29 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Honestly I’ll say 3-3 in the division. 
NY had played us tough seem to have a beat on how to play Hurts our offense has really struggled vs them.

Washington without a 3rd string QB in likely a closer game then last year

Dallas can we keep pace??? Even without Amari the Dallas O will be potent. 

I have us at 4-2 beating the gnats twice(3-3 at the bye then taking off as this gels) 11 wins if all goes well

43 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I think Rodgers might be the most talented sure not sure I’d call him the best though just my opinion.

Brady just wins hard for me to say he isn’t the best.

Mahomes and Allen both pushing Rodgers for the most talented now those two are scary good in different ways. 

I'm thinking Justin Herbert should have a terrific year

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

have us at 4-2 beating the gnats twice(

With how the Giants kept us in check last year hard for me to give us the win twice vs them. Hope your right though 

3 minutes ago, mjkline1958 said:

Yeah, obviously didn't watch Nevada and don't put a lot into highlight reels, but his reads, arm and accuracy is impressive - of course vs some pretty underwhelming competition.

I like to watch all the throws for a QB quicker then watching the entire game but still get a sense of the good and bad with the player 

 

4 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

With how the Giants kept us in check last year hard for me to give us the win twice vs them. Hope your right though 

I like to watch all the throws for a QB quicker then watching the entire game but still get a sense of the good and bad with the player 

 

IDK they are shaky at QB,Bark seems injury prone,lots of weak rooks on the lines. WR's are coverable now, Engram is gone IMO the only way they beat us is  if we let them

4 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:

Sounds fairly basic. Fairly standard game plan vs any QB. He’s seen and faced that plenty I would assume.

Really...is the game plan to prevent Tom Brady from rolling to his right ?  I don't think game planning for Hurts is standard at all.

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

IDK they are shaky at QB,Bark seems injury prone,lots of weak rooks on the lines. WR's are coverable now, Engram is gone IMO they only way they beat us is  if we let them

What happens last year games would have been really bad if they had an offense. Yet they held our offense in check. There D played us extremely well. 
 

Im not concerned for our D but our O moving the ball back them. 

Just now, Bleedinggreen93 said:

What happens last year games would have been really bad if they had an offense. Yet they held our offense in check. There D played us extremely well. 
 

Im not concerned for our D but our O moving the ball back them. 

I don't think they were really worried about Reagor, but they need to worry about AJ

53 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I wouldn’t call them so young one is 25(Sweat)the other turns 26(Barnett) and they are entering there 5th and 6th seasons as pros.

Definitely should be seeing guys that are ready to breakout they are entering there peak years 

Ham has the 10 year curve for some players to learn how to play in the league.

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I don't think they were really worried about Reagor, but they need to worry about AJ

Don’t have to worry about any WR if the QB has issues getting them the ball and that wasn’t the biggest issue against them  

1 minute ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

Don’t have to worry about any WR if the QB has issues getting them the ball and that wasn’t the biggest issue against them  

We have WR's to worry about now. Easy to put your ONE CB on someones only real WR threat. Now we have AJ to cover and we can stick pascal in and as we have all said no excsues for Hurts to get them the ball. If he can't beat the gnats twice, I would consider that a fail. 

First game vs NY hurts was 14/31 129 yards passing 3ints we could only manage to score 7 points against them 

2nd game was better for us but as hard as it is to believe the Giants O was far worse in game 2 then game 1 and there D unit held strong for the entire first half finally cracking on the 2nd half for us to win big. 
 

But for the span of 6 qtrs that Giants D had our number 

I think we split with the wuss based on there will be one game we give away and I think this one is it. We play one stinker a year at least LOL. The Vikes game is the BIOG one for me. Early game vs a matched opponent. It should show us if Hurts is ready. great game to watch siri coach,to see if he learned anything too

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

We have WR's to worry about now. Easy to put your ONE CB on someones only real WR threat. Now we have AJ to cover and we can stick pascal in and as we have all said no excsues for Hurts to get them the ball. If he can't beat the gnats twice, I would consider that a fail. 

GB... going by what is on paper.

BG ... going by the reality of how bad Hurts has been.     

