June 18Jun 18 3 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:Not only are we NOT doing thatWe're sending at least $300 billion for them to rebuildArt of the DealWe're sending $24B for them to do whatever they want with and then at least $300B for them to "rebuild" with.
June 18Jun 18 Trump is being killed by his own party over this "deal". LOL"Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave," fumed Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) in a social media post, calling the war and its outcome the "worst foreign policy blunder in decades.""Iran's nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future. Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal," he wrote on the social platform X."Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped," he continued."History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal," said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the lack of significant Iranian concessions on its nuclear program, its weapons arsenal and its long-standing practice of funding militant proxies throughout the Middle East raises serious concerns. He pointed out the deal doesn't prevent Iran from continuing to enrich uranium or toll the strait, and "it gives them a lot of money they can use to fund their proxies."Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said it's hard to argue that Trump's decision to order joint missile strikes with Israel against Iran in late February produced an outcome to justify the cost in lives and munitions.Tillis said the deal appears weak "on its face.""You got to do the balance of accounts: a hundred billion roughly, maybe more, spent today; 13 dead, 365 wounded, injured; our partners in the Middle East bombed, they've had casualties. There's got to be a lot of return on that," Tillis said, summing up the cost of the conflict.He said Trump appears to have fallen well short of his objectives at the start of the war."We set out by saying we were going to drive down to zero their nuclear capability. Now we're equivocating on that. We said that we were not going to make the mistake that Obama did by sending them a plane full of cash. I got to reconcile the numbers there," he said."There's a lot of work to be done to convince me that we're on the right path," Tillis added.Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) warned last month that agreeing to a 60-day ceasefire to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran would be a "disaster.""The rumored 60-day ceasefire — with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith — would be a disaster. Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!" he warned in a post on X."When you say this is on the ledger for Iran, certainly helping them, what we need to look at then is what is the corresponding win for the United States?" said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). "I think we actually need to look at the agreement itself. I think we need to have it presented to us with an opportunity for us to ask those questions."
June 18Jun 18 43 minutes ago, Paul852 said:@greenskeeper Just so he get a little alert. How nice would it be if we all did it?Honestly, it would probably be the greatest moment of his life lmao
June 18Jun 18 1 hour ago, VanHammersly said:We're sending $24B for them to do whatever they want with and then at least $300B for them to "rebuild" with.and you're either full of hate or just too stupid not to see how this is the greatest deal ever.
June 18Jun 18 Just now, Alpha_TATEr said:and you're either full of hate or just too stupid not to see how this is the greatest deal ever.It's the former. My hate has blinded me. I'm sorry.
June 18Jun 18 1 hour ago, barho said:Trump is being killed by his own party over this "deal". LOL"Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave," fumed Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) in a social media post, calling the war and its outcome the "worst foreign policy blunder in decades.""Iran's nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future. Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal," he wrote on the social platform X."Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped," he continued."History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal," said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the lack of significant Iranian concessions on its nuclear program, its weapons arsenal and its long-standing practice of funding militant proxies throughout the Middle East raises serious concerns. He pointed out the deal doesn't prevent Iran from continuing to enrich uranium or toll the strait, and "it gives them a lot of money they can use to fund their proxies."Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said it's hard to argue that Trump's decision to order joint missile strikes with Israel against Iran in late February produced an outcome to justify the cost in lives and munitions.Tillis said the deal appears weak "on its face.""You got to do the balance of accounts: a hundred billion roughly, maybe more, spent today; 13 dead, 365 wounded, injured; our partners in the Middle East bombed, they've had casualties. There's got to be a lot of return on that," Tillis said, summing up the cost of the conflict.He said Trump appears to have fallen well short of his objectives at the start of the war."We set out by saying we were going to drive down to zero their nuclear capability. Now we're equivocating on that. We said that we were not going to make the mistake that Obama did by sending them a plane full of cash. I got to reconcile the numbers there," he said."There's a lot of work to be done to convince me that we're on the right path," Tillis added.Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) warned last month that agreeing to a 60-day ceasefire to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran would be a "disaster.""The rumored 60-day ceasefire — with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith — would be a disaster. Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!" he warned in a post on X."When you say this is on the ledger for Iran, certainly helping them, what we need to look at then is what is the corresponding win for the United States?" said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). "I think we actually need to look at the agreement itself. I think we need to have it presented to us with an opportunity for us to ask those questions."all never trumpers!!!
June 18Jun 18 5 hours ago, Mike31mt said:I literally couldn't give two ish about it. You all need to go outside for a while.We took out the Ayatollah and they will not get a nuke. I've been promised in here that Trump would hand deliver this to Iran.Our goal shouldnt be the total annihilation of the nation or Iran, we need their insane Muslim leadership gone. The entire world doesObama gives Iran $1.7 billion in exchange for Iran giving up 98% of their enriched uranium and submitting to frequent nuclear inspections.Mike31: OMG!!! Obama is the worst! He’s giving money to terrorists that they will use to fund terrorism!!!!Trump gives Iran $325 billion to open up a strait that was open before he attacked Iran.Mike31: seriously guys who cares. You all have TDS. Go outside for a while.Remember guys, it’s definitely not a cult.Hey, what sound did Mike make when he got to the ball? Answer: *gagging noises
June 18Jun 18 4 minutes ago, Phillyterp85 said:Obama gives Iran $1.7 billion in exchange for Iran giving up 98% of their enriched uranium and submitting to frequent nuclear inspections.Mike31: OMG!!! Obama is the worst! He’s giving money to terrorists that they will use to fund terrorism!!!!Trump gives Iran $325 billion to open up a strait that was open before he attacked Iran.Mike31: seriously guys who cares. You all have TDS. Go outside for a while.Remember guys, it’s definitely not a cult.Hey, what sound did Mike make when he got to the ball?Answer: *gagging noisesThere's a pretty simple explanation...
