Just now, Godfather said:

Need a weekly prediction guy

@greend is going to record them.

34 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

@mattwill your persistent comments about my negativity sufficiently irritated me to partially accept your challenge. I took your position-by-position 2026 comp and analysis of lineup holes and ran it by Chatgpt, Claude, and reddit message general NFL discussion board....only issue is reddit didn't take the bait and the boards for specific team auto-restrict any Eagles content.

Your take (mostly cut and pasted):

We have no holes in the 22 starters.
QB: Improved because Jalen Hurts will now run more with new OC.
RB: RB is stronger now than it was 12 months ago. Barkley improved this year over 2025 due to longer offseason. Bigsby improved over last year due to more time with the team.
WR: Wicks caught 30 out of 44 targets last year with an 11.1 YPC average and is not a hole as WR2. Cooper in the WR3 slot is not a hole. Losing AJ Brown offset by his toxicity being removed.
TE: TE2 is an inline blocking position and is not a hole with Mundt. But overall less talented this year.
OC: improved because Jurgens is healthier and has better depth.
RT: Improved because Lane Johnson was injured last year and not this year. Bell is better depth.
LG: Improved. Dickerson health is a question mark but position improved because better depth.
LT: Improved with same starter and better depth with Bell.
RG: Improved with another year experience for Steen and better depth.

DT: Improved because of more experience for the starters.
DE: Improved and more talented with Greenard.
LB: push. Still with Baun. Lost Dean replaced with Campbell.
CB: Improved with new CB2 and more experience for Mitchell/Dejean.
S: push.
In summary: no holes. About 11 positions/groups improved. About 1 step back. About 3 pushes.

The ask: Hoping some non Eagles fans with some separation from the situation can help settle a friendly debate with your perspective on the Eagles roster, specifically with the comparison of upgrades vs downgrades of 2026 versus last year. (I won't tell you where I fall on this debate). Grade the take, -10 being negative, 0 being spot on, +10 being homertastic bias.

ChatGPT:

I’d score this +8/10 homertastic.

The Eagles still have an elite, contender-level roster. But the analysis uses an asymmetrical standard: every favorable projection is booked as an upgrade, while injuries, aging, uncertainty, and major departures are minimized.

Group	Neutral verdict
QB	Push / possible improvement. More designed runs may help Hurts, but a new system isn’t automatically an upgrade—especially with a first-time OC installing major changes.
RB	Push / slight improvement. Bigsby’s added familiarity and Barkley’s longer offseason help. But Barkley is now 29 after 280 carries, so "definitely improved” is too confident.
WR	Major downgrade and legitimate question mark. A.J. produced 78 catches, 1,003 yards and seven TDs. Wicks had 30/332/2; Cooper had 9/92/0. "Removing toxicity” might improve harmony, but it doesn’t replace an elite X receiver who dictates coverage. Official 2025 statistics
TE	Slight downgrade/question. Mundt can fill the blocking assignment, but Stowers has been hurt and Calcaterra is on IR. The fact that Philadelphia has considered further TE help tells you the position isn’t entirely settled.
C	Slight upgrade. A healthier Jurgens plus improved depth is reasonable.
RT	Push / slight upgrade. Healthy Lane is enormous, but Lane is 36 and Bell remains a promising, currently banged-up rookie—not proven depth.
LG	Push. Dickerson potentially being healthier helps, but his durability remains a real uncertainty.
LT	Push. Mailata is still elite. One rookie swing tackle shouldn’t be counted as a separate upgrade at both LT and RT.
RG	Slight upgrade. Steen’s additional development and better interior depth make this fair.
DT	Slight upgrade. Natural development from Carter, Davis and Ojomo is a reasonable projection, although another birthday doesn’t automatically equal improvement.
EDGE	Push / possible upgrade. Greenard has the better pass-rushing résumé than Phillips, but he had only three sacks in an injury-shortened 2025 and is currently returning from a pec injury. It’s promising, not yet bankable.
LB	Push. Campbell’s upside and extra experience can offset Dean’s departure. Fair assessment.
CB	Clear upgrade. Woolen plus another year for Mitchell and DeJean could make this an exceptional trio.
S	Downgrade/question—not a push. Blankenship departed; Epps was predominantly a backup last year; Mukuba is returning from a broken ankle; and full-time safety depth is thin. Safety has repeatedly been identified as Philadelphia’s biggest weakness. Current depth chart

A more defensible ledger is approximately:

• Five upgrades: C, RG, DT, EDGE—tentatively—and CB

• Six pushes: QB, RB, RT, LG, LT, LB

• Three downgrades: WR, TE and S

And the WR downgrade is substantially larger than, say, improved backup depth at center.