Absolutely on the QB if we can't bear the Giants.... now instead of Bradberry covering Reagor... thru have whoever covering AJ.  On paper should be huge advantage..   in reality can the QB take advantage?

5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

First game vs NY hurts was 14/31 129 yards passing 3ints we could only manage to score 7 points against them 

2nd game was better for us but as hard as it is to believe the Giants O was far worse in game 2 then game 1 and there D unit held strong for the entire first half finally cracking on the 2nd half for us to win big. 
 

But for the span of 6 qtrs that Giants D had our number 

Our offense was sporadic alot last year. 3 ints is a killer in any game. I don;t expect 3 picks vs them ever again. Our O line is tougher than last year. mailiata came on late and Dickerson looks good. Hurts should have plenty of time to find targets vs them

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

I think we split with the wuss based on there will be one game we give away and I think this one is it. We play one stinker a year at least LOL. The Vikes game is the BIOG one for me. Early game vs a matched opponent. It should show us if Hurts is ready. great game to watch siri coach,to see if he learned anything too

I think you have JJ fever.... the Vikes is the home opener on a Monday night.   Team wasn't good last year.  On paper ( for those not thinking JJ is Jerry Rice) should be easy Eagles win)

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Our offense was sporadic alot last year. 3 ints is a killer in any game. I don;t expect 3 picks vs them ever again. Our O line is tougher than last year. mailiata came on late and Dickerson looks good. Hurts should have plenty of time to find targets vs them

Right... he " should"  ....on paper, but will he deliver on the field?

Just now, joemas6 said:

On paper ( for those not thinking JJ is Jerry Rice) should be easy Eagles win)

Lot of games on paper look like they should be easy wins for the Eagles yet we see us struggle…

The one thing the Vikings do have going for them is an offense that can get hot and score points in a hurry. 

Golladay,Sheppard, Slayton should be their starters. I think we can cover them and I am hoping to see a pass rush that was MEH last year. We always intimidated Eli and I want to do that now. Would not shock me if we saw Tyrod Taylor in that game. I think we would have a harder time covering him

4 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

I think you have JJ fever.... the Vikes is the home opener on a Monday night.   Team wasn't good last year.  On paper ( for those not thinking JJ is Jerry Rice) should be easy Eagles win)

Right... he " should"  ....on paper, but will he deliver on the field?

They also have Theilen and a very good RB in Cook. I think it will be a close game

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

They also have Theilen and a very good RB in Cook. I think it will be a close game

Had those guys last year

6 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Right... he " should"  ....on paper, but will he deliver on the field?

This is the year to find out lol

1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

Would not shock me if we saw Tyrod Taylor in that game. I think we would have a harder time covering him

I don’t think so Danny Dimes also gashes us for a pretty big run. And when he actually has time which is super rare he can make pretty good throws. 
 

I 100% believe we SHOULD handle the Giants easy but based on what I’ve seen hard to say we sweep them 

2 minutes ago, joemas6 said:

Had those guys last year

All experienced and ready to go,we gonna be "gelled" by week 2? I have my doubts

Just now, GreenbleedinNC said:

All experienced and ready to go,we gonna be "gelled" by week 2? I have my doubts

Most of the team is the same no reason we aren’t. Only new piece on O is AJ

D has few more new faces in Bradberry, Reddick and Dean or White but the other 8 are the same.

Id be more concerned about how the Vikings are with a new HC learning a new scheme we should have the edge with an entire year for our players under there belt 

2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:

All experienced and ready to go,we gonna be "gelled" by week 2? I have my doubts

Ehhh... the Philly fans in the first home game drinking up a storm all day waiting... home field advantage is going to be huge that game.

3 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said:

I don’t think so Danny Dimes also gashes us for a pretty big run. And when he actually has time which is super rare he can make pretty good throws. 
 

I 100% believe we SHOULD handle the Giants easy but based on what I’ve seen hard to say we sweep them 

If they are down and Danny sucks,I can see them making a QB move in that game. Tyrod is more like Hurts who can run around in the backfield to buy throwing time. I suspect the speed of Davis will counter and pocket passer running. Something to watch for. Every NFCE game is pull out the stops if you are down. Should be fun for Bradberry lol