June 18Jun 18 20 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:He says while literally coming back to reply to a tagged post. Oops lmao. Agreed.
June 18Jun 18 23 minutes ago, Paul852 said:You literally just came back.I literally just responded. Now twice, but only because I like you. Next is to say F off and to keep blocking people like the 5 posts above this (6 with the weak midget) that say you've chosen to ignore Boogyman. Glad I'm on all your minds constantly. Get lives. Even better get mental health treatment.
June 18Jun 18 4 minutes ago, Diehardfan said:I literally just responded. Now twice, but only because I like you. Next is to say F off and to keep blocking people like the 5 posts above this (6 with the weak midget) that say you've chosen to ignore Boogyman. Glad I'm on all your minds constantly. Get lives. Even better get mental health treatment.Oh. Wow!
June 18Jun 18 43 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:"Stop laughing, It's for their infrastructure, guys! They need the $300B more than us, stop being so heartless! They're human beings just like us!"Money is fungible. It's basically the definition of fungible.Paying to rebuild infrastructure literally* means funds are freed elsewhere for whatever Iran is able to fund and resource.Obama's deal was significantly better. Even if you don't think the Obama deal was good, it was vastly superior to what's on the table here.* proper usage
June 18Jun 18 1 hour ago, Dave Moss said:Now c’mon Vikas. You know progressive Dems don’t know how to win. It’s like being a Jets fanIt's just amazing. They'd rather be "right" (in their warped minds) than win. My first boss on the buyside taught me that being right and making money aren't the same thing.
June 18Jun 18 1 hour ago, Mike31mt said:I literally couldn't give two ish about it. You all need to go outside for a while.We took out the Ayatollah and they will not get a nuke. I've been promised in here that Trump would hand deliver this to Iran.Our goal shouldnt be the total annihilation of the nation or Iran, we need their insane Muslim leadership gone. The entire world doesHey Mike, remember when you said for years that Obama's deal with them was the worst deal in history because he gave them 1.7B and then Trump signed a deal with them to give them over 300B?
June 18Jun 18 55 minutes ago, Mike31mt said:This is how the TDS brain works, where a fund dedicated to infrastructure is the same as sending them liquid cash that they almost certainly immediately used to fund terrorismObama was paper tiger, Iran knows Trump can and will take out their leadership and there's not a whole lot they can do about it.Mf'er said "a fund dedicated to infrastructure"
June 18Jun 18 45 minutes ago, Paul852 said:How exactly is that MAGA?Its not. We also NEVER give improvement funds to a regime we defeated when said regime is still in power. This is the dumbest ish ever. Trump and his administration are absolute joke.When we helped rebuild Japan and Germany after WWII both of those regimes had changed cause.....THEY LOST!!!. Iran not only didn't lose, THEY WON WITH THIS DEAL!!!
June 18Jun 18 10 minutes ago, vikas83 said:It's just amazing. They'd rather be "right" (in their warped minds) than win.My first boss on the buyside taught me that being right and making money aren't the same thing.I don't think Hasan saying that to Cassidy will matter in this case (Cassidy's not gonna stop sheeting on the deal because of it), but yeah, the far left's desire for purity and to constantly talk about sins of the past is absolutely a never-ending self-inflicted wound.
June 18Jun 18 if you guys are disgusted now, wait til we find out who gets the contracts to "reconstruct" iran.
June 18Jun 18 5 minutes ago, dawkins4prez said:if you guys are disgusted now, wait til we find out who gets the contracts to "reconstruct" iran.If any nepotism is involved, im sure @Mike31mt will be absolutely furious!
June 18Jun 18 34 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said:diehard's post leading status just proves you all have TDS.
June 18Jun 18 38 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said:Money is fungible. It's basically the definition of fungible.Paying to rebuild infrastructure literally* means funds are freed elsewhere for whatever Iran is able to fund and resource.Obama's deal was significantly better. Even if you don't think the Obama deal was good, it was vastly superior to what's on the table here.* proper usage
June 18Jun 18 2 hours ago, Mike31mt said:I literally couldn't give two ish about it. You all need to go outside for a while.We took out the Ayatollah and they will not get a nuke. I've been promised in here that Trump would hand deliver this to Iran.Our goal shouldnt be the total annihilation of the nation or Iran, we need their insane Muslim leadership gone. The entire world doesNot only are we NOT doing thatWe're sending at least $300 billion for them to rebuildArt of the Deal
June 18Jun 18 2 minutes ago, VanHammersly said:Nooo...see, it's not a psychotic regime anymore because we killed the one leader and then he was replaced by his son. Way different now.
June 18Jun 18 3 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:Not only are we NOT doing thatWe're sending at least $300 billion for them to rebuildArt of the DealWe're sending $24B for them to do whatever they want with and then at least $300B for them to "rebuild" with.
June 18Jun 18 Trump is being killed by his own party over this "deal". LOL"Ronald Reagan is rolling over in his grave," fumed Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) in a social media post, calling the war and its outcome the "worst foreign policy blunder in decades.""Iran's nuclear ambitions were not curbed, and they have learned that threatening the Strait of Hormuz works and will undoubtedly leverage it in the future. Now, Iran gets to build brand-new infrastructure under this deal," he wrote on the social platform X."Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped," he continued."History teaches that giving billions of dollars to theocratic lunatics who want to murder us is not a good idea. I think the president is receiving some very poor advice on this deal," said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said the lack of significant Iranian concessions on its nuclear program, its weapons arsenal and its long-standing practice of funding militant proxies throughout the Middle East raises serious concerns. He pointed out the deal doesn't prevent Iran from continuing to enrich uranium or toll the strait, and "it gives them a lot of money they can use to fund their proxies."Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said it's hard to argue that Trump's decision to order joint missile strikes with Israel against Iran in late February produced an outcome to justify the cost in lives and munitions.Tillis said the deal appears weak "on its face.""You got to do the balance of accounts: a hundred billion roughly, maybe more, spent today; 13 dead, 365 wounded, injured; our partners in the Middle East bombed, they've had casualties. There's got to be a lot of return on that," Tillis said, summing up the cost of the conflict.He said Trump appears to have fallen well short of his objectives at the start of the war."We set out by saying we were going to drive down to zero their nuclear capability. Now we're equivocating on that. We said that we were not going to make the mistake that Obama did by sending them a plane full of cash. I got to reconcile the numbers there," he said."There's a lot of work to be done to convince me that we're on the right path," Tillis added.Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) warned last month that agreeing to a 60-day ceasefire to negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran would be a "disaster.""The rumored 60-day ceasefire — with the belief that Iran will ever engage in good faith — would be a disaster. Everything accomplished by Operation Epic Fury would be for naught!" he warned in a post on X."When you say this is on the ledger for Iran, certainly helping them, what we need to look at then is what is the corresponding win for the United States?" said Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). "I think we actually need to look at the agreement itself. I think we need to have it presented to us with an opportunity for us to ask those questions."
June 18Jun 18 43 minutes ago, Paul852 said:@greenskeeper Just so he get a little alert. How nice would it be if we all did it?Honestly, it would probably be the greatest moment of his life lmao
June 18Jun 18 1 hour ago, VanHammersly said:We're sending $24B for them to do whatever they want with and then at least $300B for them to "rebuild" with.and you're either full of hate or just too stupid not to see how this is the greatest deal ever.
June 18Jun 18 Just now, Alpha_TATEr said:and you're either full of hate or just too stupid not to see how this is the greatest deal ever.It's the former. My hate has blinded me. I'm sorry.
Create an account or sign in to comment