15 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Not false, as I clearly showed below. The facts don’t lie.

You can’t follow along. You’re doing great at quoting me. Well done. What you’d have to do is quote me saying what FL BS created under supposedly quoting me. Which you can’t possibly do. But keep trying….maybe you’ll get there…well no no no you won’t!

Anybody find an actual post with me saying all that FL quoted me saying yet? Anybody? Anybody? Bueller?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

How do you explain the post I quoted directly before this where that’s exactly what I did originally then?

Very easy to explain. You clearly didn’t

/don’t understand where his response to you starts and your post that he quoted ends. Reading is fundamental. His response was:

On 12/16/2025 at 8:36 PM, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/gamelog/_/id/4685201/tanner-mckee 3/3 passes, just HEROIC LOL. See how useless that stat can be? Like McKee but I still understand 3/3 isn't heroic LOL

14. Does passer rating double count completion percentage?

Yes, passer rating arguably double-counts completion percentage by favoring quarterbacks who tend to throw short passes, regardless of the effectiveness of those passes.

Your question he was responding to was:

On 12/16/2025 at 3:06 PM, cunninghamtheman said:

Stat padding? he came out of the game and padded McKee’s trade value stats

"I think a lot of it has to do with the communication and just jelling through things,” said the OC.

6 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

So you can’t pull up my quote only that says all that FL created under supposedly him quoting me. Thank you…exactly. Total made up crap added under supposedly quoting me.

Those voices.......on the board......are they in the room with us right now?

Yikes

updated playoff scenario

11 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Nope…not it. Try again…but much harder(er)

Dude. You understand how dumb you sound?

10 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You can’t follow along. You’re doing great at quoting me. Well done. What you’d have to do is quote me saying what FL BS created under supposedly quoting me. Which you can’t possibly do. But keep trying….maybe you’ll get there…well no no no you won’t!

So why don't you state exactly what you are talking about. Because to the rest of the world you look like an idiot every time Matt posts the quote you keep denying.

Say EXACTLY what " this extra BS" is.

Until you do that, you sound like a 4 year old with chocolate all over his face denying that he ate the chocolate cake!

Your communication skills blow! Matt backed up his point with the quotes... you now have to show what you mean. Until you do , you sound like the idiot, not anyone else.

If you don't want to be part of the discussion as an equal, why are you even here?

And then this same crap takes 6 pages ...just end the conversation by showing exactly what the mis quote was.

F@lk you are frustrating human being ...condolences to your family and any possible acquaintances.

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

updated playoff scenario

I think a real conversation needs to be had after this weekend regarding resting some guys if the results basically lock us into the #3 seed.

For me, Lane and Carter would be out until playoffs. Dickerson and Cam rest. I'm getting in work for some backup D players.

The issue is the Buffalo game on their turf in the cold. We know the last game will be backups but what about Buffalo. Does the league frown on that, possibly giving Buffalo an easy win?

Idk...but I'm fine resting guys it the right scenario plays out this weekend. #2 seed doesn't really matter as much as going in healthy

3 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I think a real conversation needs to be had after this weekend regarding resting some guys if the results basically lock us into the #3 seed.

For me, Lane and Carter would be out until playoffs. Dickerson and Cam rest. I'm getting in work for some backup D players.

The issue is the Buffalo game on their turf in the cold. We know the last game will be backups but what about Buffalo. Does the league frown on that, possibly giving Buffalo an easy win?

Idk...but I'm fine resting guys it the right scenario plays out this weekend. #2 seed doesn't really matter as much as going in healthy

Yeah, this is just "as of now". Not locked yet. I'm with you. If we can knock out some early scores and add one after the 1/2 I also see the 2's coming in, maybe even some 3's getting a few snaps. Sam Howell is a good QB, Ship needs some snaps and you are right, those O line guys need to heal up. Losing to Buffalo could gain us some draft spots and wouldn't hurt since they are in the other division and I really can't see them coming through to the SB. Last night was a great game. We will have to beat the winner as I believe they will play each other again. Both the Hawks and the Rams are crankin right now. Our O still is not impressive as of late. We will need the best O line we can muster because we need to keep Bark going strong if we want any chance at going back to the SB.. Last night both teams were over 31 PPG and that was vs the best 2 teams as opposed to us doing well against the bottom dwellers. We can't let the wuss be head hinters in game 1(injuring our guys on cheap shots),so the less they play, the better. Suffice to say we have out work cut out if we want to repeat

