2 minutes ago, DEagle7 said:

CDC intensified recommendations when there was a more deadly variant popped up and more data cane to light, and it was fear mongering and government overreach.  Now they've softened quarantine protocols in the setting of a less deadly variant and more research into the infectious phase, and it's an admission of defeat and proof that they've been lying all along.

 

Many of the guidelines they set were completely arbitrary from the start. Cloth masks, particularly, are worthless and they've known it for a long time. But you're right, it's all good because The Science is just changing is all.  

9 minutes ago, Kz! said:

You know the argument is strong when the made up quotes come out!   

Oh, did you miss the post where I quoted you multiple times?  Was that a different KZ! poster making all those posts?

Insanely good week for the Defiant L's Twitter account. This dude has endless amounts of material to pull from.   

17 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Is your wife an anti-vaxxer??

What? So try attacks because you can't answer a question. 

But I'm happily not married so try again. 

 

17 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

Again, I'm sure you really believe that. And that's the beauty of living in the "I may be borderline mentally retarded but I create my own reality" bubble.

Go hard.

If you wanna see borderline mentally retarded, go check out your posts from the aftermath of the Kenosha riots about Kyle Rittenhouse.  

Just now, Phillyterp85 said:

Oh, did you miss the post where I quoted you multiple times?  Was that a different KZ! poster making all those posts?

To answer your question, yes, the survivability rate is incredibly high. I stand by that now, more than ever, obviously.  

Just now, mikemack8 said:

If you wanna see borderline mentally retarded, go check out your posts from the aftermath of the Kenosha riots about Kyle Rittenhouse.  

Forget the aftermath of the incident, this dude was in here saying Rittenhouse should be charged even after the trial brought everything to light. When I asked him what exactly he should be charged with, Mayanh8 evacuated the thread.  

Just now, Kz! said:

To answer your question, yes, the survivability rate is incredibly high. I stand by that now, more than ever, obviously.  

Oh, so then what does Rogan and Rodgers taking ivermectin have to do with their survival of COVID?  You can't spend months on end talking about the 99.99% survival rate of COVID and how it's pointless to take vaccines for something with a 99.99% survival rate.  And then do a complete reversal and claim that ivermectin is responsible for people surviving said virus that you've long been pointing out has a 99.99% survival rate. 

Do you understand the difference between causation and correlation?

5 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

What? So try attacks because you can't answer a question. 

But I'm happily not married so try again. 

 

How is asking if she’s an anti-vaxxer an attack?

4 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

How is asking if she’s an anti-vaxxer an attack?

So doesn't the evidence show that this isn't a kid killer and really no need to give them the vaccine? 

Still waiting for this answer. 

Here is a data point to help you out. 

790 kids between the ages of 0-18 years old out of 807, 773 have died in the US because of COVID. 

https://data.cdc.gov/widgets/nr4s-juj3?mobile_redirect=true

 

2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

How is asking if she’s an anti-vaxxer an attack?

Sure, there's not negative connotation attached to the term "anti-vaxxer." I can't imagine why he would take issue with that.

3 hours ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Sure thing. For starters, from the very link you posted (but apparently didn't read): 

And this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34181716/

And this: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2777389

And this:https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/8/11/ofab358/6316214

 

 

An analysis of 71 studies on Ivermectin suggest otherwise.

7 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

So doesn't the evidence show that this isn't a kid killer and really no need to give them the vaccine? 

Still waiting for this answer. 

Measles / mumps isn’t really a kid killer either. Kills less than 1 percent of kids that get it.

4 minutes ago, Kz! said:

Forget the aftermath of the incident, this dude was in here saying Rittenhouse should be charged even after the trial brought everything to light. When I asked him what exactly he should be charged with, Mayanh8 evacuated the thread.  

More invented reality. 

I'd challenge you to quote anything other than me saying "if firearm laws were broken he should be held responsible for his part" but we both know you can't. So I'll sit here wait for the inevitable one liner deflection and the change of topic.

5 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:

Oh, so then what does Rogan and Rodgers taking ivermectin have to do with their survival of COVID?  You can't spend months on end talking about the 99.99% survival rate of COVID and how it's pointless to take vaccines for something with a 99.99% survival rate.  And then do a complete reversal and claim that ivermectin is responsible for people surviving said virus that you've long been pointing out has a 99.99% survival rate. 

Do you understand the difference between causation and correlation?

