April 24, 20242 yr 3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Ham says it's a bad comparison. Must be because I am uneducated about the TE position having played it lol I mean the question is have is Bowers that caliber of inline TE that Gronk was? Receiving obviously Bowers could be in the mix with the best I believe. But with a guy like Gronk that gets overlooked is the dirty work he did for the Pats dude was just a dominate blocker.
April 24, 20242 yr And the inline work for TE is tending to fall to the way side with guys wanting to basically be big WRs at the TE spot
April 24, 20242 yr Author 32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: Bowers is 6’2”….Gronk was much taller at 6’6”. Throw it up high to him even if covered. Just a bad comparison in so many ways. Bowers will be a good player is about the only comparison. https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-why-brock-bowers-is-the-greatest-tight-end-in-college-football-history Argue with PFF then
April 24, 20242 yr Bears are making a huge change up. Great looking new stadium. Dome in Chicago for Caleb.
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said: And the inline work for TE is tending to fall to the way side with guys wanting to basically be big WRs at the TE spot Yeah,so quicker can be better than BIG now. We're also seeing TE sized slot WR's
April 24, 20242 yr 15 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: And???? Height makes the player good? Just like speed? More uneducated guesses Makes him not Gronk
April 24, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: I mean the question is have is Bowers that caliber of inline TE that Gronk was? Receiving obviously Bowers could be in the mix with the best I believe. But with a guy like Gronk that gets overlooked is the dirty work he did for the Pats dude was just a dominate blocker. Like Pitts was that draft. But I don't think they use him correctly,so whatever
April 24, 20242 yr 14 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Everyone will be linked tp us for the next 30 hours. Happens every year Latham is linked to us in so many educated guessing ways. He fits and makes a ton of sense.
April 24, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Makes him not Gronk No one is Gronk,No one is Bowers SO????
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Latham is linked to us in so many educated guessing ways. He fits and makes a ton of sense. Any OT for us is a pretty good guess
April 24, 20242 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Like Pitts was that draft. But I don't think they use him correctly,so whatever Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs. But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE
April 24, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs. But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE From what I hear he is a aslo at least an adequate blocker.So he could be a decoy or an actual pass catcher on whatever play. Need to see how the new OC wants this offense to look
April 24, 20242 yr Author 2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs. But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE Yeah Celek/Ertz, Ertz,Geodert,maybe Goedert/Bowers is the next progression IDK. But as joe said the jets would need alot to let him go at 10
April 24, 20242 yr 4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: No one is Gronk,No one is Bowers SO???? You are the one that made the comparison…which doesn’t apply
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: Yeah Celek/Ertz, Ertz,Geodert,maybe Goedert/Bowers is the next progression IDK. But as joe said the jets would need alot to let him go at 10 So rumors are just rumors. We should be used to them by now
April 24, 20242 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: So rumors are just rumors. We should be used to them by now Only a day until the draft not much us to talk about but to speculate on the rumors until we can’t anymore lol
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: So rumors are just rumors. We should be used to them by now Just now, cunninghamtheman said: You are the one that made the comparison…which doesn’t apply Maybe he gets more TD's,more yards,more rings. How do you know he doesn't compare?
April 24, 20242 yr 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Any OT for us is a pretty good guess Any T around our draft spot is very much a good guess, yes
April 24, 20242 yr Author 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: You are the one that made the comparison…which doesn’t apply The guy who picked Reagor over JJ calls me uneducated LMFAO comical
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Any T around our draft spot is very much a good guess, yes So link each one and start a rumor LOL. Doesn't matter until we walk the pick to the podium
April 24, 20242 yr Author 3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: You are the one that made the comparison…which doesn’t apply His IMPACT would be similar which DOES APPLY
April 24, 20242 yr 6 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs. But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE Great points all in here. Plus Moore has been on record not wishing to roll with two TE sets nearly as much as we have been. Looking for three WR sets.
April 24, 20242 yr Author Repeating once again that Smith has been working hard,gaining muscle and weight. He will be even better. Looking forward to see a new offense that uses it's assets
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, cunninghamtheman said: Great points all in here. Plus Moore has been on record not wishing to roll with two TE sets nearly as much as we have been. Looking for three WR sets. When have we had 2 TE sets without TE2??? Everyone knew Stoll was in to block. noone else ever showed up to win the TE2 job
April 24, 20242 yr Author Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: When have we had 2 TE sets without TE2??? Everyone knew Stoll was in to block. noone else ever showed up to win the TE2 job So how can you run plays with players you don't have?
Create an account or sign in to comment