September 19, 20215 yr 4 hours ago, Kz! said: interesting He's a moron. Most of the deaths are concentrated in the older population where the vaccination rate is much higher than the general population rate. Well, I might venture this guy knows he's being disingenuous. You're showing yourself again to be the moron by sharing it.
September 19, 20215 yr 11 hours ago, DrPhilly said: Once 80% of the population have received a single dose the Australian state of Victoria will remove one restriction and allow outdoor tennis and gold to be played. That's estimated to be within a week or so. Once 80% of double doses are in play (months away) then people will be allowed to have visitors in their homes and stores can reopen. That is still months away. Police state.
September 20, 20215 yr 23 hours ago, Kz! said: Lmfao let’s go!!! You find this funny? Wow, you are a total POS.
September 20, 20215 yr 19 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Sounds like Biden playing 9D chess. Conservatives actually would have gotten the vaccine, but Biden knew they couldn’t bear to get own by the libs
September 20, 20215 yr Small drips of new info, still waiting on the application though. There were 2,268 participants ages 5 to 11 in the trial, which, while it still followed a two-dose regimen, used a lesser dose than the amount given to people ages 12 and older, for the "safety, tolerability and immunogenicity" of younger children. "In participants 5 to 11 years of age, the vaccine was safe, well-tolerated and showed robust neutralizing antibody responses," the companies said in a news release. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-safe-effective-kids-ages/story?id=80119249 Unfortunately, the FDA or its advisory committee might say the trial enrollment was less than ideal and thus characterize it as underpowered. Let's hope that's not the case, otherwise we might lose a couple months or more here.
September 20, 20215 yr 4 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: Small drips of new info, still waiting on the application though. There were 2,268 participants ages 5 to 11 in the trial, which, while it still followed a two-dose regimen, used a lesser dose than the amount given to people ages 12 and older, for the "safety, tolerability and immunogenicity" of younger children. "In participants 5 to 11 years of age, the vaccine was safe, well-tolerated and showed robust neutralizing antibody responses," the companies said in a news release. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-safe-effective-kids-ages/story?id=80119249 Unfortunately, the FDA or its advisory committee might say the trial enrollment was less than ideal and thus characterize it as underpowered. Let's hope that's not the case, otherwise we might lose a couple months or more here. My biggest criticism of the FDA throughout this is that they've been far too conservative. I really think you're going to see a push for a reduction in the regulatory framework to get a bit more aggressive, especially during a time when the risk of delaying because of some knit-picking is worse than not getting it perfect the first go around. Regulatory agencies like this are incentivized to be cautious to a fault. Regulators don't typically get blamed when they err heavily to the side of caution, even if too much caution results in loss of life. But they will get blamed if there's a perception that they fast tracked a drug or procedure that ends up resulting in even a small number of side-effects that weren't caught but can be publicized. The whole incentive structure is out of whack because we as a people tend to overreact to small risks that come with something new while downplaying bigger risks of the status quo.
September 20, 20215 yr 6 minutes ago, JohnSnowsHair said: My biggest criticism of the FDA throughout this is that they've been far too conservative. I really think you're going to see a push for a reduction in the regulatory framework to get a bit more aggressive, especially during a time when the risk of delaying because of some knit-picking is worse than not getting it perfect the first go around. Regulatory agencies like this are incentivized to be cautious to a fault. Regulators don't typically get blamed when they err heavily to the side of caution, even if too much caution results in loss of life. But they will get blamed if there's a perception that they fast tracked a drug or procedure that ends up resulting in even a small number of side-effects that weren't caught but can be publicized. The whole incentive structure is out of whack because we as a people tend to overreact to small risks that come with something new while downplaying bigger risks of the status quo. To me, this is a make or break decision for them. I'm giving them 6 weeks from the application date to get this no-brainer of an application authorized. Anything beyond that, and they've F'ed up in a huge way. There were no cases of myocarditis, no cases of anaphylaxis, no cases of blood clotting, nothing as far as I've seen reported as an adverse reaction. Efficacy was also shown to be high, with antibody titers on par with the 16-25 year old age control group. Obviously we'll know more when we see the data readout, but this should be an absolute F'ing slam dunk if this press release is accurate. Ball's in your court soon, FDA.
September 20, 20215 yr 5 minutes ago, we_gotta_believe said: To me, this is a make or break decision for them. I'm giving them 6 weeks from the application date to get this no-brainer of an application authorized. Anything beyond that, and they've F'ed up in a huge way. There were no cases of myocarditis, no cases of anaphylaxis, no cases of blood clotting, nothing as far as I've seen reported as an adverse reaction. Efficacy was also shown to be high, with antibody titers on par with the 16-25 year old age control group. Obviously we'll know more when we see the data readout, but this should be an absolute F'ing slam dunk if this press release is accurate. Ball's in your court soon, FDA. Are you sure about that? Because some ICU doctor from St. Louis said the ERs in NY are about 30% people with adverse vaccine reactions. Twatter said it so it must be true right? /s
September 20, 20215 yr I sometimes forget how old people are in this forum until someone like gannan comes along and uses the 5-year-old drake meme template to try to be funny. I'm sure he'll call me "triggered" or "snowflake" at some point today confirming that he's several years behind in all things internet.
September 20, 20215 yr imagine being stupid enough to believe masking is child abuse. none of my kids like wearing masks. but none of them consider it more than an inconvenience. they have a better grasp of reality than many adults. the kid in that video looks too young to even be required to wear a mask. even if he is, are you such a snowflake that you think anything a kid cries about is "abuse"? kids cry about anything. they'll cry because they don't have a shirt on, then they're cry because you put a shirt on them. so please snowflake, tell me more about how we coddle kids too much while at the same time "raging at epic levels" because a kid is crying.
September 20, 20215 yr 15 minutes ago, Kz! said: I sometimes forget how old people are in this forum until someone like gannan comes along and uses the 5-year-old drake meme template to try to be funny. I'm sure he'll call me "triggered" or "snowflake" at some point today confirming that he's several years behind in all things internet. Well it is a pro football team centric forum. I am not sure what more you expect from it.
September 20, 20215 yr 5 minutes ago, VanHammersly said: My rage... So stunning. So brave. Poor Trump
September 20, 20215 yr My youngest struggled with masks early on last spring / summer. The first time she had to wear one for a prolonged period of time was for her cousin's baptism. She whined in the church quite a bit, repeating "mask is ridiculous" which I fought hard not to laugh at. But she eventually got over it, and was fine later in the summer and had no issue at all when it was time to go to preschool in the fall. She also recently complained about her backpack the first day of kindergarten because we had to put her school supplies in there for the year since they didn't do an open house this year. But oddly enough, nobody said that was child abuse. Maybe they would've if a certain president made comments more about it during his failed campaign for re-election.
September 20, 20215 yr Toddler throws a tantrum and this causes GOP rage. Makes sense, since both are the same thing, basically.
Create an account or sign in to comment