3 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Bowers is 6’2”

He is 6’3 but yes he is definitely nothing like Gronk two completely different TE.

Seen measurements that he is almost identical to Laporta with the lions 

22 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Alabama OT JC Latham to us popping up all of a sudden

I mean fits the Eagles draft philosophy plus should give us an immediate starter at RG 

30 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Alabama OT JC Latham to us popping up all of a sudden

One of the main guys I’ve been highlighting as I suspect we pick.

Lions re-sign Sewell. They now have the highest paid OT AND WR in the league

18 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Bowers is 6’2”….Gronk was much taller at 6’6”. Throw it up high to him even if covered. Just a bad comparison in so many ways. Bowers will be a good player is about the only comparison.

And???? Height makes the player good? Just like speed? More uneducated guesses

35 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Alabama OT JC Latham to us popping up all of a sudden

Everyone will be linked tp us for the next 30 hours. Happens every year

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

One of the main guys I’ve been highlighting as I suspect we pick.

Yes you highlighted everyone in the top 25,well done

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

And???? Height makes the player good? Just like speed? More uneducated guesses

I mean he said Bowers was going to be good but there is obvious differences between a guy that was 6’6 270 what he can do v a guy that 6’3 240.

Can both be great but are going to do it differently. Just like Tyreke is great and AJ is great but win in different ways 

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean he said Bowers was going to be good but there is obvious differences between a guy that was 6’6 270 what he can do v a guy that 6’3 240.

Can both be great but are going to do it differently. Just like Tyreke is great and AJ is great but win in different ways 

IDK more than 1 called Bowers "a generational talent at TE",so I mean he's not just your average TE

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean he said Bowers was going to be good but there is obvious differences between a guy that was 6’6 270 what he can do v a guy that 6’3 240.

Can both be great but are going to do it differently. Just like Tyreke is great and AJ is great but win in different ways 

Ham says it's a bad comparison. Must be because I am uneducated about the TE position having played it lol

At any rate unless the deal is really excellent,I don't see us moving until the clock starts. It could be a pre-arranged thing,but even if it is, we can hold that hostage for a better deal. I'm sure Howie understands what other teams need that pick before us

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Ham says it's a bad comparison. Must be because I am uneducated about the TE position having played it lol

I mean the question is have is Bowers that caliber of inline TE that Gronk was? Receiving obviously Bowers could be in the mix with the best I believe.

But with a guy like Gronk that gets overlooked is the dirty work he did for the Pats dude was just a dominate blocker. 

And the inline work for TE is tending to fall to the way side with guys wanting to basically be big WRs at the TE spot 

32 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Bowers is 6’2”….Gronk was much taller at 6’6”. Throw it up high to him even if covered. Just a bad comparison in so many ways. Bowers will be a good player is about the only comparison.

https://www.pff.com/news/college-football-why-brock-bowers-is-the-greatest-tight-end-in-college-football-history  Argue with PFF then

Bears are making a huge change up. Great looking new stadium. Dome in Chicago for Caleb.

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

And the inline work for TE is tending to fall to the way side with guys wanting to basically be big WRs at the TE spot 

Yeah,so quicker can be better than BIG now. We're also seeing TE sized slot WR's

15 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

And???? Height makes the player good? Just like speed? More uneducated guesses

Makes him not Gronk

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I mean the question is have is Bowers that caliber of inline TE that Gronk was? Receiving obviously Bowers could be in the mix with the best I believe.

But with a guy like Gronk that gets overlooked is the dirty work he did for the Pats dude was just a dominate blocker. 

Like Pitts was that draft. But I don't think they use him correctly,so whatever

14 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Everyone will be linked tp us for the next 30 hours. Happens every year

Latham is linked to us in so many educated guessing ways. He fits and makes a ton of sense.

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Makes him not Gronk

No one is Gronk,No one is Bowers SO????

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Latham is linked to us in so many educated guessing ways. He fits and makes a ton of sense.

Any OT for us is a pretty good guess

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Like Pitts was that draft. But I don't think they use him correctly,so whatever

Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs.

But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE 

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs.

But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE 

From what I hear he is a aslo at least an adequate blocker.So he could be a decoy or an actual pass catcher on whatever play. Need to see how the new OC wants this offense to look

2 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Look nothing wrong with the receiving TE but like you said have to use him correctly which is why Bowers could fit as the pick could flex him out wide as the slot WR in those kind of sets…. Likely to big for most slot CB and S and to fast for most LBs.

But similar to Ertz you need the other guy as well Ertz was lucky we had Celek great blocker then Geodart another really good inline TE 

Yeah Celek/Ertz, Ertz,Geodert,maybe Goedert/Bowers is the next progression IDK. But as joe said the jets would need alot to let him go at 10

4 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

No one is Gronk,No one is Bowers SO????

You are the one that made the comparison…which doesn’t apply