January 24, 20251 yr 36 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: We tried "higher risk" and Hurts led the league in picks. Why continue down that dead end road? Dead end when..,three games in? You suggest the time to sort everything out was in the PS…which our guys don’t okay in. All these new factors…a few picks…wasn’t completely expected? I sure did. That dead end road…is only a dead end if we didn’t get things where we need them to succeed right now. Now…is exactly why we definitely needed to continue.
January 24, 20251 yr Author 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Exactly my point…you say it’s extremes all genius or idiot. When in fact my exact point was I’m always it’s just not that way most of the time in reality. Some great, good, bad awful all rolled into one. This is life reality. Everything isn’t so nice and neat and great or terrible. Huh?
January 24, 20251 yr 40 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: If you don't win the weekly in season games you don't get to this point. Every week is important Just as important was the exact point I made…been making. So just as important?
January 24, 20251 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Dead end when..,three games in? You suggest the time to sort everything out was in the PS…which our guys don’t okay in. All these new factors…a few picks…wasn’t completely expected? I sure did. That dead end road…is only a dead end if we didn’t get things where we need them to succeed right now. Now…is exactly why we definitely needed to continue. AJ needs to play in pre season? Smitty? Goedert? Lane? Don't you trust them by now?
January 24, 20251 yr 38 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: AH, so the big picture was attained. Excellent, you are starting to get it. What "experiments" do you want to try this week? Ok…discussion went completely backwards if this thought ever crossed your head.
January 24, 20251 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Just as important was the exact point I made…been making. So just as important? Yes, 1 week at a time, Now you get it
January 24, 20251 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Ok…discussion went completely backwards if this thought ever crossed your head. Apparently there is "more" somewhere that we aren't doing. please list what those things are
January 24, 20251 yr Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Ok…discussion went completely backwards if this thought ever crossed your head. After all your previous opinions …not a surprise. Our ultimate big picture goal has absolutely not been accomplished. I’ve examined pained it relentlessly. Not changing my thoughts on that part. Winning the SB is the goal.
January 24, 20251 yr 41 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Exactly why it lowers the risk of actually losing. Could face more bumps while learning…but he’s going to get it done at the end…or die trying. Might not have been as pretty…not sure I’d call them all pretty anyway.
January 24, 20251 yr Author 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: After all your previous opinions …not a surprise. Our ultimate big picture goal has absolutely not been accomplished. I’ve examined pained it relentlessly. Not changing my thoughts on that part. Winning the SB is the goal. So the big picture is almost complete, still you state we need to improve How????? What comes after the SB?
January 24, 20251 yr 41 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: If you have your choice of mediocre RB's then sure,it's about the O line and there is no need to overpay any of them. Now if you want to talk about Bark or Henry,those are not mediocre RB's. That is a whole different conversation but no way do I pay Sanders 4-5 million to be as mediocre as the next guy You stated over and over you flat wouldn’t pay a RB. You can change your opinion now…but you said that…not just once. Tons…repeatedly…but whatever….do what you do…never just acknowledge when you clearly were incorrect.
January 24, 20251 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: You stated over and over you flat wouldn’t pay a RB. You can change your opinion now…but you said that…not just once. Tons…repeatedly…but whatever….do what you do…never just acknowledge when you clearly were incorrect. 51st try. I said I would not OVERPAY which somehow escapes you
January 24, 20251 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: You stated over and over you flat wouldn’t pay a RB. You can change your opinion now…but you said that…not just once. Tons…repeatedly…but whatever….do what you do…never just acknowledge when you clearly were incorrect. If there was no Bark which RB would you pay and how much? You want Sanders back? How much would you pay him?
January 24, 20251 yr Author How much would you pay, say Bucky Irving? Aaron Jones? What are they worth to you?
January 24, 20251 yr 48 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: We tried "higher risk" and Hurts led the league in picks. Why continue down that dead end road? Oh no…not a few picks doing all this new stuff in the first couple of games. Great point of why we should role back developing all these areas in the O for years. God forbid we actually had some interceptions while learning/growing/adapting and mastering the craft. But hey….we got Home field path to the SB. So all we got to do is beat the Commanders. Thought we could have brought more to the table in this matchup. But….totally recognize how the position the team is in is very strong. We aren’t at our best…but …maybe that is good enough. Let’s see.
January 24, 20251 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Oh no…not a few picks doing all this new stuff in the first couple of games. Great point of why we should role back developing all these areas in the O for years. God forbid we actually had some interceptions while learning/growing/adapting and mastering the craft. But hey….we got Home field path to the SB. So all we got to do is beat the Commanders. Thought we could have brought more to the table in this matchup. But….totally recognize how the position the team is in is very strong. We aren’t at our best…but …maybe that is good enough. Let’s see. Best Hurts we will see. Best supporting cast in the league. makes it really easy for Hurts. As joe asked(no answer) of the 4 QB's left where would you place Hurts?
January 24, 20251 yr 48 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Pay Barkley... not just pay the RB. Glad you’re on board now. Your opinion of don’t pay the Rb and pointing out how smart Rosie is being a genus by refusing to pay a RB didn’t age well after this season. Debate on this subject just has to be over. Pay the RB…he’s freaking cheap even doing that.
January 24, 20251 yr 26 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I'm fine being right, because one more game and we go to the SB. The best Hurts we will see is good enough at this point We all know there’s zero chance you’d admit every time you’re wrong
January 24, 20251 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Glad you’re on board now. Your opinion of don’t pay the Rb and pointing out how smart Rosie is being a genus by refusing to pay a RB didn’t age well after this season. Debate on this subject just has to be over. Pay the RB…he’s freaking cheap even doing that. Like Bark is somehow run of the mill like Sanders LMAO
January 24, 20251 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: We all know there’s zero chance you’d admit every time you’re wrong Because I'm not. Hurts is Hurts is Hurts. He is limited to being a game manager. That;s GREAT!!!! We won a SB with Foles doing the same thing
January 24, 20251 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Hurts= Foles It was good enough once so........ let's try it again Except Foles did it with ALOT worse supporting cast
Create an account or sign in to comment