3 hours ago, brkmsn said:

It sounds like you've switched teams. I hope you find all you're looking for out there.

It sounds like you accept losers. I hope you find what you are looking for as well.

5 hours ago, Talonblood said:

This is "greatness?" Costing your team a Superbowl?

The farts you are smelling are your own, that you smell under your bed covers. 🤣

-------------

Wasn't his fault, guy did everything he could. He basically made a single mistake all game, then drove back down the field to make the differential 0. It was basically the same as if we had the longest SB drive in history and then missed the field goal at the end. Maybe the defense shouldn't have turned in the worst second half performance in Super Bowl history.

 

 

4 minutes ago, AmericanEagle77 said:

Wasn't his fault, guy did everything he could. He basically made a single mistake all game, then drove back down the field to make the differential 0. It was basically the same as if we had the longest SB drive in history and then missed the field goal at the end. Maybe the defense shouldn't have turned in the worst second half performance in Super Bowl history.

 

Oh, got it. You're one of the anti-logic troll types. That's fine then.

6 hours ago, Talonblood said:

This is "greatness?" Costing your team a Superbowl?

The farts you are smelling are your own, that you smell under your bed covers. 🤣

-------------

We were up by 7 when the Fumble TD happened ... we were up by 10 at the Half. At this point the fumble is irrelevant as we established a bigger lead "after" that fumble than we had prior to it happening. We lost because the Defense could not stop KC at all in the 2nd half and the ST's unit gave up a monster Punt return after a horrible punt. If Jalen would have fumbled in the 4th quarter to lose the lead, then I would be in agreement that Jalen's fumble cost us the game, but that wasn't the case.

42 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

 

The imperfection on an otherwise immaculate Super Bowl statline.

 

370 total yards, 4 total TDs, 2 pt conversion, 1 turnover. Arguably the best game of his career

1 hour ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

The imperfection on an otherwise immaculate Super Bowl statline.

 

370 total yards, 4 total TDs, 2 pt conversion, 1 turnover. Arguably the best game of his career

I think part of the problem with people's perception, is that Mahomes had 0 turnovers despite having more on the season, combined with the fact that they got used to Jalen's absurd levels of minimal Turnovers in pretty much every game except the Bears game.

They don't seem to realize that if we had say, Herbert instead of Hurts, that game honestly wouldn't have been all that close.

1 hour ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

The imperfection on an otherwise immaculate Super Bowl statline.

 

370 total yards, 4 total TDs, 2 pt conversion, 1 turnover. Arguably the best game of his career

Where he personally lost the game. THAT is the bottom line- a freakin W or an L. You all are sooooo happy about his L. You guys ain't from Philly. 🤣

1 hour ago, Rey said:

We were up by 7 when the Fumble TD happened ... we were up by 10 at the Half. At this point the fumble is irrelevant as we established a bigger lead "after" that fumble than we had prior to it happening. We lost because the Defense could not stop KC at all in the 2nd half and the ST's unit gave up a monster Punt return after a horrible punt. If Jalen would have fumbled in the 4th quarter to lose the lead, then I would be in agreement that Jalen's fumble cost us the game, but that wasn't the case.

He delivered an L. Period. Losers celebrate L's/ Winner want a W. 

4 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

Where he personally lost the game. THAT is the bottom line- a freakin W or an L. You all are sooooo happy about his L. You guys ain't from Philly. 🤣

Do you believe he solely lost the game?

Fluke fumble in slippery conditions vs this play:

 

25 minutes ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

Do you believe he solely lost the game?

Here the winning score- Eagles 35- 31. You know why they lost. Hurts GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

5 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

Hear the winning score- Eagles 35- 31. You know why they lost. Hurts GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

7/38ths of them he was responsible for, yes. And for us he was responsible for 35/35ths.

Had he not fumbled the ball, but we scored 1 less touchdown, and we lost 31-28, would you feel he had a better game than what actually happened?

5 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

Here the winning score- Eagles 35- 31. You know why they lost. Hurts GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

Here’s the winning score. 35-7. You know why they lost. The defense and special teams GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

Pretty certain Hurts will win a SB. His time will come. The narrative wills it.

 

6 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

Here the winning score- Eagles 35- 31. You know why they lost. Hurts GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

Watkins dropped a TD, Bradberry gets a penalty to end the game, Refs reverse Smith's catch, Siposs line drives a punt and ST allows a 65 yard return, Gannon doesn't adjust his scheme for field conditions, field conditions. It was a bad play but there is plenty of blame to go around. The Eagles made mistakes, cumulatively, and the Chiefs did not. Clearly

1 hour ago, Next_Up said:

Watkins dropped a TD, Bradberry gets a penalty to end the game, Refs reverse Smith's catch, Siposs line drives a punt and ST allows a 65 yard return, Gannon doesn't adjust his scheme for field conditions, field conditions. It was a bad play but there is plenty of blame to go around. The Eagles made mistakes, cumulatively, and the Chiefs did not. Clearly

Clearly clearly

1 hour ago, MillerTime said:

Here’s the winning score. 35-7. You know why they lost. The defense and special teams GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

Clearly you are a dunce and can't do math.

1 hour ago, Aerolithe_Lion said:

7/38ths of them he was responsible for, yes. And for us he was responsible for 35/35ths.

Had he not fumbled the ball, but we scored 1 less touchdown, and we lost 31-28, would you feel he had a better game than what actually happened?

 

4 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

Clearly you are a dunce and can't do math.

Defense and Special teams gave up 31 points. Please elaborate on what is wrong with the math.

10 minutes ago, Talonblood said:

 

Yes, without that

5 hours ago, Talonblood said:

It sounds like you accept losers. I hope you find what you are looking for as well.

Found one!

3 hours ago, Talonblood said:

Here the winning score- Eagles 35- 31. You know why they lost. Hurts GAVE the Chiefs the winning points. Clearly.

Just curious. Who would you prefer over Hurts since he’s such a loser?

Jalen Hurts 14-1

Pat Mahomes 14-3

Josh Allen 13-3

Joe Borrow 12-4

Justin Herbert 10-7

So if Jalen is a "loser” who in the NFL is actually a winner? 

1 hour ago, EazyEaglez said:

Jalen Hurts 14-1

Pat Mahomes 14-3

Josh Allen 13-3

Joe Borrow 12-4

Justin Herbert 10-7

So if Jalen is a "loser” who in the NFL is actually a winner? 

If Carson Wentz, Jaworski, McNabb, or anyone else made that dumb_ass play and cost the Eagles a Super Bowl, they would have been crucified. Not Jalen Hurts. Why is that? I'll never worship YOUR god. 🤣