Damn, Germaine Pratt re-signed with Cincy 

Why couldn't it have been the Browns so we could root for him?

45 minutes ago, e-a-g-l-e-s eagles! said:

Reminds me i have to do this years racist blog bracket 

it's time for the battle.

4 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

Who cares? He's white.

Well at least now I won’t be the only one getting warning points, welcome 

3 minutes ago, Outlaw said:

Who cares? He's white.

 

35 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

Only if we can get a live feed of Irsay when Wentz walks back into the building. 

6 minutes ago, T-1000 said:

Anyone else bored

I tried to spice it up 

3 minutes ago, RLC said:

Why couldn't it have been the Browns so we could root for him?

Andrew Berry, he ain't no fool 

 

3 minutes ago, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

Well at least now I won’t be the only one getting warning points, welcome 

🤷‍♂️

Somehow sign CGJ and I'm good with FA.

Kelce, Graham, CGJ

Draft

Get back to the Superbowl.

 

3 minutes ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

Never got the love for Ridgeway. I always felt like he was a fringe NFL player.

1 minute ago, LeanMeanGM said:

 

I have a feeling CJGJ isn't signing until tomorrow or Wednesday.

1 minute ago, T-1000 said:

I have a feeling CJGJ isn't signing until tomorrow or Wednesday.

Think him and Bates are waiting for each other to sign to see who gets more

CJGJ tweeted a lot of Bengals stuff.  Which is weird since they let Bates go without paying him

2 minutes ago, T-1000 said:

Never got the love for Ridgeway. I always felt like he was a fringe NFL player.

He was fine as a 4th/5th DT rotational guy. Nothing special though. 

Vonn Bell to the Panthers

1 minute ago, pgcd3 said:

CJGJ tweeted a lot of Bengals stuff.  Which is weird since they let Bates go without paying him

I love CJGJ but Bates is the better player.

38 minutes ago, UndyTaker said:

Is he black?????

I think so 

Maybe it’s Bradberry for us ….

Just now, DawkinsOwnage03 said:

Maybe it’s Bradberry for us ….

I'm fine as the long as they don't lose BOTH Bradberry and CJGJ, though I would prefer to keep CJGJ.

32 minutes ago, Alphagrand said:

It started with the faulty supposition that posters have a problem with Hurts getting paid.  I'm not in here all the time, but I've yet to see more than one poster (I won't identify by name) who has suggested the Eagles would be better off by trading Hurts rather than paying him.

Hurts will get an extension, somewhere in the range of $48-50M per year AAV -- everyone should pretty much know that by now.  Once the deal is made official, I guess we will see who is most upset about it.

Well said.  

1 minute ago, T-1000 said:

I'm fine as the long as they don't lose BOTH Bradberry and CJGJ, though I would prefer to keep CJGJ.

Same 

38 minutes ago, Mike030270 said:

@DawkinsOwnage03 vaguely called some people racist and @RememberTheKoy named Matt but then the post was deleted

 

I deleted it because I didn't see at first that DawkinsOnage meant it as a race issue post.  But I did post in reply that Matt this weekend tried to claim its all economics as the reason to not re-sign Hurts and they should trade him but when I put forward the question about what the Bengals should do with Burrow, he did a 180 and said no the Bengals should re-sign him.

 

So there was and is major hypocrisy there. I never attributed it to race though, just that some people who were wrong about Hurts are too stubborn to accept they were wrong and as a result clearly do not at all appreciate and respect what he brings to this team.  There is no other way around it when you try to claim its all about the economics of that cap that you shouldn't sign a QB to a big deal but then turn around and say the Bengals who are in the exact same situation should give Burrow a big new deal.