June 18Jun 18 4 hours ago, Mike31mt said:This is how the TDS brain works, where a fund dedicated to infrastructure is the same as sending them liquid cash that they almost certainly immediately used to fund terrorismObama was paper tiger, Iran knows Trump can and will take out their leadership and there's not a whole lot they can do about it."A fund dedicated to infrastructure”. Holy sh-t……..money is fungible numbnuts. Trumpers: it doesn’t matter that money given to planned parenthood isn’t allowed to be used for abortions. Money is fungible so it means that this frees up more money for them to do abortions that they otherwise couldn’t do. So it still funds abortions.Also Trumpers: Guys, Iran isn’t going to be allowed to use this money for building missiles and funding terror proxies. It’s in a box that’s clearly marked "for instructors only!” So that’s all it’s going to be allowed to be used for. This won’t allow them to fund terror proxies or their missile program.
June 18Jun 18 Has the Islamic Republic in its 48 year history ever had a leader who has done more for that regime than Ayatollah Donald Dumb?
June 18Jun 18 Who would you guys say was the likely replacement for Trump/republicans in the 2028 election? If it was Vance, it looks like Trump is more interested in preserving his own image than strengthening Vance's position to carry the torch in to the future. Vance is now being made the face of this Iran deal.
June 18Jun 18 As hilariously pathetic as this MOU is, i have to admit I don't think almost any of this is gonna actually happen. Trump stiffs everybody, he'll stiff Iran too. All of this is conditional and none of the conditions will be met. This is Trump's cover so he can slink away with his tail between his legs. The sanctions will be lifted until oil prices are back down and probably go back to trying to choke their economy later. He's just gonna leave this mess as it is and let them toll the straight to their hearts content while he stumbles into his next catastrophic blunder.He'll spin in at as brilliant feint and of course MAGA will lick it off the floor.
June 18Jun 18 17 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:Who would you guys say was the likely replacement for Trump/republicans in the 2028 election?If it was Vance, it looks like Trump is more interested in preserving his own image than strengthening Vance's position to carry the torch in to the future. Vance is now being made the face of this Iran deal.I'm still in the camp of "Unless he dies, Trump is going to be president in 2029." He's isn't building this ballroom for the next guy.
June 18Jun 18 1 hour ago, HazletonEagle said:Who would you guys say was the likely replacement for Trump/republicans in the 2028 election?If it was Vance, it looks like Trump is more interested in preserving his own image than strengthening Vance's position to carry the torch in to the future. Vance is now being made the face of this Iran deal.Interesting question. They really should make a thread for this
June 18Jun 18 2 hours ago, HazletonEagle said: his own image than strengthening Vance's position to carry the torch in to the future.It cracks me up that there are still people out there who think Trump cares about anyone other than himself. He doesn't give a sh** about a "torch"
June 18Jun 18 2 hours ago, HazletonEagle said:Who would you guys say was the likely replacement for Trump/republicans in the 2028 election?If it was Vance, it looks like Trump is more interested in preserving his own image than strengthening Vance's position to carry the torch in to the future. Vance is now being made the face of this Iran deal.He sicced a mob of violent ignorant goobers after his previous VP. Feels like we're living in different universes to even consider that he'd ever be interested in strengthening Vance's position. If Trump is alive, he's not gonna relinquish power. And if he does, it'll be to Don Jr.
June 18Jun 18 10 minutes ago, Paul852 said:It cracks me up that there are still people out there who think Trump cares about anyone other than himself. He doesn't give a sh** about a "torch"are those people in the room with us?
June 18Jun 18 Just now, Lloyd said:He sicced a mob of violent ignorant goobers after his previous VP. Feels like we're living in different universes to even consider that he'd ever be interested in strengthening Vance's position. If Trump is alive, he's not gonna relinquish power. And if he does, it'll be to Don Jr.Oh thats interesting. I havent seen that theory yet.
June 18Jun 18 1 minute ago, HazletonEagle said:Oh thats interesting. I havent seen that theory yet.He doesn't have quite the same charm. But if he says something about woke and hating Mexicans, he'll at least be viable.
June 18Jun 18 4 minutes ago, Lloyd said:He doesn't have quite the same charm. But if he says something about woke and hating Mexicans, he'll at least be viable.That does sound pretty good.
June 18Jun 18 25 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:are those people in the room with us?Yeah, it's the person who suggested it would even be a possibility in the first place. Of course Trump is only concerned with his own image over the good of any other man/woman. That much has been obvious for decades.
Create an account or sign in to comment