Looks like Cam Williams will be available as a BU T. Came off IR last week and is practicing. I just told you everything I know about him HAHA

38 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah, this is just "as of now". Not locked yet. I'm with you. If we can knock out some early scores and add one after the 1/2 I also see the 2's coming in, maybe even some 3's getting a few snaps. Sam Howell is a good QB, Ship needs some snaps and you are right, those O line guys need to heal up. Losing to Buffalo could gain us some draft spots and wouldn't hurt since they are in the other division and I really can't see them coming through to the SB. Last night was a great game. We will have to beat the winner as I believe they will play each other again. Both the Hawks and the Rams are crankin right now. Our O still is not impressive as of late. We will need the best O line we can muster because we need to keep Bark going strong if we want any chance at going back to the SB.. Last night both teams were over 31 PPG and that was vs the best 2 teams as opposed to us doing well against the bottom dwellers. We can't let the wuss be head hinters in game 1(injuring our guys on cheap shots),so the less they play, the better. Suffice to say we have out work cut out if we want to repeat

I'm not looking at rest this week... the last 2 games where guys don't have to even dress is my idea

42 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Yeah, this is just "as of now". Not locked yet. I'm with you. If we can knock out some early scores and add one after the 1/2 I also see the 2's coming in, maybe even some 3's getting a few snaps. Sam Howell is a good QB, Ship needs some snaps and you are right, those O line guys need to heal up. Losing to Buffalo could gain us some draft spots and wouldn't hurt since they are in the other division and I really can't see them coming through to the SB. Last night was a great game. We will have to beat the winner as I believe they will play each other again. Both the Hawks and the Rams are crankin right now. Our O still is not impressive as of late. We will need the best O line we can muster because we need to keep Bark going strong if we want any chance at going back to the SB.. Last night both teams were over 31 PPG and that was vs the best 2 teams as opposed to us doing well against the bottom dwellers. We can't let the wuss be head hinters in game 1(injuring our guys on cheap shots),so the less they play, the better. Suffice to say we have out work cut out if we want to repeat

I just thought of this. You guys are all about college and amateur football. Other than a few times watching family or friends kids play or when Kyle Pitts was taking my school to the state championship games... I don't really watch amateur football.

Probably why you come up with... " let's get in the backups " etc... you have experience with games that are so one sided ( to me why I don't like amateur football, it seems half the games are like this) that you see the score being so lopsided that the backups can get in.

I don't see football that way. Not a common occurrence in the NFL regardless of how lopsided the matchup is.

So my idea....we beat Washington, not necessarily 50-0 at half. But where our guys play a regular game.

Then some guys just don't even dress the final 2 weeks. Rest up completely...not practice all week and dress and play a half. To me that's not rest. Rest is not practicing and not dressing. Playing zero snaps or reps during the week, so your body can heal.

Washington we play for real. We win the game ...very key. Don't take the foot off the gas. No ( get up by 30 at half and after the marching band is done, the backups go in)

Win, see the results of the weekend, and think about not playing guys and giving them Rest the last two weeks. Not less snaps this week

12 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

"I think a lot of it has to do with the communication and just jelling through things,” said the OC.

Just curious, what happened in the OT game last night? Seemed like the team that took the ball 2nd then had the opportunity to make a decision to win the game. And wow, they won! I'm sure you can spin it to where you are correct and the rest of the world is wrong though. That seems to be your talent.

Just now, capmaster24 said:

Just curious, what happened in the OT game last night? Seemed like the team that took the ball 2nd then had the opportunity to make a decision to win the game. And wow, they won! I'm sure you can spin it to where you are correct and the rest of the world is wrong though. That seems to be your talent.

We held Gibbs to just 107 receiving yards... that was the " most important thing" in that game. Pure genius!

Jordan Davis biggest value is babysitting Carter. Boy that worked out as a great take this year, Carter spitting on people and missing time. Meanwhile how has Davis played?

Pure genius takes all over the place

7 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

We held Gibbs to just 107 receiving yards... that was the " most important thing" in that game. Pure genius!

