August 11Aug 11 https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/6021019-paul-johnson-release-fauci-texts/In a January 2021 text chain Fauci was on with Drs. Vivek Murthy and Rochelle Walensky — the surgeon general and director, respectively, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the Biden administration — the trio discussed when pregnant women should get the COVID-19 vaccine. Murthy asked on Jan. 25, "For pregnant women considering getting the vaccine, are you aware of any data or theoretical reason why vaccinating early vs late in pregnancy would be preferred? And any sense of when there will be more robust data on vaccine risk in pregnant women?”After Walensky noted that 15,000-plus pregnant women were enrolled in the CDC’s V-safe vaccine safety monitoring system, Fauci wrote there "are no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred.”Fauci added, "Yet, some people (even female health care professionals) feel concerned about injecting a ‘genetic’ vaccine very early in pregnancy.”The then-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) also wrote there "is this misperception” the mRNA vaccine impacts recipients’ genes. Nearly two hours later, Fauci wrote, "I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”Cytokines are a broad category of proteins that function as chemical messengers in one’s immune system.Walensky and Murthy agreed with Fauci, writing he made a "good point.”Then on Jan. 26, amid a discussion on the World Health Organization advising against pregnant women taking the Moderna vaccine, Fauci wrote pregnant women "must weigh the potential risks against the benefits” of getting immunized. "COVID-19 can be a serious disease especially in pregnancy,” Fauci noted, adding that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists permitted pregnant women to choose whether to get the vaccine. A week after his text conversation with Murthy and Walensky, Fauci said the FDA had so far found "no red flags” among the 10,000-plus pregnant women who participated in COVID vaccine trials to that point."I would rather take my chances with the vaccine than getting infected while I’m pregnant, because of the adverse effect and adverse outcome on pregnancy [of getting COVID],” Fauci told Dr. Howard Bauchner, then the editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association.So Fauci speculated about a potential risk to pregnant women, a risk that is actually higher if you catch Covid (cytokines storm) than from a vaccine. This, again, is not a gotcha. It's open discussion about potential risks so that the data can be interrogated for it. Every vaccine is a tradeoff. Some will have adverse effects. You'll always find outliers that buck the trend. But many times more lives are saved by vaccines than lost to them. It's preposterous we have to share the same air as these idiots.
August 11Aug 11 1 hour ago, lynched1 said:People dying all over the place and health care workers are pushed to the edge performing choreographed dance routines.This really happened. This on had drones....You have about as many functioning brain cells left as your profile picture.
August 11Aug 11 53 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/6021019-paul-johnson-release-fauci-texts/In a January 2021 text chain Fauci was on with Drs. Vivek Murthy and Rochelle Walensky — the surgeon general and director, respectively, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) during the Biden administration — the trio discussed when pregnant women should get the COVID-19 vaccine.Murthy asked on Jan. 25, "For pregnant women considering getting the vaccine, are you aware of any data or theoretical reason why vaccinating early vs late in pregnancy would be preferred? And any sense of when there will be more robust data on vaccine risk in pregnant women?”After Walensky noted that 15,000-plus pregnant women were enrolled in the CDC’s V-safe vaccine safety monitoring system, Fauci wrote there "are no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred.”Fauci added, "Yet, some people (even female health care professionals) feel concerned about injecting a ‘genetic’ vaccine very early in pregnancy.”The then-director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) also wrote there "is this misperception” the mRNA vaccine impacts recipients’ genes.Nearly two hours later, Fauci wrote, "I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”Cytokines are a broad category of proteins that function as chemical messengers in one’s immune system.Walensky and Murthy agreed with Fauci, writing he made a "good point.”Then on Jan. 26, amid a discussion on the World Health Organization advising against pregnant women taking the Moderna vaccine, Fauci wrote pregnant women "must weigh the potential risks against the benefits” of getting immunized."COVID-19 can be a serious disease especially in pregnancy,” Fauci noted, adding that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the CDC’s vaccine advisory panel and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists permitted pregnant women to choose whether to get the vaccine.A week after his text conversation with Murthy and Walensky, Fauci said the FDA had so far found "no red flags” among the 10,000-plus pregnant women who participated in COVID vaccine trials to that point."I would rather take my chances with the vaccine than getting infected while I’m pregnant, because of the adverse effect and adverse outcome on pregnancy [of getting COVID],” Fauci told Dr. Howard Bauchner, then the editor-in-chief of the Journal of the American Medical Association.So Fauci speculated about a potential risk to pregnant women, a risk that is actually higher if you catch Covid (cytokines storm) than from a vaccine. This, again, is not a gotcha. It's open discussion about potential risks so that the data can be interrogated for it.Every vaccine is a tradeoff. Some will have adverse effects. You'll always find outliers that buck the trend. But many times more lives are saved by vaccines than lost to them.It's preposterous we have to share the same air as these idiots.John trying to make excuses for the guy who took the 5th. lolololol
August 11Aug 11 Y'all are missing the best part. A cytokine reaction is what's at play when people fight off an infection. Fever, aches, chills those are largely cytokine reactions.There is exactly one safe medication for the treatment of fever/aches/chills (and their risk to the fetus) in pregnancy: Tylenol. Everyone remember when the Kennedy and Trump made a completely made up claim that Tylenol in pregnancy causes autism? I don't seem to remember the same interest in cytokine reactions then by Bojack and Slingblade. Weird...
