1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Chargers understood hiring Moore meant less conservative two TE sets

Who were their TE's?

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I have 2 WR's so I'm going to run 3 WR sets,because you know I will just make that happen(this is stupidity regardless of your education. My 7 year old grand son would know better). What's uneducated is calling other people uneducated because this is hypocritical. So please tell me what me education level is and what degrees I hold. I'd like to hear this since you must know it

Don’t even remember calling you uneducated. What did I say again you’re referring to?

52 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

2022 Chargers had 1240 snaps in 12 personnel

2023 Chargers had 1060 snaps in 12 personnel 

IDK I didn't look it up,who were their TE's in said years?

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK I didn't look it up,who were their TE's in said years?

Think I maybe wasn’t using the website correctly for these figures. So I’d ignore this post. I probably was wrong on these numbers.

30 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Also have to add the fact that the most heavy use 12 personnel team was the Falcons and that was just under 42% of the snaps no other team even cracked 40% 

Well they did draft Pitts high,so it would be no surprise they tried to utilize him

But doesn’t change the perception surrounding Moore. I’ll admit and acknowledge BG possibly made good points on this subject about Moore utilizing 12 personnel.

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well they did draft Pitts high,so it would be no surprise they tried to utilize him

What a waste of such talent

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Think I maybe wasn’t using the website correctly for these figures. So I’d ignore this post. I probably was wrong on these numbers.

Well,.IDK hard to know. Maybe they lost or traded a TE. I don't follow every team from year to year. Maybe they added a decent RB or  a top WR so they ran more or went with 3 sets more. All this stuff varies by year and who the additions or subtractions were and whatever coaching changes were made

44 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Exactly. Why there is no way I ever suggested trading back for just Reagor.

Completely false news repeated over..and over…and over..and over again by one certain poster here.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Well,.IDK hard to know. Maybe they lost or traded a TE. I don't follow every team from year to year. Maybe they added a decent RB or  a top WR so they ran more or went with 3 sets more. All this stuff varies by year and who the additions or subtractions were and whatever coaching changes were made

This is a valid point

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

This is a valid point

Believe it applies to a point BG was making also.

How the draft unfolds should provide some answers of what our new coaches are thinking. Then we can make guesses,right or wrong, as to what they want to implement.

On 4/22/2024 at 4:20 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

But should Hurts leadership had him speak up even louder to force a change and get his life long family friend fired as OC? Probably. Seems clear he was complaining recognizing the issues. Pointing out how 10-1 team has serious problems and issues his competitive will forced…. masking those issues up to that point. Uneducated fans like FL just point to how he pulled out victories and we were 10-1. Power Ranking clickbait everywhere labeling us number 1 NFL team after 11 weeks. Hurts saw how false this was. I don’t think he was even alone. Rumors were leaking from complaints inside the locker room. The predictability of the O playcalling being the chief repeated leaked locker room complaint.

Remember now????

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Remember now????

Ok thanks. So if you wish to tout how I’m wrong verifying your extended football educational background now would be the time.

My first wife owns a law firm…but she’s a moron talking about football. 

7 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok thanks. So if you wish to tout how I’m wrong verifying your extended football educational background now would be the time.

Clearly wasn’t remembering saying that today. So yeah…don’t remember each and every word used days ago. Thanks for reposting  so I could remember and understand what you are referring to here.

Crazy good program LSU is…and at pumping out WRs. They had JaMarr Chase and Justin Jefferson…now Nabors and Thomas. Just beast pass catchers…and playing side by side. Was the main reason I wasn’t super high on Jefferson. Always saw Chase as the better weapon. That and had doubts Jefferson was anything other than a slot WR. Kind of thinking now maybe Thomas slides like Jefferson did…being overshadowed.

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Well but then I actually dug up a small nugget of how the change was coming to LA with hiring Moore. 12 personnel was on the outs for them with him preferring 11 personnel. Guess the proof is in the pudding and we’ll see. I’m operating under the belief our O prefers 11 personnel now and will utilize motion.

That's what I've read and posted, lots more motion, vertical passing and less predictability

Daniel Jeremiah's changed his mock from CB to OT by the teams Eagles are calling;

https://www.nbcsportsphiladelphia.com/nfl/philadelphia-eagles/nfl-network-daniel-jeremiah-changed-mind-eagles-2024-draft-target/580670/

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m not real high on Moore and Siri though. I’d rebuild more on the D side of things. Fangio I see as a much higher chance of remaining here for awhile.

This crap hits the fan in Philly the entire staff will be gone. Unless they hand the job to Fangio to be the next HC and I’d pass.

Not going to attract many guys if you forcing staff on them. We already seen that outcome with Doug 

If we end up sucking are back in a position in 2 years to need another QB hopefully we suck enough that we are in the running for Arch Manning lmao. 
 

This is all just jokes and fun though I do think Arch Manning will likely be a very good QB in the NFL having a grandfather and two uncles to help guide him 

46 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Daniel Jeremiah's changed his mock from CB to OT by the teams Eagles are calling;

Can make the case the only round 1 pick that would start day 1 and play every snap is an OL at presumably RG.

Edge would be in rotation 

TE is the backup to Geodart 

WR is the 3rd guy at best 

DB- lots of guys ahead of him Bradbury/ Slay/ Maddox/ Gardner etc. 

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Be most welcome to bring in an O that defensive don’t find completely predictable. Sure felt Hurts thrived much more under Steichen.

If the league is figuring out RPO....that's not good for Hurts. 

2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

I’m not real high on Moore and Siri though. I’d rebuild more on the D side of things. Fangio I see as a much higher chance of remaining here for awhile.

So the QB won't perform and the coach and OC will take the blame?

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

My first wife owns a law firm…but she’s a moron talking about football. 

Hmmm....like people who know college ball...yet not much when it comes to contracts?