5 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Question Sir why did you feel the need to ask me to give it a rest but don't do the same for dowenunder?

You are likely to listen.  He is Mike.

3 minutes ago, Utebird said:

This is eerily similar to the response from one of your other clone accounts that says, you take this place too serious...

Except that clone doesn't insinuate that being a female is an insult...

Well, he could have criticized you for your spelling, but he didn’t.  Be thankful for small favors.

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

You are likely to listen.  He is Mike.

Fair enough, I put him back on ignore, I really wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt and give my self the benefit of the doubt but I have shown that I obviously can't have productive conversations with him so it's easier and better for me if I just ignore.

Lesson learned, fool me once shame on you fool me twice Shame on me, so Shame on me.

3 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Fair enough, I put him back on ignore, I really wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt and give my self the benefit of the doubt but I have shown that I obviously can't have productive conversations with him so it's easier and better for me if I just ignore.

Lesson learned, fool me once shame on you fool me twice Shame on me, so Shame on me.

False

 

8 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Fair enough, I put him back on ignore, I really wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt and give my self the benefit of the doubt but I have shown that I obviously can't have productive conversations with him so it's easier and better for me if I just ignore.

Lesson learned, fool me once shame on you fool me twice Shame on me, so Shame on me.

Stealing from Scotty, you SOB!

 

 

10 minutes ago, Utebird said:

Fair enough, I put him back on ignore, I really wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt and give my self the benefit of the doubt but I have shown that I obviously can't have productive conversations with him so it's easier and better for me if I just ignore.

Lesson learned, fool me once shame on you fool me twice Shame on me, so Shame on me.

12 minutes ago, Utebird said:

fool me once shame on you fool me twice Shame on me, so Shame on me.

False.

You have put me on ignore at least 5 times.

1 hour ago, Sack that QB said:

4 pack of questions to bide the time til Sunday:

1. If you could only re-sign one, who would you keep: Bradberry or Hargrave?

2. Would you rather be down 3 points with 2 minutes to go and the ball in the SB? Or up 3 points with 2 minutes to go with the Chiefs having the ball? Both teams have all timeouts.

3. Eagles have the ball on the one yard line, tie game, two minutes to go. 4th down. Go for the TD or kick the FG?

4. Eagles up 5 with a little over 2 minutes to go. Chiefs have zero timeouts. Eagles have the ball on the +35 yard line. 4th and 1. Go for it to ice the game and risk the miss and Mahomes getting the ball back with great field position to drive for the win. Or kick the FG make it an 8 point game and guarantee OT at worst?

1. Hargrave

2. Up 3. It’d be scary but the lead is the lead.

3. Kick. The lead is the lead.

4. Go for it. If you get a yard, you win the Super Bowl. If you fail, you’re still ahead. 

1 hour ago, Sack that QB said:

4 pack of questions to bide the time til Sunday:

1. If you could only re-sign one, who would you keep: Bradberry or Hargrave?

2. Would you rather be down 3 points with 2 minutes to go and the ball in the SB? Or up 3 points with 2 minutes to go with the Chiefs having the ball? Both teams have all timeouts.

3. Eagles have the ball on the one yard line, tie game, two minutes to go. 4th down. Go for the TD or kick the FG?

4. Eagles up 5 with a little over 2 minutes to go. Chiefs have zero timeouts. Eagles have the ball on the +35 yard line. 4th and 1. Go for it to ice the game and risk the miss and Mahomes getting the ball back with great field position to drive for the win. Or kick the FG make it an 8 point game and guarantee OT at worst?

1. Hargrave 

2. Up 

3. TD

4. FG 

1 hour ago, bitbased said:

We also resolved our own "officiating error" on the fumble no call. That error also cost us return yards because they blew the play dead immediately but at least we threw the challenge flag. That's all on Shanahan, not the officials.

That’s a good point. If both plays are called "correctly”, the score after the first quarter is probably 7-0. And that’s exactly what it was.

1 hour ago, Utebird said:

Again that you don't see how condescending your posts are is the problem 

It's not my job to show you how to talk like an adult to others way above my pay grade.

Dude...I mean this in a totally non condescending way....you’re absolutely overreacting to an innocent comment. I read the exchange as a neutral observer and didn’t find anything wrong with what was said. You’re manufacturing anger out of nothing. My mother is very good at that, so I’m an expert in noticing it.

 

 

I feel like this happens to at least one of the teams every Super Bowl.

 

The 49ers could have dressed a third quarterback if they wanted to. The choice was theirs. Players who are upset are misplacing their anger. They shouldn’t be mad at the league rules but rather with their own coaching staff. They were the ones who gambled and put themselves at risk. So F em. 

 

1 minute ago, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

The 49ers could have dressed a third quarterback if they wanted to. The choice was theirs. Players who are upset are misplacing their anger. They shouldn’t be mad at the league rules but rather with their own coaching staff. They were the ones who gambled and put themselves at risk. So F em. 

It seems like more than just bad luck that Shanahan’s QBs are always getting hurt

Just now, FranklinFldEBUpper said:

The 49ers could have dressed a third quarterback if they wanted to. The choice was theirs. Players who are upset are misplacing their anger. They shouldn’t be mad at the league rules but rather with their own coaching staff. They were the ones who gambled and put themselves at risk. So F em. 

You are talking logically to a group of people who are emotionally charged about the end of their season.  Logic won't prevail.  Let them kick for a while.  They will calm down eventually... and if they don't, then after a couple months, hit them with the logic.  Even if they did have another QB on the roster, what good would that have really done them?  They wouldn't have won that game with Johnson, even if he had lasted the game.  

1 hour ago, Iggles_Phan said:

Lane is dinged, Dickerson is dinged, Hurts is dinged, Sanders is dinged, Sweat is dinged, Siposs is dinged... just about everyone on the team is 'dinged' at this point in the season.  The question is how effective can they be despite the dings.  

ding ding ding ding

4 minutes ago, TorontoEagle said:

It seems like more than just bad luck that Shanahan’s QBs are always getting hurt

He learned from his dad

14 minutes ago, schuy7 said:

I feel like this happens to at least one of the teams every Super Bowl.

 

Chris Long was just talking about it the other day and said like half the team in 2017 was sick leading up to the game 

@hputenis

had Indian food for dinner… barely had time to clean up before I usain bolted to the toilet 

52 minutes ago, downundermike said:

False.

You have put me on ignore at least 5 times.

And that is meaningful/significant because?

42 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

 

 

So let me get this straight — this clown thinks a QB who would be WORSE than Josh Johnson would have made a difference in THAT game?

2 minutes ago, Thrive said:

So let me get this straight — this clown thinks a QB who would be WORSE than Josh Johnson would have made a difference in THAT game?

He also wished both teams lost. 

2 minutes ago, Thrive said:

So let me get this straight — this clown thinks a QB who would be WORSE than Josh Johnson would have made a difference in THAT game?

Both the 29ers team and fans are really coming across as butt hurt retards this past week or so.