April 27, 20215 yr 40 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: Spoken like a man who's never been married. Also, nothing in my post implied that I'm against this proposal, but if Hawley's kiss of death is associated with it, you can guarantee it's DOA. Weirdly, people don't rally behind co-workers who support angry mobs hanging them. It's OK, van, everyone in here knows your thought process isn't going to advance beyond "Hawley bad." No need to actually have any real positions on anything.
April 27, 20215 yr 2 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yeah, I think that ship may have sailed in America a few decades ago, Mr. principled libertarian. The government is going to be involved in "social engineering." The question becomes do we want the to incentivize healthy, productive behavior or continue on the path of complete and utter idiocy. You're a hardcore dem at this point, so that's more of a question for the rest of CVON. No need to answer yourself. I wouldn't call couples staying married just for financial reasons healthy or productive.
April 27, 20215 yr 44 minutes ago, Kz! said: Yeah, I think that ship may have sailed in America a few decades ago, Mr. principled libertarian. The government is going to be involved in "social engineering." The question becomes do we want the to incentivize healthy, productive behavior or continue on the path of complete and utter idiocy. You're a hardcore dem at this point, so that's more of a question for the rest of CVON. No need to answer yourself. You come up with absurd arguments by the sackful in this forum, but you've outdone yourself with the logical fallacies in this one. It's going to happen anyway so just embrace it? Why don't you apply that logic to military intervention, illegals crossing the border, and all the other things that trigger you, like black people being able to vote? Do you hear that? It's the sound of the short bus and it honks for thee.
April 27, 20215 yr 6 minutes ago, Kz! said: It's OK, van, everyone in here knows your thought process isn't going to advance beyond "Hawley bad." No need to actually have any real positions on anything. I mean, obviously Hawley sucks, but more than that he'll never be in any way effective at his job. No one will ever get behind any of his proposals because he, you know, supported a mob that wanted to kill all his colleagues. All he'll ever do is propose DOA bills for show and idiots like yourself will lap it up and praise him for it.
April 27, 20215 yr 6 minutes ago, Gannan said: You come up with absurd arguments by the sackful in this forum, but you've outdone yourself with the logical fallacies in this one. It's going to happen anyway so just embrace it? Why don't you apply that logic to military intervention, illegals crossing the border, and all the other things that trigger you, like black people being able to vote? Do you heart that? It's the sound of the short bus and it honks for thee. lol the government can easily alter policies on ME military intervention and illegals crossing the border, and politicians on both sides have expressed interest in doing so (and they're also pretty popular among voters). What no politician on either side will do is touch handouts. Everyone knows it. It's political suicide. Might as well incentivize good behavior instead of bad. I know, another totally radical position to have. 1 minute ago, VanHammersly said: I mean, obviously Hawley sucks, but more than that he'll never be in any way effective at his job. No one will ever get behind any of his proposals because he, you know, supported a mob that wanted to kill all his colleagues. All he'll ever do is propose DOA bills for show and idiots like yourself will lap it up and praise him for it. Wow. I swear I don't have access to a time machine or crystal ball: 9 minutes ago, Kz! said: It's OK, van, everyone in here knows your thought process isn't going to advance beyond "Hawley bad." No need to actually have any real positions on anything. How is it that I'm incapable of missing? Eerie.
April 27, 20215 yr 10 minutes ago, Kz! said: Wow. I swear I don't have access to a time machine or crystal ball: How is it that I'm incapable of missing? Eerie. I love it when you act like you're interested in having a substantive policy discussion.
April 27, 20215 yr @Kz! supports people staying in bad marriages for tax reasons. Yet another swing and miss, for the "Mighty" Kz has just struck out. Again. Just now, Joe Shades 73 said: Is there really any hope the Republicans don't take back the house? Well in your world there is no hope for anything, so I dont think this question can be answered.
April 27, 20215 yr 1 minute ago, Boogyman said: @Kz! supports people staying in bad marriages for tax reasons. Yet another swing and miss, for the "Mighty" Kz has just struck out. Again. Well in your world there is no hope for anything, so I dont think this question can be answered. True
April 27, 20215 yr 2 minutes ago, Joe Shades 73 said: Is there really any hope the Republicans don't take back the house? In 2022? I wouldn’t worry about it. The human race will be extinct by then.