Jesus, you're like autistic or something. The main point of my post wasn't to praise ivermectin, you moron. It was to make fun of the people who criticize Rogan and Rodgers as conspiracy theory lunatics for not getting the vaccine. Both of them got Covid and beat it in about 48 hours. Their personal strategies worked perfectly. They got the virus and recovered almost instantly. Look here's the conversation:

2 hours ago, mikemack8 said:

Rodgers is a peckerhead but he's pretty much nailed the COVID thing.  He and Rogan should take over for Fauci immediately

 

2 hours ago, Kz! said:

Fauci: Get an unlimited and undefined number of mRNA shots, don't travel, wear masks in the shower, don't visit family and friends.

Joe Rogan/Aaron Rodgers: No shots or lifestyle changes for me, I'll just get Covid and beat it in 2 days with therapeutics the experts hate.

Yep, it checks out. 

So, yeah, the two dudes who kept living their lives and didn't worry about the shots and living in terrified isolation ended up being right in this situation, and team Fauci "stay locked in your basement until you get the 7th booster" took an L. That was my point. But yeah, the combination of being healthy individuals and the monoclonal antibodies and ivermectin did well for them. No eff off, weirdo. lmfao

On 12/22/2021 at 4:07 PM, Dave Moss said:

Worrying about people’s height on an anonymous message board is hilarious

Shut up shorty!

1 minute ago, greend said:

Shut up shorty!

I’m short and bald, but I’m a spring chicken compared to you.

 

2 minutes ago, Dave Moss said:

Measles / mumps isn’t really a kid killer either. Kills roughly 1 to 2 percent of kids that get it.

Yes. Measles has been around for hundreds of years so is evidence and data to back up getting a vaccination is beneficial to a child. 

Just now, Dave Moss said:

I’m short and bald, but I’m a spring chicken compared to you.

 

So you're the tallest midget little person

2 minutes ago, greend said:

So you're the tallest midget little person

Pretty much.  

10 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

More invented reality. 

I'd challenge you to quote anything other than me saying "if firearm laws were broken he should be held responsible for his part" but we both know you can't. So I'll sit here wait for the inevitable one liner deflection and the change of topic.

 

On 11/17/2021 at 10:31 AM, mayanh8 said:

I'll repeat what I said almost a year ago when this happened. If the little turd who clearly wanted to start some sh** with the rioters broke any laws while by bringing that AR to the show then he's at least legally responsible for his part. I'd hope there's some sort of accountability there. I equate that with drunk driving. You can't get into a car drunk, hit someone who's jay walking, and then only point the finger at the pedestrian. 

That being said, he's got the right to defend himself. He's not a murderer. He's dope kid who thought it'd be a good idea to go pick a fight with rioters. I have no clue what prosecutors are going for but something along the lines of a weak manslaughter charge, to me, would be appropriate assuming he broke the law to get himself there. He gets a year in jail and then has a chance to continue on with his life.

Oh just something along the lines of a "weak manslaughter charge." lmfao, bye ****.

8 minutes ago, DaEagles4Life said:

Yes. Measles has been around for hundreds of years so is evidence and data to back up getting a vaccination is beneficial to a child. 

Talk to a pediatrician.  They’ll tell you to get your kid vaccinated.  Have a nice day, guy.

5 minutes ago, Kz! said:

 

Oh just something along the lines of a "weak manslaughter charge." lmfao, bye ****.

"assuming he broke the law to get himself there"

I mean... we can all read. Again, you're living in your own mentally retarded bubble where we're all as stupid as you and you think we can't read for ourselves. Clearly, the statement was made that if he broke the law he should be charged. 

I never actually though you'd quote me proving me right. But you just can't help yourself, yet again, from your own predisposition to self own. I've never seen anything like it.

2 minutes ago, mayanh8 said:

"assuming he broke the law to get himself there"

I mean... we can all read. Again, you're living in your own mentally retarded bubble where we're all as stupid as you and you think we can't read for ourselves. Clearly, the statement was made that if he broke the law he should be charged. 

But you just can't help yourself, yet again, from your own predisposition to self own. I've never seen anything like it.

Except, at that point, it was painfully obvious that he hadn't broken any other laws. This was when the jury was deliberating after all the facts of the trial had come out. I asked you later in that thread to articulate a law that was broken and you bailed. Again, you wanted a him hit was a "weak manslaughter charge" for reasons you couldn't articulate. You took a huge L after the riots reeing about state lines, and you took another one right after the trial, and for some reason, because you're incapable of learning, you insist on taking another one right now.   

1 hour ago, mayanh8 said:

^^^^^ This post right here is a microcosm of all that has gone wrong for the human species in the last several decades.

A revolution of thoroughly unserious people with with little-to-no information on any given subject slowly replacing what would otherwise be class of highly educated, serious experts in their fields. The human race is halfway to Idiocracy, and we're running towards it with our eyes wide open.

An unfortunate symptom of the times and the social media platforms of today.