The three biggest homer tells are:

1. Healthy Eagles are counted as upgrades, while Greenard’s current injury barely registers.

2. Youthful players receive automatic improvement for aging, while Barkley, Lane and Goedert receive no aging risk.

3. A.J.’s "toxicity” is used to erase 1,000 yards and seven touchdowns.

So: excellent roster, entirely credible contender, but "no holes and 11 upgrades versus one downgrade” is aggressive Eagles accounting. +8.

Claude:

Fun exercise. I'd score this around a +6: not delusional homerism, but it leans on nearly every classic homer rationalization. Here's the tell — of 15 position groups, your friend found 11 upgrades, 3 pushes, and exactly one downgrade... on a team that just traded a 1,000-yard WR1 and lost its starting linebacker. When every question mark resolves in your favor, that's the bias talking.

Where the assessment is fair:

• DE/Edge: Legitimately improved. The Greenard trade made an already strong front seven even better — he's earned pass-rush grades above 70.0 and generated 45+ pressures in each of the past three seasons, and Ebiketie adds depth. Though note Greenard missed all of training camp with injury and was activated from the PUP list, with the team expecting him to play sometime within the first month — so even the clearest upgrade comes with an asterisk your friend didn't mention. Pro Football FocusNBC10 Philadelphia

• DT: The Carter/Davis/Ojomo trio is genuinely elite; calling it strong is just accurate.

• CB: Reasonable. Mitchell and DeJean entering year three is a real thing, and Woolen is a credible CB2.

Where the homerism shows:

• WR is the big one. "Losing AJ Brown offset by his toxicity being removed" is peak homer logic. The neutral view: the trade made long-term sense, netting a 2028 first-rounder, but there's no replacing a player of his caliber in the short term — even in a down year he topped 1,000 yards in 2025. Wicks' 11.1 YPC on 44 targets is a WR3/4 stat line being sold as proof he's a solid WR2, and Lemon is a rookie. Chemistry arguments have some validity, but "addition by subtraction" involving a top-15 receiver is a downgrade until proven otherwise. This should be the clear step back, not TE2. Pro Football Focus

• The health double-standard. Lane Johnson (age 36) is an upgrade because he "won't be injured this year," but Dickerson's health is waved off because of depth. Assuming your own guys stay healthy is the single most common form of fan bias. Also note Hurts is learning a new offense under Sean Mannion with mixed results in training camp — a new OC is a variable, not an automatic QB upgrade. NBC Sports Philadelphia

• "More experience" as a universal upgrade. Steen, Bigsby, Mitchell, DeJean, the DT rotation — young players improving with experience is plausible but not guaranteed, and it's applied to every single young Eagle while no aging Eagle (Johnson, Goedert, Dalton-tier depth) is assumed to decline.

• LB as a push is generous — swapping Nakobe Dean for a second-year Campbell might work out, but calling it a wash preemptively is optimistic.

A neutral evaluator would probably say: roster is legitimately top-5 in the NFL, defense probably did improve, but WR took a real short-term hit, and the honest tally is more like 5-6 upgrades, 5-6 pushes, and 2-3 downgrades or open questions. "No holes" and "11 upgrades, 1 step back" is where it tips from optimism into homer territory — hence +6 rather than something closer to 0.

I only used chat and just copied it in

+7 homertastic

From a neutral roster-evaluation lens, I’d grade this about +6.5 homer, rounded to +7.

The important distinction: I do think the Eagles enter 2026 with one of the best rosters in football. PFF likewise describes them as one of the NFL’s most talented rosters and ranks the offensive line No. 2 entering the season. So the optimism itself isn't crazy.

Where the homerism shows up is in the accounting.