August 11Aug 11 7 hours ago, Procus said:John trying to make excuses for the guy who took the 5th. lolololol7 hours ago, Procus said:8 hours ago, JohnSnowsHair said:It's preposterous we have to share the same air as these idiots.
August 11Aug 11 "If we're being honest," Newton said on his podcast, "Going back to 2020, there were multiple players, coaches, and executives that fraudulently got their COVID shot. Yes, I said it."That allegation supports what Rodgers said last week in the middle of what was mostly a viral criticism of Anthony Fauci's testimony in front of the United States Senate.
August 11Aug 11 Everyone should definitely get medical advice from these two shining beacons of health
August 13Aug 13 Fauci covered up the data that revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester.
August 13Aug 13 1 hour ago, lynched1 said:Fauci covered up the data that revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester.No. No he didn't. The guy behind that claim, James Thorp, posted multiple articles about the COVID vaccine and pregnancy during the pandemic. Nothing was "covered up". He just only posted them on sheetholes like "The Epoch Times" where no one pays attention to them other that dumbFs like you who get links fed to them on Facebook by their dumbF relatives. He's a quack who does telemed visits only best I can tell.He got the 82% number by taking an existing (way underpowered) study about stillbirths and the COVID vaccine, then for some reason claimed that all people who received the COVID vaccine outside the first trimester should be removed. Which 1) isn't how statistical analysis works, and 2) left him without a cohort of about 100 cherry picked people. Meanwhile here's what meta analysis published in Nature (not the Epoch Times) of the data on stillborn rates and COVID vaccine taken from over 100,000 patients (which is larger than 100) shows:https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-30052-w"Safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy is a particular concern affecting vaccination uptake by this vulnerable group. Here we evaluated evidence from 23 studies including 117,552 COVID-19 vaccinated pregnant people, almost exclusively with mRNA vaccines. We show that the effectiveness of mRNA vaccination against RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection 7 days after second dose was 89·5% (95% CI 69·0-96·4%, 18,828 vaccinated pregnant people, I2 = 73·9%). The risk of stillbirth was significantly lower in the vaccinated cohort by 15% (pooled OR 0·85; 95% CI 0·73–0·99, 66,067 vaccinated vs. 424,624 unvaccinated, I2 = 93·9%). There was no evidence of a higher risk of adverse outcomes including miscarriage, earlier gestation at birth, placental abruption, pulmonary embolism, postpartum haemorrhage, maternal death, intensive care unit admission, lower birthweight Z-score, or neonatal intensive care unit admission (p > 0.05 for all). COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in pregnancy appears to be safe and is associated with a reduction in stillbirth."TLDR: You're a Fing idiot who keeps falling for it. Again and again. An easy mark. Sit. Stay. Good girl.
August 13Aug 13 You would think claiming an 82% miscarriage rate would be the first flag. Critical thinking isn't sloths strong suit.
August 13Aug 13 33 minutes ago, paco said:You would think claiming an 82% miscarriage rate would be the first flag.Critical thinking isn't sloths strong suit.He’s a complete imbecile
August 13Aug 13 49 minutes ago, paco said:You would think claiming an 82% miscarriage rate would be the first flag.Critical thinking isn't sloths strong suit.In his defense, I don't think any type of thinking is his strong suit.
August 13Aug 13 1 hour ago, Lambo said:In his defense, I don't think any type of thinking is his strong suit.PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ARE DOWN 600%!!!!Sloth: This MFer is spitting!
August 18Aug 18 The mayor of a northern Massachusetts town went viral on social media in recent days after his lawyer told reporters the mayor doesn’t speak English when they pressed him about being arrested for COVID-19 pandemic relief fraud.Lawrence Mayor Brian DePeña, 61, was arrested Friday morning after an investigation into his alleged misuse of more than $1.5 million of Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL), a program administered by the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) under the CARES Act to assist struggling businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
August 18Aug 18 An immigrant in Minnesota who once received an "outstanding refugee" award from the state government has been charged with Medicaid fraud, prompting strong backlash on social media.Salman Ahmed Elmi is facing three counts of aiding and abetting by swindle and five counts of aiding and abetting by false representation as part of an alleged scam to bill Medicaid for over $1 million in fraudulent services, Fox 9 Minneapolis reported. The charges also allege that two members involved in the fraud scheme were tied to a sex-trafficking ring involving brothels.
Create an account or sign in to comment