Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Evidently I need to post the link of how the players came together to confront Siri on how the O has to get better? But I wouldn’t want you to consider any alternatives to Hurts Hating when they were groping last season also. At least Siri’s incompetence gave us the positive of our team won’t just gripe and put up with it. They learned they must be proactively showing unity to confront the coach demanding more.

Sure post the link

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

Sure post the link

The O should be better because Hurts should be better.It's year 5 now

36 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Nah, but success usually follows the stats. if you aren't putting up the stats,you aren't winning much and while you get those weird games at times,it holds fairly true

Ok so explain to me how 110 degree Bowles coached away game missing so many key players should be used to measure anything about who our team is? 
 

2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

confront the coach demanding more.

SO the coach should not demand more?

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok so explain to me how 110 degree Bowles coached away game missing so many key players should be used to measure anything about who our team is? 
 

Post the damn link

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Ok so explain to me how 110 degree Bowles coached away game missing so many key players should be used to measure anything about who our team is? 
 

You try? Because you are paid professionals?

It was the heat, it was Bowles,it was toe jam in my pink footies. I'm not talking about the TB disaster LOL. Just bench everyone and forfeit LOL. The Ham recipe for success

Explain to me how delivering the perfect return of Saquan to our rival is anything negative? How does that fantastic obviously exactly what we tried to do game reflect negative on our team? So blowing out the Giants using their own best player in front of their own fans is actually just showcasing how little AJ is a weapon for us the rest of the season. I mean we trashed them and rested our guys early. Just nothing negative there.

3 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

SO the coach should not demand more?

There you go. Or could it be possible that we actually demand more from our coach? But your missing the coach is the one going backwards and limiting things. The players are demanding the more from him. Absolutely right the coach shouldn’t limit and short cut to win right now. 

1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Explain to me how delivering the perfect return of Saquan to our rival is anything negative? How does that fantastic obviously exactly what we tried to do game reflect negative on our team? So blowing out the Giants using their own best player in front of their own fans is actually just showcasing how little AJ is a weapon for us the rest of the season. I mean we trashed them and rested our guys early. Just nothing negative there.

So then what was different with Cleveland....where it hindered the big picture?

5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Post the damn link

Did I get went on the radio. Or every talking Eagles YouTube channel.

Just now, cunninghamtheman said:

There you go. Or could it be possible that we actually demand more from our coach? But your missing the coach is the one going backwards and limiting things. The players are demanding the more from him. Absolutely right the coach shouldn’t limit and short cut to win right now. 

Explain what was the shortcut to winning...that hindered the long term ....you sound like a politician...saying something vague without using specifics to explain.   

And I think it’s key Didinger wasn’t just out to get hits with this breaking news click bait story. This wasn’t feeling like the players were compelled to have this news spread. They handled it behind closed doors. But Didinger hangs out with Lane. So he takes Eagles football then just brought this up….organic. Not as the players messenger boy.

What's the odds we get an answer regarding Cleveland game?

GB....what do you think?  

Do the peasants get an explanation?

Where is the link?

5 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Did I get went on the radio. Or every talking Eagles YouTube channel.

post the link,you said you had one

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

What's the odds we get an answer regarding Cleveland game?

GB....what do you think?  

Do the peasants get an explanation?

We shouldn't win,we need to plan for week 16

15 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Evidently I need to post the link of how the players came together to confront Siri on how the O has to get better? But I wouldn’t want you to consider any alternatives to Hurts Hating when they were groping last season also. At least Siri’s incompetence gave us the positive of our team won’t just gripe and put up with it. They learned they must be proactively showing unity to confront the coach demanding more.

Yes post it,still waiting

10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Explain to me how delivering the perfect return of Saquan to our rival is anything negative? How does that fantastic obviously exactly what we tried to do game reflect negative on our team? So blowing out the Giants using their own best player in front of their own fans is actually just showcasing how little AJ is a weapon for us the rest of the season. I mean we trashed them and rested our guys early. Just nothing negative there.

I'm not the one who called it weaponizing you were 

10 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

There you go. Or could it be possible that we actually demand more from our coach? But your missing the coach is the one going backwards and limiting things. The players are demanding the more from him. Absolutely right the coach shouldn’t limit and short cut to win right now. 

Winning is bad now?

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

What's the odds we get an answer regarding Cleveland game?

GB....what do you think?  

Do the peasants get an explanation?

I put up Vegas odds the under 1 is winning

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

We shouldn't win,we need to plan for week 16

I'm just curious on this one.... I know you couldn't watch the game...I was pretty much explaining how we were dominating until Barkley stepped out like a dope before getting the 1st down...that led to the blocked FG....made it 10-10... instead of 13 with good chance of even 17-3. 

Ham ( because he likes to go against you with everything, probably because you triggered him with a Hurts comment)   said how we dominated and they got the lucky 10 points.

So now he says that domination was a short cut to winning that game...but hindered our big picture?.

You can understand why I'm confused?

9 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:

And I think it’s key Didinger wasn’t just out to get hits with this breaking news click bait story. This wasn’t feeling like the players were compelled to have this news spread. They handled it behind closed doors. But Didinger hangs out with Lane. So he takes Eagles football then just brought this up….organic. Not as the players messenger boy.

So there is no ink you claimed to have? I'm deaf, radio means nothing to me

Just now, joemas6 said:

I'm just curious on this one.... I know you couldn't watch the game...I was pretty much explaining how we were dominating until Barkley stepped out like a dope before getting the 1st down...that led to the blocked FG....made it 10-10... instead of 13 with good chance of even 17-3. 

Ham ( because he likes to go against you with everything, probably because you triggered him with a Hurts comment)   said how we dominated and they got the lucky 10 points.

So now he says that domination was a short cut to winning that game...but hindered our big picture?.

You can understand why I'm confused?

Yes I missed alot of it effing with the steal stream site they took down. TD 123 got me the link back but the game was almost over so I was just watching it on fantasy to at least get the play by play

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I'm just curious on this one.... I know you couldn't watch the game...I was pretty much explaining how we were dominating until Barkley stepped out like a dope before getting the 1st down...that led to the blocked FG....made it 10-10... instead of 13 with good chance of even 17-3. 

Ham ( because he likes to go against you with everything, probably because you triggered him with a Hurts comment)   said how we dominated and they got the lucky 10 points.

So now he says that domination was a short cut to winning that game...but hindered our big picture?.

You can understand why I'm confused?

IDK he said we should stop the short term to do better long term,so I guess winning now in the game you are in today is the hindrance. We should be planning for weeks 16 and 17 and into being good in March and April