Group	My 2026 vs. 2025 grade	Why
QB	Push / slight upside	Same quarterback. Hurts running more could help the offense, but that's a schematic projection, not a roster upgrade. Mannion has talked about leaning into Hurts' running ability, but the heavier under-center offense could also reduce some shotgun designed runs.
RB	Slight up / push	Bigsby having a full offseason is a legitimate positive after arriving in September 2025 and averaging 5.9 YPC for Philly. But declaring Barkley himself "improved" before the season is speculative. He's 29 and went from 2,005 yards/5.8 YPC in 2024 to 1,140/4.1 in 2025. A longer offseason helps, but it doesn't automatically make an older RB better.
WR	Clear downgrade	This is the biggest homer take. Wicks absolutely belongs in an NFL rotation — 30 catches, 332 yards, 11.1 YPC in 2025 — and the room is deeper with Wicks, Hollywood Brown, Makai Lemon, Elijah Moore, etc. But A.J. Brown was a three-time All-Pro who went over 1,000 yards again last season. Even Roseman called him a "huge" loss that would require multiple players to replace. "Less toxicity" isn't a football-value replacement for an elite WR1.
TE	Down	Agree. Mundt is a very good blocker — PFF grades cited by the Eagles had him top 10 among qualifying TEs in both run and pass blocking — but the overall room currently has questions, particularly with Calcaterra starting on IR and Stowers still developing.
OL overall	Up, but not five separate upgrades	Jurgens being healthier is real: he openly said his 2025 offseason back surgery left him behind all year. Lane being healthy is enormous after missing the final eight games. Steen having 17 starts under his belt matters. And Bell adds upside. But counting C, LT, LG, RG and RT all as independent upgrades because of health/experience/depth inflates the score.
DT	Slight up	Reasonable. Carter, Davis, Ojomo and the younger rotation are at ages where development is plausible. I wouldn't call another year of experience an automatic upgrade, but this is defensible.
EDGE	Up, with an asterisk	Greenard gives them a player who had 12.5 and 12 sacks in 2023-24. That's a meaningful addition. But he had only three sacks in 12 games in 2025, had December surgery, and started camp on PUP. They also lost Jaelan Phillips, who produced 34 pressures in only eight Eagles games. So "more talented" is plausible; "obvious upgrade" is stronger than I'd go.
LB	Push	Basically agree. Baun remains the anchor, Campbell is a very promising Year 2 player, but Dean's departure isn't nothing. Also, Campbell already started 10 games and made 74-plus tackles last season, so some of his anticipated improvement was already part of the 2025 team.
CB	Up	This is one of the cleanest upgrades. Woolen brings length, speed and a track record of ball production, while Mitchell and DeJean are entering another year of development. Woolen had 12 passes defended last year despite starting only seven games.
S	Push/slight down	I'd be less bullish here. Reed Blankenship left after recording 83 tackles last year, and Mukuba/Epps is not obviously better today. CBS called safety likely the weakest spot on this roster entering camp. Mukuba making a Year 2 leap could turn it into a push or better.

Why I land at +7 rather than +3

There's a consistent one-way ratchet in the original reasoning:

Returning young player → "more experienced, therefore improved."
Returning veteran → "healthier/longer offseason, therefore improved."
New veteran → "more talented, therefore improved."
New rookie/depth → "better depth, therefore improved."
Major departure → "chemistry/toxicity offsets the talent loss."

If you apply those rules simultaneously, it's almost mathematically impossible to find downgrades.

Lane Johnson is a good example. Saying 2026 Lane > late-2025 Eagles RT situation is obviously true because Lane missed the final eight games. But if the comparison is September 2026 roster versus September 2025 roster, Lane was also the healthy starting RT 12 months ago. Markel Bell is an exciting third-round rookie, but calling him definitively better depth before his first NFL regular-season snap is a projection — especially when Fred Johnson was already good enough to start seven games during Lane's absence.

The same thing happens with Hurts. His rushing dropped from 150 attempts/630 yards in 2024 to 105/421 in 2025, so restoring that element could absolutely improve the offense. But "the new OC might deploy the same QB better" isn't evidence that the QB position itself was upgraded.

And WR is where the scale really tips. Wicks can simultaneously be a perfectly acceptable NFL WR2/3 and still represent a substantial downgrade from having A.J. Brown opposite DeVonta Smith. Those aren't contradictory ideas. Philadelphia may successfully replace Brown's aggregate production through Smith + Wicks + Hollywood + Lemon, but you have to see it first.

So my neutral scorecard is closer to 4–6 genuine/slight upgrades, several pushes, and 2–3 downgrades/question marks, rather than "11 upgrades, one downgrade."