April 27, 20215 yr Today's Troll Fact The female of the species usually lives beneath outhouses where she lays her eggs. The male of the species, Tucker Carlson, will squat over the hole and 'fertilize' the eggs by speaking - the foaming, frothy shite that comes out doesn't do anything besides stink. The eggs are fertilized before being lain, as the female has been banging white supremacists who lives in their mom's basement.
April 27, 20215 yr 18 hours ago, Kz! said: Policies like this should be the future of the GOP with men like Hawley leading the way: Incentivizing marriage and offering a tax break? It's obviously not something democrats would ever support, but I'm here for it. Sounds like something along the lines of what Sen. Warren and Sen. Gillibrand already propose: universal childcare, increased credits for working parents... And Biden's American Families Plan. So the future of GOP is to be more like Democrats?
April 27, 20215 yr 21 minutes ago, Joe Shades 73 said: Is there really any hope the Republicans don't take back the house? The majority of republicans think elections are pointless and rigged so yes.
April 27, 20215 yr 3 minutes ago, toolg said: Sounds like something along the lines of what Sen. Warren and Sen. Gillibrand already propose: universal childcare, increased credits for working parents... And Biden's American Families Plan. So the future of GOP is to be more like Democrats? Just what we need more people that should not be parents having kids
April 27, 20215 yr 39 minutes ago, Boogyman said: @Kz! supports people staying in bad marriages for tax reasons. Yet another swing and miss, for the "Mighty" Kz has just struck out. Again. Well in your world there is no hope for anything, so I dont think this question can be answered. That certainly is a retarded ishlib interpretation of Hawley's proposal. 22 minutes ago, toolg said: Sounds like something along the lines of what Sen. Warren and Sen. Gillibrand already propose: universal childcare, increased credits for working parents... And Biden's American Families Plan. So the future of GOP is to be more like Democrats? No, it's actually nothing like those things at all. Other than that, great post.
April 27, 20215 yr 1 hour ago, Kz! said: That certainly is a retarded ishlib interpretation of Hawley's proposal. So are you saying that wouldn't happen, and probably happen a lot? Especially amongst lower income families?
April 27, 20215 yr Hawley's proposal is pretty simple and consistent with the new republican party. Free stuff for married straight white people. Everyone else is on their own.
April 27, 20215 yr 43 minutes ago, Boogyman said: So are you saying that wouldn't happen, and probably happen a lot? Especially amongst lower income families? I'm saying the data is so overwhelmingly positive in regards to the benefits of children being raised in two-parent households that it would outweigh the negative of your random hypothetical that it might increase domestic violence in "lower income families." 41 minutes ago, Gannan said: Hawley's proposal is pretty simple and consistent with the new republican party. Free stuff for married straight white people. Everyone else is on their own. Oh, yeah, Hawley definitely added in the "white people only" clause. Ishlibs gonna ishlib.
April 27, 20215 yr 27 minutes ago, Kz! said: I'm saying the data is so overwhelmingly positive in regards to the benefits of children being raised in two-parent households that it would outweigh the negative of your random hypothetical that it might increase domestic violence in "lower income families." Oh, yeah, Hawley definitely added in the "white people only" clause. Ishlibs gonna ishlib. Just admit you want this so when you get married your wife won't leave you after you beat her.
April 27, 20215 yr 11 minutes ago, Boogyman said: Just admit you want this so when you get married your wife won't leave you after you beat her. @downundermike do your thing.
April 27, 20215 yr 4 minutes ago, Kz! said: @downundermike do your thing. Stop looking for help twerp
April 27, 20215 yr 46 minutes ago, Kz! said: Oh, yeah, Hawley definitely added in the "white people only" clause. Ishlibs gonna ishlib.
April 27, 20215 yr 9 minutes ago, vikas83 said: @Boogyman Yeah, I'd delete that. That's over the line. He already went there. I can't help I am better at this than he is.
Create an account or sign in to comment