https://talksport.com/nfl/3131354/jay-berwanger-first-nfl-draft-heisman-trophy-philadelphia-eagles/

4 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

LOL Once again I will ask, anyone thinking Alexander will start at CB2 Mon night?

I have no idea

4 minutes ago, EaglesTD123 said:

LOL Once again I will ask, anyone thinking Alexander will start at CB2 Mon night?

Maybe a combo as Fangio decides who to go with going forward. Doesn't matter who starts it matters who sticks. Just like Ham got pissed Gains "started" in 1 game

12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I like Twisted tea myself too. I like Corona but since Rolling Rock is like a rare animal sighting here in NC I have been drinking Modelo(gold). I brought some Land Shark bottles from FL lol

Big Foot vs Rolling Rock. The odds of seeing either are about the same. Really EXCELLENT beer

34 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Maybe a combo as Fangio decides who to go with going forward. Doesn't matter who start it matters to sticks. Just like Ham got pissed Gains "started" in 1 game

I'm calling it.

1 hour ago, EaglesTD123 said:

I'm calling it.

I said maybe and that's FINAL 🤣

6 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I said maybe and that's FINAL 🤣

What's this sh!t? Your playin' it might rain and it might not ha ha

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Too general. We'd need to know which team(s). Every team that has a mediocre QB is hungry for a QB just like every year. Which round 1 picks, pick 5 or pick 30?

Any Round 1 pick in a future year has uncertainty about which pick it will be. We can't know future year win-loss records in advance.

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

What was the trade haul for Hershel....5 firsts? Lol

The Cowboys acquired eight draft picks through the trade, including Minnesota's next three first-round picks and next three second-round picks.

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Who is a QB hungry team? That would feel Hurts is the answer...enough to win without having 5 first round picks to help him?

Ham doesn't use examples and talks in the hypothetical... hypothetical isn't the real world... that's why we are asking for a real scenario.

That is a reasonable question, for which there is no immediately available answer. AI gives a current answer as follows:

Teams with a high need for a quarterback include the New York Jets, Las Vegas Raiders, Cleveland Browns, and New Orleans Saints.

The Pittsburgh Steelers and Arizona Cardinals are also frequently mentioned as potential QB-needy teams. 

Teams frequently mentioned as QB-needy

• New York Jets: Often cited as a top-needy team, especially as their 2026 draft position is projected to be high.

• Las Vegas Raiders: Considered one of the most likely teams to seek a new quarterback.

• Cleveland Browns: In need of a long-term solution, even after drafting quarterbacks.

• New Orleans Saints: Considered the most obvious team needing a quarterback and potentially in a position to draft first overall.

• Pittsburgh Steelers: Frequently mentioned as a team with a quarterback need.

• Arizona Cardinals: Often included on lists of teams that could be looking for a new quarterback. 

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

At 12 I would go LOL

Your answer shows just how much of a Hurts Hater you are.

8 hours ago, EaglesTD123 said:

LOL Once again I will ask, anyone thinking Alexander will start at CB2 Mon night?

Does it matter who starts? Snap counts should be considered more important.

4 hours ago, mattwill said:

That is a reasonable question, for which there is no immediately available answer. AI gives a current answer as follows:

Teams with a high need for a quarterback include the New York Jets, Las Vegas Raiders, Cleveland Browns, and New Orleans Saints.

The Pittsburgh Steelers and Arizona Cardinals are also frequently mentioned as potential QB-needy teams. 

Teams frequently mentioned as QB-needy

• New York Jets: Often cited as a top-needy team, especially as their 2026 draft position is projected to be high.

• Las Vegas Raiders: Considered one of the most likely teams to seek a new quarterback.

• Cleveland Browns: In need of a long-term solution, even after drafting quarterbacks.

• New Orleans Saints: Considered the most obvious team needing a quarterback and potentially in a position to draft first overall.

• Pittsburgh Steelers: Frequently mentioned as a team with a quarterback need.

• Arizona Cardinals: Often included on lists of teams that could be looking for a new quarterback. 

You see any of these teams giving away their next 5 first round picks for a QB that throws 24 times a game?

5 hours ago, mattwill said:

The Cowboys acquired eight draft picks through the trade, including Minnesota's next three first-round picks and next three second-round picks.