Jordan Davis biggest value is babysitting Carter. Boy that worked out as a great take this year, Carter spitting on people and missing time. Meanwhile how has Davis played?

Pure genius takes all over the place

Just curious since I'm a draft guy to how you think that goes. I believe CB2 and O line are the 2 biggest needs. As you know I'm a proponent of round 1 guys stating right away, so IMO that would put CB2 in round 1 and O line in round 2. I could see it reversed if we want to lock in the RG because we seriously need to get Bark back to doing the damage we know he can. Will be interesting to see what Howie does to set up the '26 team for success.

51 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just curious since I'm a draft guy to how you think that goes. I believe CB2 and O line are the 2 biggest needs. As you know I'm a proponent of round 1 guys stating right away, so IMO that would put CB2 in round 1 and O line in round 2. I could see it reversed if we want to lock in the RG because we seriously need to get Bark back to doing the damage we know he can. Will be interesting to see what Howie does to set up the '26 team for success.

BPA

52 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just curious since I'm a draft guy to how you think that goes. I believe CB2 and O line are the 2 biggest needs. As you know I'm a proponent of round 1 guys stating right away, so IMO that would put CB2 in round 1 and O line in round 2. I could see it reversed if we want to lock in the RG because we seriously need to get Bark back to doing the damage we know he can. Will be interesting to see what Howie does to set up the '26 team for success.

The best player always has the biggest impact for his career. To me you draft for the career potential... not year 1 need.

6 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

updated playoff scenario

I like it … a lot.

3 hours ago, joemas6 said:

So why don't you state exactly what you are talking about. Because to the rest of the world you look like an idiot every time Matt posts the quote you keep denying.

Say EXACTLY what " this extra BS" is.

Until you do that, you sound like a 4 year old with chocolate all over his face denying that he ate the chocolate cake!

Your communication skills blow! Matt backed up his point with the quotes... you now have to show what you mean. Until you do , you sound like the idiot, not anyone else.

If you don't want to be part of the discussion as an equal, why are you even here?

His stupidity and obtuseness is of epic proportions. I finally understood what he was referring to , where the EMB software embedded the text of GB’s response inside the quote box rather than outside it. Ham doesn’t know the difference between a person’s words and a software glitch. That glitch happens quite regularly when you are bringing over a link/embedded article and then add your own words.

Ham was just having a Forrest Gump or Gomer Pyle moment.

53 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Just curious since I'm a draft guy to how you think that goes. I believe CB2 and O line are the 2 biggest needs. As you know I'm a proponent of round 1 guys stating right away, so IMO that would put CB2 in round 1 and O line in round 2. I could see it reversed if we want to lock in the RG because we seriously need to get Bark back to doing the damage we know he can. Will be interesting to see what Howie does to set up the '26 team for success.

Give you an example.. take Jordan Davis. And Kyle Hamilton.

Ham loves secondary players...the flash, doesn't care about the guys doing the dirty work ( unless it's Howie trading Booker)

You tell me.... what would the reason be to take Jordan Davis over Kyle Hamilton? Clearly Hamilton has more hype probably seen as the better individual player.

But tell me who has had more impact? How has the Eagles run defense been with Davis? Then how has that impacted the defense as a whole?

How has the Ravens D been since Hamilton haa been there? How has his play impacted the team?

This you have to ask yourself before making a draft choice. This is where the prioritization of position comes into play.

It becomes part of the equation. Which player will have the most impact on the Eagles over his career?

You may look at last year thinking they filled needs with Q and DeJean.. but I can look at it as the players they had as making the most impact.

BPA...not the # grades you draft geeks look at....BPA to me is the organization saying this is the best player available that will have the most impact on the game for our team.

1 minute ago, mattwill said:

His stupidity and obtuseness is of epic proportions. I finally understood what he was referring to , where the EMB software embedded the text of GB’s response inside the quote box rather than outside it. Ham doesn’t know the difference between a person’s words and a software glitch. That glitch happens quite regularly when you are bringing over a link/embedded article and then add your own words.

Ham was just having a Forrest Gump or Gomer Pyle moment.

Nah...he just refuses to take 2 seconds to explain...he would rather waste 6 pages with " see" and say nothing.