January 24, 20214 yr 56 minutes ago, Toastrel said: Now you believe the WHO? Pick a position, dude. The WHO really didnt have to confirm it. Everything pointed directly to a lab leak.
January 25, 20214 yr 30 minutes ago, SNOORDA said: The WHO really didnt have to confirm it. Everything pointed directly to a lab leak. Right? Qanaon, Trump, Facebook, I even saw it on Twitter. Every credible source says it was man made.
January 25, 20214 yr 9 minutes ago, Boogyman said: Right? Qanaon, Trump, Facebook, I even saw it on Twitter. Every credible source says it was man made. I have never read anything qanaon(i honestly dont know who they are) said and i never had facebook or twitter. As far as trump i dont even consider his opinion(s) on most things especially covid. So that’s like 4 strikes for you. My conclusion was made about 8 months ago that it came out of the lab in wuhan.
January 25, 20214 yr 1 minute ago, SNOORDA said: I have never read anything qanaon(i honestly dont know who they are) said and dont have facebook. As far as trump i dont even consider his opinion(s) on most things especially covid My conclusion was made about 8 months ago that it came out of the lab in wuhan. Cool. Where did you get the data to draw your conclusion?
January 25, 20214 yr Yeah I Fn hate trump and even I know the likelihood of it starting organically was low. Obviously wasn’t an intentional leak, but if the CCP can’t cut a corner they build a corner just so they can cut it. They’re notorious for that.
January 25, 20214 yr 44 minutes ago, Bill said: Yeah I Fn hate trump and even I know the likelihood of it starting organically was low. Obviously wasn’t an intentional leak, but if the CCP can’t cut a corner they build a corner just so they can cut it. They’re notorious for that. Based on what though? In the past 20 years we've seen 3 separate cases of novel coronaviruses causing pandemics so it's not like this is unheard of behavior.
January 25, 20214 yr 5 hours ago, TEW said: https://torontosun.com/news/world/who-advisor-covid-19-pandemic-started-via-a-lab-leak For all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these, 'TEW was right again'. because one former WHO advisor hanging out in Mexico says so? "hey guys, joe from south philly says Duce should have been named HC, see TEW was right"
January 25, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, Boogyman said: Cool. Where did you get the data to draw your conclusion? Here. In the emb. Where else?
January 25, 20214 yr 54 minutes ago, DEagle7 said: Based on what though? In the past 20 years we've seen 3 separate cases of novel coronaviruses causing pandemics so it's not like this is unheard of behavior. And throughout all of human history, we've had diseases. So...why is this one a conspiracy versus every other damn pandemic any civilization has faced? Other than it starting in China, and China being a bad guy, what else ya got?
January 25, 20214 yr 4 hours ago, Toastrel said: Now you believe the WHO? Pick a position, dude. I picked him specifically because he is a hardline democrat and Biden advisor who went against the WHO. Figured it would be fun seeing everyone freak out about it. Mission accomplished. And my position has been consistent. The most likely cause is a leak from the lab which was a global center of coronavirus excitements, not a wet market that didn’t sell bats which themselves lived a 7 hour train ride away. Of course, the same people saying I’m wrong about this are the same people who were saying "it’s not even the flu” around this time last year. Now they’re all virologists and genetics experts. 55 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: because one former WHO advisor hanging out in Mexico says so? "hey guys, joe from south philly says Duce should have been named HC, see TEW was right" He’s a former Biden advisor. And he’s not the only one saying this.
January 25, 20214 yr 2 minutes ago, TEW said: I picked him specifically because he is a hardline democrat and Biden advisor who went against the WHO. Figured it would be fun seeing everyone freak out about it. Mission accomplished. And my position has been consistent. The most likely cause is a leak from the lab which was a global center of coronavirus excitements, not a wet market that didn’t sell bats which themselves lived a 7 hour train ride away. Of course, the same people saying I’m wrong about this are the same people who were saying "it’s not even the flu” around this time last year. Now they’re all virologists and genetics experts. He’s a former Biden advisor. And he’s not the only one saying this.
January 25, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, SNOORDA said: Here. In the emb. Where else? Nowhere legit. But thanks for making your position clear.
January 25, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, DEagle7 said: Based on what though? In the past 20 years we've seen 3 separate cases of novel coronaviruses causing pandemics so it's not like this is unheard of behavior. Both natural and man made origins are possible. Nothing has been ruled out and anyone who claims to have done so is a liar or idiot or both. The evidence suggests man made IMO. The bats this supposedly originated from were a 7 hour train ride away and weren’t sold at the wet market. The protein spike is conspicuously perfect for a human rather than a bat. And one of the few labs in the world that openly experimented on these viruses specifically with the intention of human transition which also had years worth of documented warnings about leaks was a few miles away from ground zero. This is a pretty good investigative piece from NYMag. It’s long, so if you’ve got a minute you might find it interesting, but his basic theory is he believes it most likely originated from a 2012 virus that was then experimented on at the Wu Han lab. https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/coronavirus-lab-escape-theory.html
January 25, 20214 yr Yeah, take it from the guy who literally said "you can't rule out aliens" regarding the San Diego UFO incident, and at the very least, it was proof the military developed anti-gravity propulsion technology akin to warp drive that will revolutionize the way humans travel. He's definitely well grounded in reality. So instead of trusting a WHO advisor, whose just an author with a degree in history and literally with no background in any of the medical or biological sciences, I'll instead trust someone a bit more credentialed when it comes to virology... Quote The combination of circumstances produced a high level of public suspicion that SARS-CoV-2 was the product of such a "gain of function” experiment, with a furin site deliberately inserted into the Bat_RaTG13 framework. Several scientists, with great urgency, posted analyses on virological.org that showed, either at the RNA or protein level, that there was no molecular evidence either supporting laboratory manipulation or showing that SARS-CoV-2 could have been derived from any known virus in any laboratory inventory. My analysis grounded in RNA sequence concerning Bat_RaTG13 was posted shortly before midnight Feb 6 [18]. A wider analysis, also ruling out an origin from laboratory isolates derived from pangolins, grounded in peptide sequence, was posted 10 days later, on February 16, and later published https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-020-04750-z
January 25, 20214 yr On 1/23/2021 at 7:05 AM, EagleVA said: So, who thinks it's a coincidence that Hammering Hank passed away two weeks after taking the COVID-19 vaccine? There are no reports of Hank having health issues prior to getting vaccinated. Agreed. The chances of a man that was only 86 years old dying are extremely low. Almost unprecedented. We must know the truth!