One other tiny thing: the arithmetic in the original post doesn't quite match the categories listed. There are 14 groups listed, while "11 improved + 1 step back + 3 pushes" totals 15.

Final grade: +7 homertastic. The conclusion that the Eagles have an elite roster with no crippling hole is defensible. The homerism is in treating nearly every source of uncertainty as upside while treating the clearest loss — A.J. Brown — as essentially neutral because of chemistry. That's too favorable an accounting to call "spot on."

21 minutes ago, Godfather said:

Berman might be one of the worst things in espn history

Those old Boomers still doing a 30 year old schtick of silly sound effect noises and talking like a man-baby should've died out decades ago.

25 minutes ago, Godfather said:

Berman might be one of the worst things in espn history

His act wore thin back in the early 2000‘s. I once saw him on the plane in Pittsburgh the morning after the MLB All Star game in 2006 I believe. Big sloppy SOB.

34 minutes ago, eagle45 said:

@mattwill your persistent comments about my negativity sufficiently irritated me to partially accept your challenge. I took your position-by-position 2026 comp and analysis of lineup holes and ran it by Chatgpt, Claude, and reddit message general NFL discussion board....only issue is reddit didn't take the bait and the boards for specific team auto-restrict any Eagles content.

Your take (mostly cut and pasted):

We have no holes in the 22 starters.
QB: Improved because Jalen Hurts will now run more with new OC.
RB: RB is stronger now than it was 12 months ago. Barkley improved this year over 2025 due to longer offseason. Bigsby improved over last year due to more time with the team.
WR: Wicks caught 30 out of 44 targets last year with an 11.1 YPC average and is not a hole as WR2. Cooper in the WR3 slot is not a hole. Losing AJ Brown offset by his toxicity being removed.
TE: TE2 is an inline blocking position and is not a hole with Mundt. But overall less talented this year.
OC: improved because Jurgens is healthier and has better depth.
RT: Improved because Lane Johnson was injured last year and not this year. Bell is better depth.
LG: Improved. Dickerson health is a question mark but position improved because better depth.
LT: Improved with same starter and better depth with Bell.
RG: Improved with another year experience for Steen and better depth.

DT: Improved because of more experience for the starters.
DE: Improved and more talented with Greenard.
LB: push. Still with Baun. Lost Dean replaced with Campbell.
CB: Improved with new CB2 and more experience for Mitchell/Dejean.
S: push.
In summary: no holes. About 11 positions/groups improved. About 1 step back. About 3 pushes.

The ask: Hoping some non Eagles fans with some separation from the situation can help settle a friendly debate with your perspective on the Eagles roster, specifically with the comparison of upgrades vs downgrades of 2026 versus last year. (I won't tell you where I fall on this debate). Grade the take, -10 being negative, 0 being spot on, +10 being homertastic bias.

ChatGPT:

I’d score this +8/10 homertastic.

The Eagles still have an elite, contender-level roster. But the analysis uses an asymmetrical standard: every favorable projection is booked as an upgrade, while injuries, aging, uncertainty, and major departures are minimized.

Group	Neutral verdict
QB	Push / possible improvement. More designed runs may help Hurts, but a new system isn’t automatically an upgrade—especially with a first-time OC installing major changes.
RB	Push / slight improvement. Bigsby’s added familiarity and Barkley’s longer offseason help. But Barkley is now 29 after 280 carries, so "definitely improved” is too confident.
WR	Major downgrade and legitimate question mark. A.J. produced 78 catches, 1,003 yards and seven TDs. Wicks had 30/332/2; Cooper had 9/92/0. "Removing toxicity” might improve harmony, but it doesn’t replace an elite X receiver who dictates coverage. Official 2025 statistics
TE	Slight downgrade/question. Mundt can fill the blocking assignment, but Stowers has been hurt and Calcaterra is on IR. The fact that Philadelphia has considered further TE help tells you the position isn’t entirely settled.
C	Slight upgrade. A healthier Jurgens plus improved depth is reasonable.
RT	Push / slight upgrade. Healthy Lane is enormous, but Lane is 36 and Bell remains a promising, currently banged-up rookie—not proven depth.
LG	Push. Dickerson potentially being healthier helps, but his durability remains a real uncertainty.
LT	Push. Mailata is still elite. One rookie swing tackle shouldn’t be counted as a separate upgrade at both LT and RT.
RG	Slight upgrade. Steen’s additional development and better interior depth make this fair.
DT	Slight upgrade. Natural development from Carter, Davis and Ojomo is a reasonable projection, although another birthday doesn’t automatically equal improvement.
EDGE	Push / possible upgrade. Greenard has the better pass-rushing résumé than Phillips, but he had only three sacks in an injury-shortened 2025 and is currently returning from a pec injury. It’s promising, not yet bankable.
LB	Push. Campbell’s upside and extra experience can offset Dean’s departure. Fair assessment.
CB	Clear upgrade. Woolen plus another year for Mitchell and DeJean could make this an exceptional trio.
S	Downgrade/question—not a push. Blankenship departed; Epps was predominantly a backup last year; Mukuba is returning from a broken ankle; and full-time safety depth is thin. Safety has repeatedly been identified as Philadelphia’s biggest weakness. Current depth chart

