July 23, 2025Jul 23 44 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:LMAO I love how you bash the questioner when you refuse to answer a question ,like it's their fault you won't answer HAHAHAHA. Just more comedic value. You need t take it on the road. Now comes the change of subject or completely ignoring the question, until we ask it again in 3 yearsI didn’t ignore it…flat told you not worthy of my answer.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 17 minutes ago, GreenbleedinNC said:I can't get UNDER your standards. it was a simple straightforward question. Your droning on about worthless things is a far lower standard than I can get under Instead just refuse to answer the question, it's what you do and if you were in my ompany(or any other) you'd be fired immediately. Just ridiculous dodging, deflection and denialFine..what was this deep thought of a question you are pondering that’s you feel is such a great question again? I’ll answer it…just for your sake. No idea why you’d drone on about whatever it was?
July 23, 2025Jul 23 20 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:So Ham are you going to answer this question?No I would not trade Saquan for Miles. Duhh…Saquan is far superior. Answered this terrible question everybody knows the obvious and easy answer to. Hope that makes you happy…or assists whatever you needed from me by answering.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 52 minutes ago, cunninghamtheman said:I didn’t ignore it…flat told you not worthy of my answer.Why not? Both questions look like a good questions to me. The first one requires a fair amount of speculation, but the second one is straightforward. Hearing your thoughts would be interesting.How many yards was Barkley denied playing with the Gnats trash O line? He was basically their entire offense. So would you trade Barkley for Sanders even up? Why or why not?
July 23, 2025Jul 23 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:I didn’t ignore it…flat told you not worthy of my answer.That isn’t a collaborative approach to participation in this thread. What is your objective to collaboration?
July 23, 2025Jul 23 1 hour ago, GreenbleedinNC said:14-3 just horrendous, really you need to be on the 9ers boardThat team…considering the personnel also….should in anyway be least capable scoring team in the first quarter of anybody?
July 23, 2025Jul 23 35 minutes ago, mattwill said:Why not? Both questions look like a good questions to me. The first one requires a fair amount of speculation, but the second one is straightforward. Hearing your thoughts would be interesting.How many yards was Barkley denied playing with the Gnats trash O line? He was basically their entire offense.So would you trade Barkley for Sanders even up? Why or why not?Terrible questions…not even anything questionable. Miles for Saquan isn’t even debatable or questionable trade.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 35 minutes ago, mattwill said:That isn’t a collaborative approach to participation in this thread. What is your objective to collaboration?Ok…so I succumb and answered the terrible question…the obvious answer everybody already knew.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Author 2 hours ago, cunninghamtheman said:No I would not trade Saquan for Miles. Duhh…Saquan is far superior. Answered this terrible question everybody knows the obvious and easy answer to. Hope that makes you happy…or assists whatever you needed from me by answering.What is your reasoning and why do you continue to support Sanders if the answers is "obvious" Why bring Sanders up at all???
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Author 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:That team…considering the personnel also….should in anyway be least capable scoring team in the first quarter of anybody?Still clueless as to what a feel out process is. You've never watched boxing in your life. Thanks for finally answering, SOOOOOO hard to do. We could have saved 20 posts if you'd just do this first LOL
July 23, 2025Jul 23 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:Terrible questions…not even anything questionable. Miles for Saquan isn’t even debatable or questionable trade.It is my understanding you have been pimping Miles for pretty much the last two/three seasons. Do I have that wrong?
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Author 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:That team…considering the personnel also….should in anyway be least capable scoring team in the first quarter of anybody?Does it matter who wins the first 15 minutes???? Or does it matter who leads at the end. GO slow, you can do it
July 23, 2025Jul 23 1 hour ago, cunninghamtheman said:Ok…so I succumb and answered the terrible question…the obvious answer everybody already knew.That was big hearted of you. Good to see that side of you.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 11 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:LOL because you're in a corner now and you'd have to commit to an answer, no dodging or BS HAHAHA. Really juvenileHahaha…if you think something so weak and pathetic as that has me cornered? You’ve never met any beast like me…nothing close.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 11 hours ago, GreenbleedinNC said:You have said(before) Sanders was a "special talent", but Barkley choked. Then to back it up(apparently) you posted that Sanders had more YPC(by some miniscule amount) than Barkely. So the question was, would you trade Sanders for Barkley even up? Then, explain your reasoning and why Sanders fell off the cliff AFTER he left here yet Barkley exceeded his days with the Gnats.Barkley did choke. Sanders choked even harder in the SB than Barkley did though. Sanders wasn’t even to be trusted on the field in the SB anymore after trying to fumble the ball away twice right in the beggining. I didn’t say Sanders was so special. Your confusion stems from your belief that Gainwell was starter worthy in any committee backfield. I just pointed out my observations with our prioritized created advantage our team was built on….dominant monster run blocking Oline. Mailata, Dickerson and Lane deliver crushing huge gaping hole pancake run blocks every game. So it’s important to take full advantage of those. Sanders just had that explosive ability to do so. Give a nice hole/lane to run? Sanders could take it to the house….of at least a huge gain. But Gainwell? Those opportunities the run blocking created time to time he just would turn into a first down producing run…instead of a 70 yard TD strike.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Let’s just go ahead and evaluate my words and opinions now in hindsight from years ago about this situation. Seemed clear to me then….but obviously not to all(especially right here). What would you say you witnessed this last season from Saquan? Was he a RB that took advantage of these opportunities created?
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Let’s assess your opinions occurring countering my thoughts a few seasons back. You claimed committee approach was the way. You stated over and over …”RB doesn’t matter. It’s all Oline.” You even favored Gainwell to start the RB committee as being the answers for us. Didn’t want to pay a RB…or really value a RB much at all(understatement in fact). So did adding Saquan,the elite RB, make a difference? Was it all just Oline…like you preached? Like you still harp on in #HurtsHater attempts.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Offensive player of the year, greatest all time rushing season,7 rushes over 40 yards, Lombardi
July 23, 2025Jul 23 You got me digging back to 2021 again. So much that occurred last season just priced out exactly my views and opinions…not just a little…or kind of…things played out exactly like I was telling you. Built a team prioritizing the monster Oline run blockers. Such a dumb team building strategy or philosophy to follow that up by lowest appreciation towards RB. Crucial to take that full advantage of…ughh…that advantage. Saquan took those opportunities created and blasted opponents. Huge gains….so critical instead of just producing 8 yard pickups instead…because of the RB explosive limitations.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Hindsight judgement:Pay the RB and get the best one you canDon’t ever pay a RB…committee group of any players works because it’s all Oline anyway Trying to even imagine any scenario could have taken place that could have made FL and No Mas opinions on this look anymore foolish….or proved out my point on the field so perfectly
July 23, 2025Jul 23 The other factor surrounding RB is the pay scale. It’s cheap. Why wouldn’t you just pay top dollar to a RB? Even after Barkley got top dollar as a FA it was peanuts comparatively. Then threw more money at him after such a fantastic performance….still a bargain.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Signed another DT I see. Makes me wonder if there are injuries we aren’t aware of yet with our DTs.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Thomas Booker I see as ready to step up for us at DT. He got just a few opportunities last season. If our depth wasn’t so strong last season he would have been utilized so much more. He fits under Fangio and Hurtt. Not starter level talent…not big enough to really be a true Nose…but can handle the duties to be in the rotation.
July 23, 2025Jul 23 Gabe Hall came with some higher level potential at DT. He’s the most likely candidate of next DT to step up for us. Don’t know if he actually will or not. Does feel likely we’ll see somebody step up down the depth chart at DT.
Create an account or sign in to comment