January 25, 20214 yr 9 hours ago, TEW said: I picked him specifically because he is a hardline democrat and Biden advisor who went against the WHO. Figured it would be fun seeing everyone freak out about it. Mission accomplished. And my position has been consistent. The most likely cause is a leak from the lab which was a global center of coronavirus excitements, not a wet market that didn’t sell bats which themselves lived a 7 hour train ride away. Of course, the same people saying I’m wrong about this are the same people who were saying "it’s not even the flu” around this time last year. Now they’re all virologists and genetics experts. He’s a former Biden advisor. And he’s not the only one saying this. Funny, it sure seems, as usual, you picked somebody you would never ever trust. However, since he says something you agree with, you are all on board the trust train. Then you gloat and say "I told you so" The fun, is watching you do it again and again. You pretending you're a virologist. You examined the clinical data and now you agree. Uh huh.
January 25, 20214 yr On 1/23/2021 at 4:26 AM, Eaglesfandan said: Yeah, but what does Zuker think about all of this? he thinks he better hide from cvon for a little bit longer.
January 25, 20214 yr 11 hours ago, DEagle7 said: Based on what though? In the past 20 years we've seen 3 separate cases of novel coronaviruses causing pandemics so it's not like this is unheard of behavior. It’s "science” Doc
January 25, 20214 yr Meanwhile Millions of Vaccine Doses Are M.I.A.—and Feds Aren’t Sure Why https://news.yahoo.com/millions-vaccine-doses-m-feds-100525358.html
January 25, 20214 yr @UK_EaglesFan89 This must've been what you were referring to the other day. The concern is not totally unfounded, but lower antibody levels don't necessarily translate to higher levels of infection among the vaccinated populations. Could just mean immunity wanes quicker requiring a booster after 4 months vs 12 months or something to that effect. This SA variant is definitely something to keep an eye on though. Moderna says it’s working on Covid booster shot for variant in South Africa, says current vaccine provides some protection Quote The vaccine generated a weaker immune response against the South African strain, but the antibodies remained above levels that are expected to be protective against the virus, the company said, adding the findings may suggest "a potential risk of earlier waning of immunity to the new B.1.351 strains.” "Out of an abundance of caution and leveraging the flexibility of our mRNA platform, we are advancing an emerging variant booster candidate against the variant first identified in the Republic of South Africa into the clinic to determine if it will be more effective to boost titers against this and potentially future variants,” Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel said in a statement. https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/25/covid-vaccine-moderna-working-on-covid-booster-shots-for-south-african-strain.html
January 25, 20214 yr 10 hours ago, Toastrel said: Funny, it sure seems, as usual, you picked somebody you would never ever trust. However, since he says something you agree with, you are all on board the trust train. Then you gloat and say "I told you so" The fun, is watching you do it again and again. You pretending you're a virologist. You examined the clinical data and now you agree. Uh huh. I’m not the one claiming genetics tests proved something about its origin, genius. And YES I picked someone from the Democratic Party specifically because it is not someone I would normally agree with. Purposely so. To watch the sh** libs in here lose their minds over it. Is this so hard to understand?
January 25, 20214 yr 24 minutes ago, TEW said: I’m not the one claiming genetics tests proved something about its origin, genius. And YES I picked someone from the Democratic Party specifically because it is not someone I would normally agree with. Purposely so. To watch the sh** libs in here lose their minds over it. Is this so hard to understand? So you decided to agree with someone you would never agree with to make "libs in here lose their minds" on a football message board? You guys really are coming unhinged, huh?
January 26, 20214 yr 50 minutes ago, Boogyman said: So you decided to agree with someone you would never agree with to make "libs in here lose their minds" on a football message board? You guys really are coming unhinged, huh? Some trumpbots are taking the election loss harder than others.
January 26, 20214 yr 1 hour ago, TEW said: I’m not the one claiming genetics tests proved something about its origin, genius. And YES I picked someone from the Democratic Party specifically because it is not someone I would normally agree with. Purposely so. To watch the sh** libs in here lose their minds over it. Is this so hard to understand? Thanks for proving my point and the bonus of being too stupid to understand that. You post something from somebody you don't normally believe, but do now, because they have an OPINION you agree with. You have no idea, since we all know YOU are not a virologist. I really appreciate your self-own.
Create an account or sign in to comment