A more defensible ledger is approximately:

• Five upgrades: C, RG, DT, EDGE—tentatively—and CB

• Six pushes: QB, RB, RT, LG, LT, LB

• Three downgrades: WR, TE and S

And the WR downgrade is substantially larger than, say, improved backup depth at center.

The three biggest homer tells are:

1. Healthy Eagles are counted as upgrades, while Greenard’s current injury barely registers.

2. Youthful players receive automatic improvement for aging, while Barkley, Lane and Goedert receive no aging risk.

3. A.J.’s "toxicity” is used to erase 1,000 yards and seven touchdowns.

So: excellent roster, entirely credible contender, but "no holes and 11 upgrades versus one downgrade” is aggressive Eagles accounting. +8.

Claude:

Fun exercise. I'd score this around a +6: not delusional homerism, but it leans on nearly every classic homer rationalization. Here's the tell — of 15 position groups, your friend found 11 upgrades, 3 pushes, and exactly one downgrade... on a team that just traded a 1,000-yard WR1 and lost its starting linebacker. When every question mark resolves in your favor, that's the bias talking.

Where the assessment is fair:

• DE/Edge: Legitimately improved. The Greenard trade made an already strong front seven even better — he's earned pass-rush grades above 70.0 and generated 45+ pressures in each of the past three seasons, and Ebiketie adds depth. Though note Greenard missed all of training camp with injury and was activated from the PUP list, with the team expecting him to play sometime within the first month — so even the clearest upgrade comes with an asterisk your friend didn't mention. Pro Football FocusNBC10 Philadelphia

• DT: The Carter/Davis/Ojomo trio is genuinely elite; calling it strong is just accurate.

• CB: Reasonable. Mitchell and DeJean entering year three is a real thing, and Woolen is a credible CB2.

Where the homerism shows:

• WR is the big one. "Losing AJ Brown offset by his toxicity being removed" is peak homer logic. The neutral view: the trade made long-term sense, netting a 2028 first-rounder, but there's no replacing a player of his caliber in the short term — even in a down year he topped 1,000 yards in 2025. Wicks' 11.1 YPC on 44 targets is a WR3/4 stat line being sold as proof he's a solid WR2, and Lemon is a rookie. Chemistry arguments have some validity, but "addition by subtraction" involving a top-15 receiver is a downgrade until proven otherwise. This should be the clear step back, not TE2. Pro Football Focus

• The health double-standard. Lane Johnson (age 36) is an upgrade because he "won't be injured this year," but Dickerson's health is waved off because of depth. Assuming your own guys stay healthy is the single most common form of fan bias. Also note Hurts is learning a new offense under Sean Mannion with mixed results in training camp — a new OC is a variable, not an automatic QB upgrade. NBC Sports Philadelphia

• "More experience" as a universal upgrade. Steen, Bigsby, Mitchell, DeJean, the DT rotation — young players improving with experience is plausible but not guaranteed, and it's applied to every single young Eagle while no aging Eagle (Johnson, Goedert, Dalton-tier depth) is assumed to decline.

• LB as a push is generous — swapping Nakobe Dean for a second-year Campbell might work out, but calling it a wash preemptively is optimistic.

