joemas6 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Made the exact point of obsessively drafting Oline is more than possible Not really how it came across. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, joemas6 said: Right... i can see that. For me it's whether he plays 2026. They just extended him... I'm sure there were conversations there ... you follow my logic? Yeah,I'm sure they had to be convinced like I did. So they must be more confident than me about him completing his contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: So you are absolutely against upgrading the position in anyway possible? Every "upgrade" comes at a cost,whether it is monetary or a draft pick. So we got Swift and Penny in and since they have NOT PLAYED yet,how do you know what an "upgrade" would be especially an expensive one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 27 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Who knows,I find that hard to believe. Too many other errors. I mean we win if the QB doesn't hand a free 6 to KC. We win if the field wasn't trash,then again thats not an exuse either because we led at the 1/2. Our punting was awful. In the SB you have to hit on all cylinders and we did not. Add in some BAD ref calls and..... We dominated rushing all year. RBs contributed hardly any quality in the SB. Sure we can point to several things. But why not RB that we had so much success all season…laid an egg. Don’t think the RB stinking part is even a debatable subject. Whether Scott would have been better obviously we don’t know. Almost no version to think he does any worse though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 Just my opinion on Boston Scott in the SB. I think the coaches blew that call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemas6 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: So you are absolutely against upgrading the position in anyway possible? Yes... I won't over pay ...or draft RB round 1. Anything else to add to the group I am open to. I would offer Cook or Fournette a little over minimum to join the committee. I think that ship probably passed, but who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: We dominated rushing all year. RBs contributed hardly any quality in the SB. Sure we can point to several things. But why not RB that we had so much success all season…laid an egg. Don’t think the RB stinking part is even a debatable subject. Whether Scott would have been better obviously we don’t know. Almost no version to think he does any worse though. Once again,we "dominated" rushing because we had a top O line and an EASY schedule. This year alot tougher,let's see how our rushing game does now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemas6 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Yeah,I'm sure they had to be convinced like I did. So they must be more confident than me about him completing his contract And they are in the know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 And I will stick my neck out and say we GOT Penny because we are playing better rushing D lines that we have had to face the last 2 years and he is known as a short yardage banger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 Kind of Siri selected Gainwell. So he’s tried to force him in as the guy. Had no interest in Boston Scott. But Scott turned him to earn a spot. Nothing elite level with Scott. But the guy is real thick lower body and shorter tough to tackle RB. Can’t think of him fumbling or making huge mistakes ever really either. Just honestly believe Scott was a better option than Sanders or Gainwell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 30 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I like the RBBC because teams have to plan for 4 RB's not just one. We shut down Cook. When you have only 1 RB and you figure out how to stop them,that team is now 1 dimensional and there is NO "adjustment" you can make in your running game. If a team stops Penny,we have alternative plays we can use But we are talking adding an elite player to the same room. Whatever committee or however you divide touches. Why can’t a RBBC feature better quality players? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemas6 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 So Siri forced Gainwell ... he was drafted by the Eagles...and the only one under contract for 2024. Yet all that and he won't be on the 2024 roster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Kind of Siri selected Gainwell. So he’s tried to force him in as the guy. Had no interest in Boston Scott. But Scott turned him to earn a spot. Nothing elite level with Scott. But the guy is real thick lower body and shorter tough to tackle RB. Can’t think of him fumbling or making huge mistakes ever really either. Just honestly believe Scott was a better option than Sanders or Gainwell. Go apply for Siri's job then since you know better lol and let's recall we had the LEAD at the 1/2,so apparently it was working as-is??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemas6 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, cunninghamtheman said: But we are talking adding an elite player to the same room. Whatever committee or however you divide touches. Why can’t a RBBC feature better quality players? You see elite RBs in committees? Which ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 Just now, cunninghamtheman said: But we are talking adding an elite player to the same room. Whatever committee or however you divide touches. Why can’t a RBBC feature better quality players? Didn't we shut down Mr. Elite? Yeah elite in fantasy.If we could shut him down,others can too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 2 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said: But we are talking adding an elite player to the same room. Whatever committee or however you divide touches. Why can’t a RBBC feature better quality players? Swift and Penney aren't quality players? And they may even be better on THIS team. You pay millions for Cook,then you better feed him which takes away from your WR's and TE. So who's stats are you wanting to burn in the passing game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 12 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Yeah,I'm sure they had to be convinced like I did. So they must be more confident than me about him completing his contract I saw it as they ponied up for him to risk himself in the playoffs for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joemas6 Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 I want Cook, CMC and Henry in my committee. Just want to put it out there incase there was any doubt. Pay them a combined 6-10 mil... and if they agree on the $$ and the sharing...then I'm in. Reality check is that doesn't happen. It's why "elite RBs" aren't in committees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Every "upgrade" comes at a cost,whether it is monetary or a draft pick. So we got Swift and Penny in and since they have NOT PLAYED yet,how do you know what an "upgrade" would be especially an expensive one Dalvin Cook has been an elite pro bowl player. I’m totally comfortable leaping to the assumption he’d be the starter and upgrade. Nothing ever is guaranteed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 IDK Dallas overpaid for "quality" RB's so when was their last SB appearance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Dalvin Cook has been an elite pro bowl player. I’m totally comfortable leaping to the assumption he’d be the starter and upgrade. Nothing ever is guaranteed. So when was Minnesota in the SB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 11 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Once again,we "dominated" rushing because we had a top O line and an EASY schedule. This year alot tougher,let's see how our rushing game does now Sanders dominated rushing. Was hurt in the SB and our Oline that was exactly the same didn’t deliver RB production. I mean, not theoretical here, it actually happened. We saw this Oline not carry Gainwell to success cost us the parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 When was Tenn in the SB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenbleedinNC Posted June 10, 2023 Share Posted June 10, 2023 1 minute ago, cunninghamtheman said: Sanders dominated rushing. Was hurt in the SB and our Oline that was exactly the same didn’t deliver RB production. I mean, not theoretical here, it actually happened. We saw this Oline not carry Gainwell to success cost us the parade. SO why didn't we keep Sanders??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cunninghamtheman Posted June 10, 2023 Author Share Posted June 10, 2023 16 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Once again,we "dominated" rushing because we had a top O line and an EASY schedule. This year alot tougher,let's see how our rushing game does now How are you reasoning or explains this logic with what happened in Zona? Surely you aren’t building up the Chiefs run D as so elite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.