March 21, 20241 yr Author 5 minutes ago, Bleedinggreen93 said: For what it’s worth apparently Campbell was the player Howie/Joe Douglas wanted in the 2019 draft before Lurie used his owner card saying he wanted JJaw It's a nice pick up because he can play in or out. Terrific versatility
March 21, 20241 yr 43 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: SO a #5 LB will play? Who is our #3 LB? Yes a #5 LB could be playing special teams for sure
March 21, 20241 yr 44 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Brady was a round 6, Maybe Milton is the next Brady and we don't know it Yeah... one guy out of how many... go look at how many 5th round picks have actually contributed over the last 25 years, some pretty good players. Team has too many holes to worry about using yet another pick on a #4 QB. You aren't getting the concept of how we just used 4 draft picks between last year,this year and 2 next year on QBs. That's already enough investment and they are all locked under contract.
March 21, 20241 yr 49 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: 3 QB's rostered 1 on the PS,alot of teams have this. Except SF who found out the hard way SF went through 4 QBs... so you are preparing for Hurts, Pickett, McKie and thr next guy to get hurt. Prioritize that scenario over getting someone who could actually play a decent amount?
March 21, 20241 yr Author 50 minutes ago, joemas6 said: SF went through 4 QBs... so you are preparing for Hurts, Pickett, McKie and thr next guy to get hurt. Prioritize that scenario over getting someone who could actually play a decent amount? It happened though didn't it?
March 21, 20241 yr Author 55 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Yeah... one guy out of how many... go look at how many 5th round picks have actually contributed over the last 25 years, some pretty good players. Team has too many holes to worry about using yet another pick on a #4 QB. You aren't getting the concept of how we just used 4 draft picks between last year,this year and 2 next year on QBs. That's already enough investment and they are all locked under contract. Not my fault they invested poorly and gave up too much
March 21, 20241 yr Author 1 hour ago, joemas6 said: Yeah... one guy out of how many... go look at how many 5th round picks have actually contributed over the last 25 years, some pretty good players. Team has too many holes to worry about using yet another pick on a #4 QB. You aren't getting the concept of how we just used 4 draft picks between last year,this year and 2 next year on QBs. That's already enough investment and they are all locked under contract. You always say "just get me the best guys I don't care what the position is" but now the tune changes. if Milton is the "best guy" at pick 172 what do you do? Anyway I put up another mock with NO QB's so you should be happy about that. Pick one up as a UDFA
March 21, 20241 yr Author 10 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: It happened though didn't it? You can laugh but SF didn't find it amusing..There was also a game vs the Wuss were they ran out or were on QB4(if I recall)
March 21, 20241 yr 7 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Not my fault they invested poorly and gave up too much Why did they invest poorly and give up too much? They got a first round guy as a back up for peanuts locked up for 2 years. A 3rd string guy locked up for 3 more years. That 3rd string guy you liked over your starter as a pocket passer. How many teams have gotten a 1st round QB for two 7th round picks and moving back 22 spots. Or have a 3rd string guy apparently better than the starter? Gotta invest more there?
March 21, 20241 yr Author Just now, joemas6 said: Why did they invest poorly and give up too much? They got a first round guy as a back up for peanuts locked up for 2 years. A 3rd string guy locked up for 3 more years. That 3rd string guy you liked over your starter as a pocket passer. How many teams have gotten a 1st round QB for two 7th round picks and moving back 22 spots. Or have a 3rd string guy apparently better than the starter? Gotta invest more there? If he is the best player on the board,then you take him
March 21, 20241 yr 2 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: You can laugh but SF didn't find it amusing..There was also a game vs the Wuss were they ran out or were on QB4(if I recall) I'm willing to lose if we get to our 5th QB. I'm willing to wager KC, Buffalo and a few other teams are conceding if there starter gets hurt...let alone the backup and the guy after that. I'll tak my chances with Celek, Trent Cole, Ike Reese, Gainwell, Dion Lewis, Big V, ND Kalu...etc.
March 21, 20241 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: If he is the best player on the board,then you take him Not always with QB,Punter, Kicker, Long snapper...the positions with one guy playing.
March 21, 20241 yr Author Just now, joemas6 said: I'm willing to lose if we get to our 5th QB. I'm willing to wager KC, Buffalo and a few other teams are conceding if there starter gets hurt...let alone the backup and the guy after that. I'll tak my chances with Celek, Trent Cole, Ike Reese, Gainwell, Dion Lewis, Big V, ND Kalu...etc. Yeah great if you're going into the playoffs with no QB
March 21, 20241 yr 5 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said: You can laugh but SF didn't find it amusing..There was also a game vs the Wuss were they ran out or were on QB4(if I recall) What was Washington going to do if they had their 2nd or 3rd QB in? They suck...you gotta build a team first before you worry about QB 4. The Eagles aren't there yet.
March 21, 20241 yr Author 2 minutes ago, joemas6 said: Not always with QB,Punter, Kicker, Long snapper...the positions with one guy playing. I get that,but QB's are better trade bait than a round 5 LB. Maybe he's better than McKee. But you don't know if he;s not on your team. Why should McKee just be handed the job?
March 21, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: Yeah great if you're going into the playoffs with no QB Yeah... absolutely...which team ever won with QB 4?
March 21, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: I get that,but QB's are better trade bait than a round 5 LB. Maybe he's better than McKee. But you don't know if he;s not on your team I'm concede when you tell me in the history of football...which team won. Playoff game with their 4th string QB.
March 21, 20241 yr Author 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: Yeah... absolutely...which team ever won with QB 4? We beat he niners because they ran out lol
March 21, 20241 yr Just now, joemas6 said: I'm concede when you tell me in the history of football...which team won. Playoff game with their 4th string QB. And they did it with questionable TE2, Slot WR, backups RB, depth on the lines and questions at CB and LB?
March 21, 20241 yr Author 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: And they did it with questionable TE2, Slot WR, backups RB, depth on the lines and questions at CB and LB? No matter,if you have no QB you can't win,you may as well forfeit
March 21, 20241 yr 1 minute ago, GreenbleedinNC said: We beat he niners because they ran out lol Who won with a 4th string QB? Lol lol lol lol lol. You think the 49ers 4th string QB would have beaten us?
March 21, 20241 yr Just now, GreenbleedinNC said: No matter,if you have no QB you can't win,you may as well forfeit I have 3 of them already
March 21, 20241 yr Author 1 minute ago, joemas6 said: And they did it with questionable TE2, Slot WR, backups RB, depth on the lines and questions at CB and LB? And why they now have the emergency QB rule
March 21, 20241 yr Author Just now, joemas6 said: Who won with a 4th string QB? Lol lol lol lol lol. You think the 49ers 4th string QB would have beaten us? It's better than none
Create an account or sign in to comment