There was also no salary cap to worry about then. Plus look at all the players they got. 4 for 1 so it's not like they just gave picks away, so we ask once again what is the scenario for each team you claim is "needy" where they can't use their HIGH PICK in round 1 on a QB? Hurts was a round 2,so they can find them there also, McKee was a round 6 as was Tom Brady. If a team got Hurts,they best have a great O line or he becomes RG3 and if in fact they HAD that great O line I'm sure they could get a rookie QB in any of the 5 following drafts,so it would make no sense to me. So you get Hurts and for 5 years you have to dig through barrels to find weapons for him(assuming they have an O line to start with) That is some heavy lifting. As I said I will take 12 round 1's since it went from3 to 5 quickly,I will hold out for 12,so apparently my 12 Trumps your "undervalued" 5 you hater

5 hours ago, EaglesTD123 said:

What's this sh!t? Your playin' it might rain and it might not ha ha

Maybe 🤣

5 hours ago, mattwill said:

Your answer shows just how much of a Hurts Hater you are.

I don't hate Hurts,but a ream job is a ream job in business

On 11/7/2025 at 10:25 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

Would you rather have Steen or Becton at RG? We are thin at ROT. That right side needs addressed IMO. Toth can be a BU at either G spots

Steen PFF grade at 68 Becton at 75

6 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Steen PFF grade at 68 Becton at 75

Becton got those clear pancake moments though

There was a whole discussion about how opposite our O scheme is versus the Pack O. Kind of almost a feeling of maybe a bit scheme heavy with the Pack versus us having such a weak scheme under Siri

LaFleur and Siri two top young HCs. This is the price it year for LaFleur and Love.

2 hours ago, joemas6 said:

Does it matter who starts? Snap counts should be considered more important.

That's where my thought was. I don't care if Fred Flintstone starts.

On 11/7/2025 at 9:45 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

Depends on if we found a coherent CB2 or not. If we can't put it off another year then CB would seem the logical choice. If we went CB first I like Colton Hood from Tennessee Pick your order CB, Oline, TE, edge in any order. We could actually use a rook RT AND RG. Need that right side going forward. Lane is not going to last forever. I would have NP luring Becton back at RG

The guy we shouldn’t have let go was Isaiah Rodgers. We already had found the guy that proved a quality fit in Fangio D. Picked up Adoore. Traded for Bennett. Traded for Carter. Traded for Jaire. Still very likely an issue.

On 11/7/2025 at 9:03 PM, Crazy Legs said:

Nice find.

I trust our scouting to find OUR style TE late day 2 or thereabouts.

All depends on this class. I admit haven’t weeded through it all yet. But really would consider the big guy I posted the article about in the first. The prevailing thinking is this is a good healthy draft class this year…as opposed to last draft.

On 11/7/2025 at 10:26 PM, joemas6 said:

Almost as unreal as our fan base still talking about him

It’s great to have such a quality option just waiting for us to feel the need to snag him.

On 11/8/2025 at 12:10 AM, GreenbleedinNC said:

What "detailed eval was" this? What did I miss and when did I miss it? Joe and I were doing evals every season(nearly weekly) and called "haters" because we pointed out Hurts screw ups. The fact we both pointed out what needed fixed and the fact they were fixed and Hurts finally got things together and matured and stopped the bonehead plays last year, proves that we were both right all along. No "he carries the other 52" , no "he is a god that does no wrong" ,no "he sucks because of bad coaching", neither of us would lower our bar to make excuses, we both held firm in what we needed to see. And there were 2 constants in all this 1) the best surrounding cast a QB could ask for 2) Siri. Not in SPITE of Siri, not in SPITE of the best surrounding cast. I'm glad Hurts progressed to the point Joe and I held firm on and now we have a complete QB (still a weaker arm relatively but he excels in other areas). Posting an article from others is YOUR "detailed eval"? LMAO. Joe and I didn't need articles from others. Nice job Joe, glad you held your bar as high as I did. 2 things remain going forward, and they are both the same 2 things. I have no real demands or complaints of Hurts now, he is an excellent QB. As far as Patullo, he started slow, but I suspect he had his reasons. No one wants to tank a SB team into an abyss, thus the rather mundane play calls. Patullo now seems to understand he needs to keep all facets of the offensive play makers involved. he went from conservative to a bit too pass happy, but he will nail down the happy medium we need. Right now, I have no reason to "evaluate" Hurts. Just keep doing what you are doing because there is not much to evaluate. He will keep fine tuning whatever he chooses to work on. I didn't know your name was Jonny Page before or that you posted for the Eagles as I see that underlined.

Yeah you both were really correct on Hurts isn’t a starting QB. No MAs nailed his call of Hurts would never win a SB. You both dogged Hurts for not throwing over the middle…blaming him when it clearly was the flaw Rosie couldn’t get right. Moore got Hurts throwing over the middle some…just by moving Smitty in the Slot some. Amazing how production tends to follow decent productive players…that can actually catch. So surprising with WR known as blockers in the slot production wasn’t off the charts, not!