient and the oncology team who do mostly follow the NCCN guidelines, but remember they are just that. Guidelines.

Elevated PSA levels would just be an indicator to perform a manual exam, and if needed, followed by a biopsy anyway. You can have high PSA levels and no cancer. Do you trumpbots really think he was diagnosed years ago and delayed treatment just to keep things quiet? Do you understand how retarded that sounds when you say it out loud?

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

Elevated PSA levels would just be an indicator to perform a manual exam, and if needed, followed by a biopsy anyway. You can have high PSA levels and no cancer. Do you trumpbots really think he was diagnosed years ago and delayed treatment just to keep things quiet? Do you understand how retarded that sounds when you say it out loud?

No, I think he was diagnosed years ago and has been under treatment the whole time.

Just now, The Norseman said:

No, I think he was diagnosed years ago and has been under treatment the whole time.

And how do you think they treat prostate cancer?

6 minutes ago, barho said:

What history? Please, indulge me.

Historically, due to the prevalence of false positives, the USPSTF had not recommended PSA screening for any male at any age. They recently in 2018 changed it to a "personal choice" for men from 50 - 69 (may be wrong on the low end of that band).

2 minutes ago, BBE said:

Historically, due to the prevalence of false positives, the USPSTF had not recommended PSA screening for any male at any age. They recently in 2018 changed it to a "personal choice" for men from 50 - 69 (may be wrong on the low end of that band).

Ok but that is to age 69. I said it wasn’t recommended for age 70 and up. Therefore not malpractice

4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

And how do you think they treat prostate cancer?

depends on the form

3 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:

And how do you think they treat prostate cancer?

Prayer and horse medicine.

2 minutes ago, The Norseman said:

depends on the form

And in your scenario where he had been diagnosed years ago and had been secretly getting treatment, which form did he have and what were the treatments?

2 minutes ago, barho said:

Ok but that is to age 69. I said it wasn’t recommended for age 70 and up. Therefore not malpractice

PSA wasn't recommended by that task force for any male of any age and "the personal choice" language is not a recommendation. As wgb indicated, PSA testing is not the end all be all of prostate cancer screening.

Just now, we_gotta_believe said:

And in your scenario where he had been diagnosed years ago and had been secretly getting treatment, which form did he have and what were the treatments?

Unclear based on the information released. But they did say that it was responsive to hormone treatment....which can have various side effects that could explain some of his "moments" over the last four years.

I honestly don't know why you guys are fighting this. In my mind, being under treatment would get Biden off the hook for much of his frailty and cognitive issues.

2 minutes ago, The Norseman said:

Unclear based on the information released

And yet you think there's enough to prove he had been diagnosed years ago? Mmmkay

sounds like we have some theories, again.

1 minute ago, we_gotta_believe said:

And yet you think there's enough to prove he had been diagnosed years ago? Mmmkay

Dude, he was the VP and then the President. They go through regular medical evaluations far more extensive than the average person does. There is no scenario where he wasn't tested or didn't know that he had stage 4 prostate cancer which had metastasized into his bones prior to the release of that information. His son died of cancer for god's sake, of course he would get regular tests.