I mean there is the thought of not playing Keegan because he’s a LG and just solely looking at only RG options. Just choose whomever is the best RG to add in. 
  But there also can be a thought of if our best five Oline for team needs sake could dictate moving Dickerson to RG because if our best five man unit would consist of that with another player at LG.

15 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I would if it were anyone else....but your  arrogance and ignorance over the years when we ask you to give a simple and direct answer ... you do your own research..

 

You never do…just answer my questions hardly ever. But yet label me as the one avoiding answering your questions. Funny part is I answer your questions…so much of the time. Just not the answers you always are looking for.

But to state it very clearly for the record once again…I never said Keegan couldn’t play RG

Heck don’t really know if Keegan is our next best OLine solution to begin with either.

11 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You had no problem with not playing our best CB outside because of team need and putting the best starting lineup out there. So I just asked if that also applies the same to our Oline.

Who is our best outside CB?  At the NFL level?

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Heck don’t really know if Keegan is our next best OLine solution to begin with either.

Right... then if he isn't..then he can't play LG either. Certainly not to move the best in the league..and split up the left side.   

Just ridiculous 

4 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

You never do…just answer my questions hardly ever. But yet label me as the one avoiding answering your questions. Funny part is I answer your questions…so much of the time. Just not the answers you always are looking for.

Answer every direct and simple question.  I gave you the OL in the playoffs...told you preseason games are meaningless for starters.  I always answer your direct questions.  

The left field bullspit... not worth the time. 

12 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Answer every direct and simple question.  I gave you the OL in the playoffs...told you preseason games are meaningless for starters.  I always answer your direct questions.  

The left field bullspit... not worth the time. 

That’s fine. I found it as an interesting very plausible crucial team situation and scenario. Everything occurring kind of leads to potentially exactly what I’m talking about. But I wasn’t trying to make any definitive statements about everybody. Just wondered what everybodies solution would be in this scenario. You avoided answering…which is absolutely your right. But to be clear…you avoided answering.

24 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Who is our best outside CB?  At the NFL level?

Q

56 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Keegan will play RG.   Stop acting like he could play LG in the NFL..to where you move the best in the league..but can't play RG at all.    Just ridiculous 

Not ridiculous at all. Not every player can swing. Ridiculous is assuming every player can. But I didn’t say he absolutely couldn’t. I just posed a possibly real question of what would you do if he couldn’t play RG very well. But could play LG well.

1 hour ago, joemas6 said:

My thoughts....the playoffs will have Mailata, Dickerson,  Jurgens, Keegan and Lane as the OL.

No idea what we’ll have for the playoffs. Sure hope Lane can suit up

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Yes everybody is just a good player or they aren’t. None have areas they accel in more or deficient areas of weakness…of course. Just DeVonta Smiths or Quez Watkins players…nothing else. All CBs are good at Man and Zone equally also. All LBs are good versus the run and pass equally. Everything is just generic fitting nice and neat into job title on a depth chart. If you are labeled WR that means you are fast, great your runner, great catching passes, great blocker, great running with the ball in your hands, can play inside or outside…..every labeled WR all are exactly the same…except some are good and some are bad. That seems exactly like what I’ve noticed all these games I’ve seen. Everybody is the exactly the same according to job titles on a depth chart.

So now you admit it's because one player is better than another and not because they are specialists. Well done

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No such thing as a run stuffing specialist on D anywhere. Can’t possibly exist if it isn’t labeled somewhere in a depth chart you browsed.

Because he has more talent????? No that can't be it,he needs to be a specialist. Only a specialist can do it

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

No such thing as a RB that specializes in pass catching either. That position doesn’t exist on the depth chart. Just good or bad RBs according to your logic FL.

Because he has more talent? No can't be it. There aren't good and bad RB's? Bark is the same as Sanders? Why are they in need of a "specialist" label? Can't they just excel because they have talent?

You can't enjoy being a fan because you are too busy overthinking labels and putting players in pigeon holes. Why I love versatile guys who can't be put in a box

https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/_/id/3126035/max-scharping  Whip(WIP?) this guy into shape. Eggs mentioned him and I forgot all about him

• Guard Max Scharping held off pass rusher Bryce Huff on the edge.    One training camp observation. Playing T? was he? IDK

https://thebruinsblog.net/5-2-defense-in-football/ Just sayin....... could be a nice change up

2 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

https://thebruinsblog.net/5-2-defense-in-football/ Just sayin....... could be a nice change up

GB, made 6 cuts to my dynasty squad... Washington D, Brandon McManus, James Robinson, Noah Fant, Xavier Hutchinson ( WR Hou) and Sean Tucker ( TB RB)

So i will draft 6 new guys.  My cousin's son likes this kicker Detroit drafted, so I'm going to target him with one of the picks to go with McPherson as my two kickers.  Two young studs and forget about that position for a while. That's probably not until pick 30.    

At pick 10 it looks like the Washington QB or the WR from the Chargers will be the best value. All a crapshoot with the rookies.

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

You can't enjoy being a fan because you are too busy overthinking labels and putting players in pigeon holes. Why I love versatile guys who can't be put in a box

You are the one caught up on labels. I just believe in coaches utilizing whatever skills and talents their players have….bringing in players with talents the team is missing.

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

• Guard Max Scharping held off pass rusher Bryce Huff on the edge.    One training camp observation. Playing T? was he? IDK

Yes he got destroyed playing LT

3 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Because he has more talent????? No that can't be it,he needs to be a specialist. Only a specialist can do it

It’s about what talents do each player individually possess. What can they bring to the table…and how can a coach utilize each skill that player has. All WR aren’t the same. Some are physical. Some are fast. Some excellent route runners. Just so many details involved. But the plays I’m talking about needing to be added we need plays that can create with the ball in their hands. That’s what our FO clearly made efforts to target. Brought in several of these potential options. On a team that didn’t have many.

What are you looking for on a one or two(or negative) yard pass play designed to open up space or perhaps blocking? Its completely designed based on YAC Creation. You aren’t just looking for one yard. You are getting things cleared out and creating room scheming things so that player can make something happen afterwards. 

Cowboys rumored to be looking to trade for Miles Sanders

1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Cowboys rumored to be looking to trade for Miles Sanders

That's good for us lol