A neutral evaluator would probably say: roster is legitimately top-5 in the NFL, defense probably did improve, but WR took a real short-term hit, and the honest tally is more like 5-6 upgrades, 5-6 pushes, and 2-3 downgrades or open questions. "No holes" and "11 upgrades, 1 step back" is where it tips from optimism into homer territory — hence +6 rather than something closer to 0.

Very reasonable, and thank you for taking the initiative to do it. It prompts the following thoughts:

(1) regarding Hurts, as the two AIs how having Patullo as the OC impacted Hurts’ production. Their answer should be interesting. My personal opinion is that Patullo removing Hurts from the designed run game effectively took a 12th Eagles Offense player off the field. Having one more functional player than the opposing Defense is a huge advantage. Patullo took that advantage off the field. Mannion has restored that effective 12th player. See what the AI programs think about that.

(2) Ask the AI how much of an impact on players comes with the wear and tear of three extra games, over four extra weeks, followed by a four week shorter offseason to heal and recover.

(3) The situation at backup QB is real, but is it meaningful. Ask the AI programs how many NFL teams have a backup QB capable of leading the team into the Playoffs and to either the Conference Championship Game or the SB. I will be surprised if the AI programs list even one.

Again thank you for your extra effort.

I wish shocker was here to give his opinion on AI.

2 minutes ago, mattwill said:

Very reasonable, and thank you for taking the initiative to do it. It prompts the following thoughts:

(1) regarding Hurts, as the two AIs how having Patullo as the OC impacted Hurts’ production. Their answer should be interesting. My personal opinion is that Patullo removing Hurts from the designed run game effectively took a 12th Eagles Offense player off the field. Having one more functional player than the opposing Defense is a huge advantage. Patullo took that advantage off the field. Mannion has restored that effective 12th player. See what the AI programs think about that.

(2) Ask the AI how much of an impact on players comes with the wear and tear of three extra games, over four extra weeks, followed by a four week shorter offseason to heal and recover.

(3) The situation at backup QB is real, but is it meaningful. Ask the AI programs how many NFL teams have a backup QB capable of leading the team into the Playoffs and to either the Conference Championship Game or the SB. I will be surprised if the AI programs list even one.

Again thank you for your extra effort.

All we learned is that AI is negative.

Here we go!

5 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

I wish shocker was here to give his opinion on AI.

People would probably complain they couldn't read it because they're not on that G level that he's on

Hope this Eagles season doesn't go in the way of this thread, in spiraling and falling off the cliff. Ugh!

Cheaters

3 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Here we go!

Legend

6 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

I wish shocker was here to give his opinion on AI.

One would think there's something going on with the way you've been begging for him to get unbanned

1 minute ago, Mike030270 said:

One would think there's something going on with the way you've been begging for him to get unbanned

Oh you got me

16 minutes ago, NOTW said:

Those old Boomers still doing a 30 year old schtick of silly sound effect noises and talking like a man-baby should've died out decades ago.

12 minutes ago, Chest Rockwell said:

His act wore thin back in the early 2000‘s. I once saw him on the plane in Pittsburgh the morning after the MLB All Star game in 2006 I believe. Big sloppy SOB.

That sheet got annoying after a year. I always hated him. Then he did the HR derby those few years. Even the bars had the TV on mute. Tom Jackson was solid tho

1 hour ago, Appalachian_Eagle said:

Welcome back! I sent you a PM a while back inquiring about something. I know you've been busy so if it's easier I can just send you another message rather than looking that old one up. Thanks!

I haven't had a chance to look yet, but I will later tonight. If it's not there, I'll send you a PM.

8 minutes ago, EaglePhan1986 said:

Oh you got me

You think Shocker would waste his money on a Stowers jersey? He probably could get them on the market for dirt cheap anyways

3 hours ago, BigEFly said:

Some even searched out folks on other media and attacked them there

Damn that’s commitment.

2 minutes ago, Joe Ball said:

Damn that’s commitment.

Like the cowboys commitment to disappoint every year 😊

Just now, Godfather said:

Like the cowboys commitment to disappoint every year 😊

This year is their year …….. cuz

45 minutes ago, HazletonEagle said:

@greend is going to record them.

@greend is going to take predictions on how badly the eagles will lose each week.

2 minutes ago, Chest Rockwell said:

This year is their year …….. cuz

Because they kept Williams and the other guy they paid and had the best draft. Also Pickens will not complain about his contract until about mid-season when they're 5-4 and he wants out